Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1250790.1250812acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness

Published: 11 June 2007 Publication History

Abstract

The design of algorithms on complex networks, such as routing, ranking or recommendation algorithms, requires a detailed understanding of the growth characteristics of the networks of interest, such as the Internet,the web graph, social networks or online communities. To this end, preferential attachment, in which the popularity (or relevance) of a node is determined by its degree, is a well-known and appealing random graph model, whose predictions are in accordance with experiments on the web graph and several social networks. However, its central assumption, that the popularity of the nodes dependsonly on their degree, is not a realistic one, since every node has potentially some intrinsic quality which can differentiate its attractiveness from other nodes with similar degrees.
In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis of preferential attachment with fitness, suggested by Bianconi and Barabási and studied by Motwani and Xu, in which the degree of a vertex is scaled by its quality to determine its attractiveness. Including quality considerations in the classical preferential attachment model provides a much more realistic description of many complex networks, such as the web graph, and allows toobserve a much richer behavior in the growth dynamics of these networks. Specifically, depending on the shape of the distributionfrom which the qualities of the vertices are drawn, we observe three distinct phases, namely a first-mover-advantage phase, afit-get-richer phase and an innovation-pays-offphase. We precisely characterize the properties of the quality distribution that result in each of these phases and we computethe exact growth dynamics for each phase. The dynamics provide rich information about the quality of the vertices, which can bevery useful in many practical contexts, including ranking algorithms for the web, recommendation algorithms, as well as thestudy of social networks.

References

[1]
K.B. Athreya and P.E. Ney. Branching processes. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 196.
[2]
Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286:509--512, 1999.
[3]
Noam Berger, Christian Borgs, Jennifer T. Chayes, and Amin Saberi. On the spread of viruses on the internet. In SODA, pages 301--310, 2005.
[4]
Ginestra Bianconi and Albert-László Barabási. Bose-einstein condensation in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(24):5632--5635, Jun 2001.
[5]
Béla Bollobás, Christian Borgs, Jennifer T. Chayes, and Oliver Riordan. Directed scale-free graphs. In SODA, pages 132--139, 2003.
[6]
Béla Bollobás and Oliver Riordan. The diameter of a scale-free random graph. Combinatorica, 24(1):5--34, 2004.
[7]
Béla Bollobás, Oliver Riordan, Joel Spencer, and Gábor E. Tusnády. The degree sequence of a scale-free random graph process. Random Struct. Algorithms, 18(3):279--290, 2001.
[8]
Andrei Broder, Ravi Kumar, Farzin Maghoul, Prabhakar Raghavan, Sridhar Rajagopalan, Raymie Stata, Andrew Tomkins, and Janet Wiener. Graph structure in the web. Journal of Computer Networks (Amsterdam), 33(1--6):309--320, Jun 2000.
[9]
Colin Cooper and Alan Frieze. A general model of web graphs, 2001.
[10]
Derek J. de~Solla~Price. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683):510--515, July 30 1965.
[11]
Eleni Drinea, Mihaela Enachescu, and Michael Mitzenmacher. Variations on random graph models for the Web. Technical Report TR--06--01, Harvard University, 2001.
[12]
Michalis Faloutsos, Petros Faloutsos, and Christos Faloutsos. On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In SIGCOMM, pages 251--262, 1999.
[13]
Abraham Flaxman, Alan M. Frieze, and Trevor I. Fenner. High degree vertices and eigenvalues in the preferential attachment graph. In RANDOM-APPROX, pages 264--274, 2003.
[14]
Nigel Gilbert. A simulation of the structure of academic science. Sociological Research Online, 2(2), 1997.
[15]
Svante Janson. Functional limit theorems for multitype branching processes and generalized Pólya urns. Stochastic Process. Appl., 110(2):177--245, 2004.
[16]
Jon Kleinberg. The emerging intersection of social and technological networks: Open questions and algorithmic challenges. In FOCS, 2006.
[17]
Jon M. Kleinberg, Ravi Kumar, Prabhakar Raghavan, Sridhar Rajagopalan, and Andrew Tomkins. The web as a graph: Measurements, models, and methods. In COCOON, pages 1--17, 1999.
[18]
P.L. Krapivsky and S. Redner. Organization of grwoing random networks. Physical Review E, 63(6):066123--1--066123--14, June 2001.
[19]
Ravi Kumar, Prabhakar Raghavan, Sridhar Rajagopalan, DSivakumar, Andrew Tomkins, and Eli Upfal. Random graph models for the web graph. In FOCS, pages 57--65, 2000.
[20]
A.J. Lotka. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16(12):317--323, June 19 1926.
[21]
Michael Mitzenmacher. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math., 1(2):226--251, 2004.
[22]
Rajeev Motwani and Ying Xu. Evolution of page popularity under random web graph models. In PODS, pages 134--142, 2006.
[23]
Christos H. Papadimitriou. Algorithms, games, and the internet. In STOC, pages 749--753, 2001.
[24]
Prabhakar Raghavan. The changing face of web search: algorithms, auctions and advertising. In STOC, page 129, 2006.
[25]
Herbert A. Simon. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(4):425--440, December 1955.
[26]
G. Yule. A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of dr. j.c. willis. F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 213(B):21--87, 1925.
[27]
George K. Zipf. Human Behavior and The Principles of Least Effort. Addison Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1949.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Complex quantum networks: a topical reviewJournal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical10.1088/1751-8121/ad41a657:23(233001)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
  • (2024)Learning the mechanisms of network growthScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-61940-414:1Online publication date: 24-May-2024
  • (2024)Local weak limit of preferential attachment random trees with additive fitnessAdvances in Applied Probability10.1017/apr.2023.54(1-40)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC '07: Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
    June 2007
    734 pages
    ISBN:9781595936318
    DOI:10.1145/1250790
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 June 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Bose-Einstein condensation
    2. Pólya urns
    3. preferential attachment
    4. random graphs

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    STOC07
    Sponsor:
    STOC07: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 11 - 13, 2007
    California, San Diego, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Complex quantum networks: a topical reviewJournal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical10.1088/1751-8121/ad41a657:23(233001)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
    • (2024)Learning the mechanisms of network growthScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-61940-414:1Online publication date: 24-May-2024
    • (2024)Local weak limit of preferential attachment random trees with additive fitnessAdvances in Applied Probability10.1017/apr.2023.54(1-40)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Preferential Attachment Hypergraph with Vertex Deactivation2023 31st International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS)10.1109/MASCOTS59514.2023.10387624(1-8)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Degree distributions in recursive trees with fitnessesAdvances in Applied Probability10.1017/apr.2022.40(1-37)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Highway Preferential Attachment Models for Geographic RoutingCombinatorial Optimization and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-49614-1_4(56-80)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
    • (2022)Condensation phenomena in preferential attachment trees with neighbourhood influenceElectronic Journal of Probability10.1214/22-EJP78727:noneOnline publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Dynamical models for random simplicial complexesThe Annals of Applied Probability10.1214/21-AAP175232:4Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Dynamical fitness models: evidence of universality classes for preferential attachment graphsJournal of Applied Probability10.1017/jpr.2021.8159:3(609-630)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Preferential Attachment with Location-Based Choice: Degree Distribution in the Noncondensation PhaseJournal of Statistical Physics10.1007/s10955-021-02782-6184:1Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media