Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1341531.1341561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining

Published: 11 February 2008 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    One of the important types of information on the Web is the opinions expressed in the user generated content, e.g., customer reviews of products, forum posts, and blogs. In this paper, we focus on customer reviews of products. In particular, we study the problem of determining the semantic orientations (positive, negative or neutral) of opinions expressed on product features in reviews. This problem has many applications, e.g., opinion mining, summarization and search. Most existing techniques utilize a list of opinion (bearing) words (also called opinion lexicon) for the purpose. Opinion words are words that express desirable (e.g., great, amazing, etc.) or undesirable (e.g., bad, poor, etc) states. These approaches, however, all have some major shortcomings. In this paper, we propose a holistic lexicon-based approach to solving the problem by exploiting external evidences and linguistic conventions of natural language expressions. This approach allows the system to handle opinion words that are context dependent, which cause major difficulties for existing algorithms. It also deals with many special words, phrases and language constructs which have impacts on opinions based on their linguistic patterns. It also has an effective function for aggregating multiple conflicting opinion words in a sentence. A system, called Opinion Observer, based on the proposed technique has been implemented. Experimental results using a benchmark product review data set and some additional reviews show that the proposed technique is highly effective. It outperforms existing methods significantly

    References

    [1]
    A. Andreevskaia and S. Bergler. Mining WordNet for Fuzzy Sentiment: Sentiment Tag Extraction from WordNet Glosses. In EACL'06, pp. 209--216, 2006.
    [2]
    P. Beineke, T. Hastie, C. Manning, and S. Vaithyanathan. An Exploration of Sentiment Summarization. In Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications, 2003.
    [3]
    G. Carenini, R. Ng, and A. Pauls. Interactive Multimedia Summaries of Evaluative Text. IUI'06, 2006.
    [4]
    S. Das, and M. Chen. Yahoo! for Amazon: Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. APFA'01, 2001.
    [5]
    K. Dave, S. Lawrence, and D. Pennock. Mining the Peanut Gallery: Opinion Extraction and Semantic Classification of Product Reviews. WWW'03, 2003.
    [6]
    X. Ding and B. Liu. The Utility of Linguistic Rules in Opinion Mining." SIGIR-2007 (poster paper).
    [7]
    A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani, EACL-06, 2006. Determining Term Subjectivity and Term Orientation for Opinion Mining, EACL-06, 2006.
    [8]
    C. Fellbaum. WordNet: an Electronic Lexical Database, MIT Press, 1998.
    [9]
    M. Gamon, A. Aue, S. Corston-Oliver, and E. K. Ringger. Pulse: Mining customer opinions from free text. IDA'2005.
    [10]
    V. Hatzivassiloglou and J. Wiebe. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. COLING'00, 2000.
    [11]
    V. Hatzivassiloglou and K. McKeown. Predicting the Semantic Orientation of Adjectives. ACL-EACL'97, 1997.
    [12]
    M. Hearst. Direction-based Text Interpretation as an Information Access Refinement. In P. Jacobs, editor, Text-Based Intelligent Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
    [13]
    M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. KDD'04, 2004.
    [14]
    N. Jindal, and B. Liu. Mining Comparative Sentences and Relations. In AAAI'06, 2006.
    [15]
    N. Kaji and M. Kitsuregawa. Automatic Construction of Polarity-Tagged Corpus from HTML Documents. COLING/ACL'06, 2006.
    [16]
    H. Kanayama and T. Nasukawa. Fully Automatic Lexicon Expansion for Domain-Oriented Sentiment Analysis. EMNLP'06, 2006.
    [17]
    S. Kim and E. Hovy. Determining the Sentiment of Opinions. COLING'04, 2004.
    [18]
    S. Kim and E. Hovy. Automatic Identification of Pro and Con Reasons in Online Reviews. COLING/ACL 2006.
    [19]
    N. Kobayashi, R. Iida, K. Inui and Y. Matsumoto. Opinion Mining on the Web by Extracting Subject-Attribute-Value Relations. In Proc. of AAAI-CAAW'06, 2006.
    [20]
    L.-W. Ku, Y.-T. Liang and H.-H. Chen. Opinion Extraction, Summarization and Tracking in News and Blog Corpora. In Proc. of the AAAI-CAAW'06, 2006.
    [21]
    B. Liu, M. Hu, M. and J. Cheng. Opinion Observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web. WWW-05, 2005.
    [22]
    S. Morinaga, K. Yamanishi, K. Tateishi, and T. Fukushima, Mining Product Reputations on the Web. KDD'02, 2002.
    [23]
    T. Nasukawa and J. Yi. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. K-CA-2003.
    [24]
