Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability

Published: 01 September 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Various accessibility activities are improving blind access to the increasingly indispensable WWW. These approaches use various metrics to measure the Web's accessibility. “Ease of navigation” (navigability) is one of the crucial factors for blind usability, especially for complicated webpages used in portals and online shopping sites. However, it is difficult for automatic checking tools to evaluate the navigation capabilities even for a single webpage. Navigability issues for complete Web applications are still far beyond their capabilities.
This study aims at obtaining quantitative results about the current accessibility status of real world Web applications, and analyzes real users' behavior on such websites. In Study 1, an automatic analysis method for webpage navigability is introduced, and then a broad survey using this method for 30 international online shopping sites is described. The next study (Study 2) focuses on a fine-grained analysis of real users' behavior on some of these online shopping sites. We modified a voice browser to record each user's actions and the information presented to that user. We conducted user testing on existing sites with this tool. We also developed an analysis and visualization method for the recorded information. The results showed us that users strongly depend on scanning navigation instead of logical navigation. A landmark-oriented navigation model was proposed based on the results. Finally, we discuss future possibilities for improving navigability, including proposals for voice browsers.

References

[1]
Arons, B. 1997. SpeechSkimmer: A system for interactively skimming recorded speech. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 4, 1, 3--38.
[2]
Asakawa, C. and Ito, T. 1998. User interface of a home page reader. In Proceedings of Assets '98: The 3rd International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Marina del Rey, CA, Apr.). ACM, New York, 149--156.
[3]
Asakawa, C. and Takagi, H. 2000. Annotation-based transcoding for nonvisual Web access. In Proceedings of Assets '00: The 4th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Arlington, VA, Nov.). ACM, New York, 172--179.
[4]
Asakawa, C., Takagi, H., Ino, S., and Ifukube, T. 2004. TAJODA: Proposed tactile and jog dial interface for the blind. Trans. IEICE, E87-D, 6.
[5]
Barnicle, K. 2000. Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment. In Proceedings of CUU '00: The Conference on Universal Usability (Arlington, VA, Nov.). ACM, New York, 102--109.
[6]
Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., and Lewis, C. 2002. Cognitive walkthrough for the Web. In Proceedings of CHI '02: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MN, Apr.). ACM, New York, 463--470.
[7]
Blackmon, M. H., Kitajima, M., and Polson, P. G. 2005. Tool for accurately predicting website navigation problems, non-problems, problem severity, and effectiveness of repairs. In Proceedings of CHI '05: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, Apr.). ACM, New York, 31--40.
[8]
Cabinet Office Japan. 2004. Annual report on government measures for persons with disabilities 2004. (See http://www8.cao.go.jp/shougai/whitepaper/h16hakusho/zenbun/(in Japanese)).
[9]
Card, S. K., Pirolli, P., Wege, M. V. D., Morrison, J. B., Reeder, R. W., Schraedley, P. K., and Boshart, J. 2001. Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. In Proceedings of CHI '01: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, WA, Mar.). ACM, New York, 498-- 505.
[10]
Challis, B. P. and Edwards, A. D. N. 2000. Weasel: A computer based system for providing non-visual access to music notation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped. ACM, New York, 1--12.
[11]
Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. 1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.).
[12]
Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. 2000. HTML Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/.)
[13]
Clark, J. and Derose, S. 1999. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation (See http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/.)
[14]
Fukuda, K., Takagi, H., Maeda, J., and Asakawa, C. 2003. An assist method for realizing a Web page structure for blind people. In Proceedings of UAHCI '03: The 2nd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (June). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 960--964.
[15]
Goble, C., Harper, S., and Stevens, R. 2000. The travails of visually impaired web travellers. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM, New York, 1--10.
[16]
Hanson, V. L., Brezin, J. P., Crayne, S., Keates, S., Kjeldsen, R., Richards, J. T., Swart, C., and Trewin, S. 2005. Improving Web accessibility through an enhanced open-source browser. IBM J. Res. Devel. 44, 3, 573--588.
[17]
Jacobs, I. and Brewer, J. 1999. Accessibility Features of CSS. W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS-access.)
[18]
Nchs. 1996. National health interview survey on disability 1994--1995, NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics). (See http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis_dis/nhis_dis.htm.)
[19]
Pirolli, P. 2006. The use of proximal information scent to forage for distal content on the World Wide Web. In Working with Technology in Mind: Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction, A. Kirlik, Ed. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Plessers, P., Casteleyn, S., Yesilada, Y., Troyer, O. D., Stevens, R., Harper, S., and Goble, C. 2005. Accessibility: A web engineering approach. In Proceedings of WWW '05: The 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (Chiba, Japan, May). ACM, New York, 353--362.
[21]
Pontelli, E., Gillan, D., Xiong, W., Saad, E., Gupta, G., and Karshmer, A. I. 2002. Navigation of HTML tables, frames, and XML fragments. In Proceedings of Assets '02: The 5th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Edinburgh, Scotland, July). ACM, New York, 25--32.
[22]
Salampasis, M., Kouroupetroglou, C., and Manitsaris, A. 2005. Semantically enhanced browsing for blind people in the WWW. In Proceedings of HYPERTEXT '05: The 16th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Salzburg, Austria, Sept.). ACM, New York, 32--34.
[23]
Seeman, L. 2006. Role taxonomy for accessible adaptable applications, See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/GUI/.
[24]
Schwerdtfeger, R. 2001. Dynamic Accessible Web Content Roadmap, See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/.
[25]
Stevens, R. 1996. Principles for the design of auditory interfaces to present complex, information to blind people. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York, York, UK.
[26]
Takagi, H. and Asakawa, C. 2000. Transcoding proxy for nonvisual Web access. In Proceedings of Assets '00: The 4th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Arlington, VA, Nov.). ACM, New York, 164--171.
[27]
Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. 2002. Site-wide annotation: Reconstructing existing pages to be accessible. In Proceedings of Assets '02: The 5th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Edinburgh, Scotland, July). ACM, New York, 81--88.
[28]
Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. 2004. Accessibility designer: Visualizing usability for the blind. In Proceedings of Assets '04: The 6th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Atlanta, GA, Oct.). ACM, New York, 177-- 184.
[29]
Theofanos, M. F. and Redish, J. G. 2003. Bridging the gap: Between accessibility and usability. ACM Interact 10, 6, 36--51.
[30]
Watanabe, T. 2002. Windows PCs and internet usage survey for people with visual impairments in Japan. The National Institute of Special Education Research Note (See http://www.nise.go.jp/research/kogaku/twatanab/PCUserSurvey/Survey2002/Survey2002Jp. html (in Japanese)).
[31]
Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., and Goble, C. 2003. A foundation for tool based mobility support for visually impaired web users. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web (Budapest, Hungary, May). ACM, New York, 422--430.
[32]
Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., Harper, S., and Goble, C. 2007. Evaluating DANTE: Semantic Transcoding for Visually Disabled Users. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. (TOCHI) 14, 3 (Sept.), Article 14.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 14, Issue 3
September 2007
124 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/1279700
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2007
Published in TOCHI Volume 14, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Accessibility
  2. Web accessibility
  3. online shopping
  4. usability testing
  5. voice browsers

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)89
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Making Digital Payments Accessible Beyond Sight: A Usability Study of UPI-Based Smartphone ApplicationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334884012(6830-6841)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Clarifying and differentiating discoverabilityHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2024.2364606(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Developing a blind user mental model (BlUMM) for web browsingUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-01035-523:3(1343-1367)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)NARRATIVE REVIEW OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND SENSORY SUBSTITUTION IN PEOPLE WITH VISUAL AND HEARING IMPAIRMENTPSYCHOLOGIA10.2117/psysoc.2022-B03165:1(70-99)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Speaking with My Screen Reader: Using Audio Fictions to Explore Conversational Access to InterfacesProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3608404(1-18)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Enabling People with Blindness to Distinguish Lines of Mathematical Charts with Audio-Tactile Graphic ReadersProceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3594806.3594818(384-391)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Accessible Document Layout: An Interface for 2D Tactile DisplaysProceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3594806.3594811(265-271)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
  • (2023)The Accessibility of Data Visualizations on the Web for Screen Reader Users: Practices and Experiences During COVID-19ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/355789916:1(1-29)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Exploring the Accessibility of Crypto TechnologiesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585746(1-10)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Developing Dynamic Audio Navigation UIs to Pinpoint Elements in Tactile GraphicsMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti61201136:12(113)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media