Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240693acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A minimal model for predicting visual search in human-computer interaction

Published: 29 April 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Visual search is an important part of human-computer interaction. It is critical that we build theory about how people visually search displays in order to better support the users' visual capabilities and limitations in everyday tasks. One way of building such theory is through computational cognitive modeling. The ultimate promise for cognitive modeling in HCI it to provide the science base needed for predictive interface analysis tools. This paper discusses computational cognitive modeling of the perceptual, strategic, and oculomotor processes people used in a visual search task. This work refines and rounds out previously reported cognitive modeling and eye tracking analysis. A revised "minimal model" of visual search is presented that explains a variety of eye movement data better than the original model. The revised model uses a parsimonious strategy that is not tied to a particular visual structure or feature beyond the location of objects. Three characteristics of the minimal strategy are discussed in detail.

References

[1]
Brumby, D. P., & Howes, A. (in press). Strategies for Guiding Interactive Search: An Empirical Investigation into the Consequences of Label Relevance for Assessment and Selection. Human-Computer Interaction.
[2]
Halverson, T., & Hornof, A. J. (2004). Explaining Eye Movements in the Visual Search of Varying Density Layouts. In Proc. ICCM 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 124--129.
[3]
Hooge, I. T. C., & Erkelens, C. J. (1996). Control of fixation duration in a simple search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 969--976.
[4]
Hornof, A. J. (2004). Cognitive Strategies for the Visual Search of Hierarchical Computer Displays. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(3), 183--223.
[5]
Hornof, A. J., & Halverson, T. (2003). Cognitive strategies and eye movements for searching hierarchical computer displays. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press, 249--256.
[6]
John, B. E., Prevas, K., Salvucci, D. D., & Koedinger, K. (2004). Predictive Human Performance Modeling Made Easy. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM, 455--462.
[7]
Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 391--438.
[8]
Koostra, G., Nederveen, A., & de Boer, B. (2006). On the Bottom-Up and Top-Down Influences of Eye Movements. In Proc. Proc. CogSci 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2538.
[9]
Motter, B. C., & Belky, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38(12), 1905--1815.
[10]
Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Wang, R. F., Irwin, D. E., & McCarley, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12(4), 287--292.
[11]
St. Amant, R., & Ritter, F. E. (2004). Automated GOMS-to-ACT-R Model Generation. In Proc. ICCM 2004, Lawrence Earlbaum, 26--31.
[12]
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2), 202--238.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Gazeformer: Scalable, Effective and Fast Prediction of Goal-Directed Human Attention2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00145(1441-1450)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2022)Weakly Supervised Visual Saliency PredictionIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2022.315806431(3111-3124)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Modeling Angle-Based Pointing Tasks in Augmented Reality InterfacesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30319578(192597-192607)Online publication date: 2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2007
1654 pages
ISBN:9781595935939
DOI:10.1145/1240624
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. EPIC
  2. cognitive modeling
  3. cognitive strategies
  4. eye movements
  5. screen design
  6. visual search

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CHI07
Sponsor:
CHI07: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 28 - May 3, 2007
California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 182 of 840 submissions, 22%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Gazeformer: Scalable, Effective and Fast Prediction of Goal-Directed Human Attention2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00145(1441-1450)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2022)Weakly Supervised Visual Saliency PredictionIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2022.315806431(3111-3124)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Modeling Angle-Based Pointing Tasks in Augmented Reality InterfacesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30319578(192597-192607)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2018)Variability in Reactions to Instructional Guidance during Smartphone-Based Assisted Navigation of Blind UsersProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/32649412:3(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2018
  • (2018)Personality and individual differencesCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-018-0470-620:3(337-349)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018
  • (2017)Investigating users’ eye movement behavior in critiquing-based recommender systemsAI Communications10.3233/AIC-17073730:3-4(207-222)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
  • (2015)The Emergence of Interactive BehaviorProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702123.2702483(4217-4226)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
  • (2013)Comparing native signers' perception of American Sign Language animations and videos via eye trackingProceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/2513383.2513441(1-8)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2013
  • (2013)Predicting whether users view dynamic content on the world wide webACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/2463579.246358020:2(1-33)Online publication date: 27-May-2013
  • (2013)Action graphs and user performance analysisInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.10.01471:3(276-302)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media