    V. Ng, S. Dasgupta and S. M. Niaz Arifin. Examining the Role of Linguistic Knowledge Sources in the Automatic Identification and Classification of Reviews. ACL'06, 2006.
    [25]
    NLProcessor ¿ Text Analysis Toolkit. 2000. http://www.infogistics.com/textanalysis.html.
    [26]
    B. Pang and L. Lee, Seeing Stars: Exploiting Class Relationships for Sentiment Categorization with Respect to Rating Scales. ACL'05, 2005.
    [27]
    B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques. EMNLP'2002, 2002.
    [28]
    A-M. Popescu and O. Etzioni. Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews. EMNLP-05, 2005.
    [29]
    E. Riloff and J. Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. EMNLP'2003, 2003.
    [30]
    V. Stoyanov and C. Cardie. Toward opinion summarization: Linking the sources. In Proc. of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, 2006.
    [31]
    R. Tong. An Operational System for Detecting and Tracking Opinions in on-line discussion. SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Operational Text Classification, 2001.
    [32]
    P. Turney. Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews. ACL'02, 2002.
    [33]
    T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and R. Hwa. Just how mad are you? Finding strong and weak opinion clauses. AAAI'04, 2004.
    [34]
    J. Wiebe, and R. Mihalcea. Word Sense and Subjectivity. In ACL'06, 2006.
    [35]
    J. Wiebe, and E. Riloff: Creating Subjective and Objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. CICLing, 2005.
    [36]
    H. Yu, V. Hatzivassiloglou. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. EMNLP'2003.
    [37]
    L. Zhuang, F. Jing, X.-Yan Zhu, and L. Zhang. Movie Review Mining and Summarization. CIKM-06, 2006.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Affective Computing: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future TrendsIntelligent Computing10.34133/icomputing.00763Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Chinese text dual attention network for aspect-level sentiment classificationPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.029533119:3(e0295331)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)An aspect sentiment analysis model with Aspect Gated Convolution and Dual-Feature Filtering layersJournal of Big Data10.1186/s40537-024-00969-811:1Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 2008
    270 pages
    ISBN:9781595939272
    DOI:10.1145/1341531
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 February 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. context dependent opinions
    2. opinion mining
    3. sentiment analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)141
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Affective Computing: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future TrendsIntelligent Computing10.34133/icomputing.00763Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Chinese text dual attention network for aspect-level sentiment classificationPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.029533119:3(e0295331)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)An aspect sentiment analysis model with Aspect Gated Convolution and Dual-Feature Filtering layersJournal of Big Data10.1186/s40537-024-00969-811:1Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Supervised Contrast Learning Text Classification Model Based on Data Quality AugmentationACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing10.1145/365330023:5(1-12)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
    • (2024)Confidence-Aware Sentiment Quantification via Sentiment Perturbation ModelingIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2023.330195615:2(736-750)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2024)Sentiment Analysis on Customer Feedback for Improved Decision Making: A Literature Review2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS)10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459452(207-212)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2024
    • (2024)A Comprehensive Survey on Affective Computing: Challenges, Trends, Applications, and Future DirectionsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342248012(96150-96168)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)SPACE: Senti-Prompt As Classifying Embedding for sentiment analysisPattern Recognition Letters10.1016/j.patrec.2024.02.022Online publication date: Feb-2024
    • (2024)CAT: Continual Adapter Tuning for aspect sentiment classificationNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127423(127423)Online publication date: Feb-2024
    • (2024)Efficient utilization of pre-trained models: A review of sentiment analysis via prompt learningKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111148283(111148)Online publication date: Jan-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media