Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1182475.1182526acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How HCI-practitioners want to evaluate their own practice

Published: 14 October 2006 Publication History

Abstract

How do individual HCI-practitioners evaluate their own work practice? And how would they like to evaluate it? Answers to these questions will give new knowledge on the state-of-the-practice in this area, and provide insight for researchers trying to improve practitioners' ability to evaluate their development project activities. The questions were investigated through questionnaire survey responses of 179 HCI-practitioners from the Nordic countries. It was found that the general maturity for evaluation of own practice were fairly high. However, the results indicate that HCI-practitioners tend not to evaluate their practice with regard to its impact on the development team and project leader; which may be counter productive to the downstream utility of HCI activities. Presentation of ongoing development of evaluation procedures, based on the results, will be included in the talk at NordiCHI 2006.

References

[1]
Bark, I., Følstad, A., Gulliksen, J. Use and usefulness of HCI methods: Results from an exploratory study among Nordic HCI practitioners. In T. McEwan, J. Gulliksen, and D. Benyon (ed.s), People and Computers XIX: The Bigger Picture, Springer (2005)
[2]
Bias R. G., Mayhew D. J. Cost-Justifying Usability, Academic press, Inc (1994)
[3]
Chattratichart, J., Brodie, J. Applying user testing data to UEM performance metrics. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1119--1122
[4]
Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Persson, J., Hektor, A., Herulf, L. Making a difference - a survey of the usability profession in Sweden. Proc. NordiCHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 207--215
[5]
Hertzum, M., Jacobsen, N. E.: The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 15(1) (2003), 183--204
[6]
ISO/IEC 18529 Human-centred Lifecycle Process Descriptions. ISO/IEC TR 18529 (2000)
[7]
Jokela T KESSU UPA. An Approach for UCD Performance Assessment (UPA) of Development Projects. University of Oulu. (2001)
[8]
Karat, C-M. Cost-justifying usability engineering in the software life cycle. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.). Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier Science (1997)
[9]
Law, E. L.-C., Hvannberg, E. T. Complementarity and convergence of heuristic evaluation and usability test: a case study of universal brokerage platform. Proc. NordiCHI 2002, ACM Press (2002)
[10]
Molich, R., Ede, M. R., Kaasgaard, K., Karyukin, B. Comparative usability evaluation. Behaviour & Information Technology 23(1) (2004), 65--74.
[11]
Nielsen, J. Gilutz, S. Usability Return on Investment, Nielsen Norman Group (2003)
[12]
Nielsen, J., Landauer, T. K., A Mathematical Model of the Finding of Usability Problems. Proc. INTERCHI'93, ACM Press (1993), 206--213.
[13]
Vredenburg K., Mao J., Smith P. W., Carey T., A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice, CHI Letters 4(1) (2002), 471--478.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A layered structure for a design space dedicated to rich interactive multimedia contentMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-3714-676:4(5191-5220)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
  • (2013)Exploring Adaptivity in Service Development: The Case of Mobile PlatformsJournal of Product Innovation Management10.1111/jpim.1211031:3(501-515)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2013
  • (2010)A case study of user-centred design in four swiss RUP projectsAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction10.1155/2010/3293512010(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010

Index Terms

  1. How HCI-practitioners want to evaluate their own practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '06: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
    October 2006
    517 pages
    ISBN:1595933255
    DOI:10.1145/1182475
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 October 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. HCI-practitioner
    2. evaluation procedure
    3. survey

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    NORDICHI06

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2017)A layered structure for a design space dedicated to rich interactive multimedia contentMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-3714-676:4(5191-5220)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
    • (2013)Exploring Adaptivity in Service Development: The Case of Mobile PlatformsJournal of Product Innovation Management10.1111/jpim.1211031:3(501-515)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2013
    • (2010)A case study of user-centred design in four swiss RUP projectsAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction10.1155/2010/3293512010(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media