A multi-perspective digital library to facilitate integrating teaching research methods across the computing curriculum
Authors: 
Anne G. Applin, Hilary J. Holz, William Joel, Ifeyinwa Okoye, Katherine Deibel, Becky Grasser, Briony J. Oates, Gwendolyne WoodAuthors Info & Claims
Anne G. Applin, Hilary J. Holz, William Joel, Ifeyinwa Okoye, Katherine Deibel, Becky Grasser, Briony J. Oates, Gwendolyne WoodAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 184 - 203
Abstract
The <u>c</u>omputing <u>r</u>esearch <u>m</u>ethods (CRM) literature is scattered across discourse communities and published in specialty journals and conference proceedings. This dispersion has led to the use of inconsistent terminology when referring to CRM. With no established CRM vocabulary and isolated discourse communities, computing as a field needs to engage in a sense-making process to establish the common ground necessary to support meaningful dialog.
We propose to establish common ground through the construction of the <u>c</u>omputing <u>r</u>esearch <u>m</u>ethods <u>m</u>ulti-<u>p</u>erspective <u>d</u>igital <u>l</u>ibrary (CRM-MPDL), a scholar-produced digital resource for the CRM community. As with its parent design research project on teaching CRM, CRM-MPDL is being developed through iterative and participatory design in an emergent fashion in tandem with the larger CRM community.
For our resource to be viable, we must carefully explore the rich details and nuances of our stakeholder communities and the perspectives they bring to the sense-making process. As a discount alternative to truly having a representative sample of our user population "in the room" with us throughout the design and implementation process, we have implemented a development approach for CRM-MPDL using personas as a means to gain insights and feedback from the target user communities.
For this iteration of the development process, we are concentrating on the needs of the faculty.
In this report, we present our evolving understanding of the project, and seek feedback and input on several key aspects of the theoretical and process models. We then present the framework for the faculty personas, as well as an overview of some of the personas at the time the paper was prepared, in the hopes that we can entice readers to visit the project website to help with the ongoing audit and refinement process. We also give an overview of the content model for CRM-MPDL, which will have evolved (and may even be available as a working prototype) by the time this article appears in print. Finally, we conclude with a current status summary, and issue several specific calls for participation in the ongoing work of the project.
References
[1]
ACM guide to computing literature. http://portal.acm.org/portal.cfm, 2007.
[2]
B. B. Alexander, J. Foertsch, and S. Daffinrud. The spend a summer with a scientist program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements for success. Technical report, LEAD Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, July 1998.
[3]
V. L. Almstrum, O. Hazzan, M. Guzdial, and M. Petre. Challenges to computer science education research. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 191--192, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
[4]
V. L. Almstrum and C.-C. Wu. The CSedRes toolbox: A resource to support research in computer science education. SIGCSE Bull., 25(4):21--26, 1993.
[5]
G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng. Computers and democracy. Aldershot, Avebury, 1987.
[6]
Blogher community guidelines. http://blogher.org/what-are-your-community-guidelines.
[7]
G. Booch. Readn', writ'n, 'rithmetic.and code'n. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1):197--197, 2007.
[8]
J. Brainard. The tough road to better science teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(48):A16, 2007.
[9]
S. Brint, M. Riddle, L. Turk-Bicakci, and C. S. Levy. From the liberal to the practical arts in american colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. Journal of Higher Education, 76(2):151--180, Mar/Apr 2005.
[10]
The carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/, 2006.
[11]
L. N. Cassel, R. H. Sloan, G. Davies, H. Topi, and A. McGettrick. The computing ontology project: the computing education application. In SIGCSE '07: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 519--520, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
[12]
CiteSeer. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/, 1997.
[13]
A. Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How To Restore The Sanity. Sams, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1999.
[14]
A. Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum, chapter Designing for Pleasure. Number 9. Sams - Pearson Education, 2004.
[15]
P. J. Denning. