Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1228716.1228749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Assessing the scalability of a multiple robot interface

Published: 10 March 2007 Publication History

Abstract

As multiple robot systems become more common, it is necessary to develop scalable human-robot interfaces that permit the inclusion of additional robots without reducing the overall system performance. Workload and situational awareness play key roles in determining the ratio of m operators to n robots. A scalable interface, where m is much smaller than n, will have to manage the operator's workload and promote a high level of situation awareness. This work focused on the development of a scalable interface for a single human-multiple robot system. This interface introduces a relational "halo display that augments a camera view to promote situational awareness and the management of multiple robots by providing information regarding the robots' relative locations with respect to a selected robot. An evaluation was conducted to determine the scalability of the interface focusing on the effects of increasing the number of robots on workload, situation awareness, and robot usage. Twenty participants completed two bomb defusing tasks: one employing six robots, the other nine. The results indicated that increasing the number of robots increased overall workload and the operator's situation awareness.

References

[1]
Baker, M., Casey, R., Keyes, B., and Yanco, H. A. "Improved Interfaces for Human-Robot Interaction in Urban search and Rescue." IEEE Intl. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2960--2965, 2004.
[2]
Balakrish, N. & Rao, C.R. "Order Statistics: theory and methods." Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 16, New York: Elsevier, 1998.
[3]
Crandall, J. W., Goodrich, M. A., Olsen, D. R., and Nielsen, C. W. "Validating Human-Robot Interaction Schemes in Multi-Tasking Environments." IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics--Part A, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.438--449, July 2005.
[4]
Daily, M., Cho, Y., Martin, K., and Payton, D. "World Embedded Interfaces for Human-Robot Interaction." Proc. of the 3th Annual Hawaii Intl. Conf. on System Sciences, pp. 125--126, 2003.
[5]
Drury, J., Scholtz, J., and Yanco, H. A. "Awareness in human-robot interactions." Proc. of the 2003 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 912--918, 2003.
[6]
Dubowsky, S., Iagnemma, K., Liberatore, S., Lambeth, D. M., Plante, J. S., and Boston, P. J. "A Concept Mission: Microbots for Large-Scale Planetary Surface and Subsurface Exploration." Proc. of the Space Technology and Applications Intl. Forum, pp. 1449--1458, 2005.
[7]
Endsley, M. R. "Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems." Human Factors, 37, pp. 65--84, 1995.
[8]
Endsley, M.R., Selcon, S.J., Hardiman, T.D., & Croft, D.G. "A comparative evaluation of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness." Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp 82--86, 1998.
[9]
Hart, S., and Staveland L. "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research." In: Hancock P, Meshkati N (Eds.). Human Mental Workload. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 139--183, 1988.
[10]
Kadous, M. W., Sheh, R. K., and Sammut, C. "Effective user interface design for rescue robotics." Proc. of the 1st ACM Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 250--257, 2006.
[11]
NASA TLX for Windows, NCARAI ~ Interface Design and Evaluation. http://www.nrl.navy.mil/aic/ide/NASATLX.php.
[12]
Nielsen, C. W. and Goodrich, M. A. "Comparing the usefulness of video and map information in navigation tasks." Proc. of the 1st ACM Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 95--101, 2006.
[13]
Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., Squire, P., Furukawa, H. and Miller, C. "A Flexible Delegation-Type Interface Enhances System Performance in Human Supervision of Multiple Robots: Empirical Studies with RoboFlag." IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A, 35(4), pp. 481--493, 2005.
[14]
Salmon, P., Stanton, N., Walker, G., and Green, D. "Situation awareness measurement: A review of applicability for C4i environments." Applied Ergonomics, 37:225--238. 2006.
[15]
Scholtz, J., Antonishek, B., and Young, J. "Implementation of a situation awareness assessment tool for evaluation of human-robot interfaces. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A, 35(4): pp. 450--459, 2005.
[16]
Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., and Goodrich, M. "Common metrics for human-robot interaction." Proc. of the 1st ACM Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 33--40, 2006.
[17]
Taylor, R.M. "Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. Proc. of the AGARD AMP Symp. on Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations, CP478, 1989.
[18]
Wang, J., Lewis, M., Hughes, S., Koes, M., and Carpin, S. "Validating USARsim for use in HRI Research." Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 457--461, 2005.
[19]
Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J. Engineerin Psychology and Human Performance, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1999.
[20]
Yanco, H.A., Baker, M., Casey, R., Keyes, B., Thoren, P., Drury, J., Few, D., Nielsen, C., and Bruemmer, D. Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction for Urban Search and Rescue. Proc. of the 2006 IEEE Intl Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics. Gaithersburg, MD, 2006.
[21]
Yanco, H.A., and Drury, J. "Where am I? Acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform". Proc. of the 2004 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2835--2840, 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gaze-based Augmented Reality Interfaces to Support Scalable Human-Robot Teaming2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN)10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731399(1899-1906)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Divided Attention in Human-Robot Teaming: Assessing Performance in Large-Scale Interactive Virtual EnvironmentsSpatial Cognition XIII10.1007/978-3-031-63115-3_8(114-127)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction ResearchInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00968-415:11(1841-1870)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '07: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
March 2007
392 pages
ISBN:9781595936172
DOI:10.1145/1228716
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 March 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human robotic interaction
  2. multiple robots
  3. situational awareness
  4. workload

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

HRI07
HRI07: International Conference on Human Robot Interaction
March 10 - 12, 2007
Virginia, Arlington, USA

Acceptance Rates

HRI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 101 submissions, 22%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gaze-based Augmented Reality Interfaces to Support Scalable Human-Robot Teaming2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN)10.1109/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731399(1899-1906)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Divided Attention in Human-Robot Teaming: Assessing Performance in Large-Scale Interactive Virtual EnvironmentsSpatial Cognition XIII10.1007/978-3-031-63115-3_8(114-127)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction ResearchInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00968-415:11(1841-1870)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Intuitive, Efficient and Ergonomic Tele-Nursing Robot Interfaces: Design Evaluation and EvolutionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/352610811:3(1-41)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Examining Audio Communication Mechanisms for Supervising Fleets of Agricultural Robots2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900859(293-300)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
  • (2022)AugRE: Augmented Robot Environment to Facilitate Human-Robot Teaming and Communication *2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900721(800-805)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Robot Vitals and Robot Health: Towards Systematically Quantifying Runtime Performance Degradation in Robots Under Adverse ConditionsIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10.1109/LRA.2022.31926127:4(10729-10736)Online publication date: Oct-2022
  • (2021)A Web-Based User Interface for HRI Studies on Multi-Robot Furniture ArrangementCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3434074.3447272(680-681)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Towards User-Centric Robot Furniture Arrangement2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515552(1066-1073)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2021
  • (2021)Planning and Monitoring Multi-Job Type Swarm Search and Service MissionsJournal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems10.1007/s10846-020-01272-3101:3Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media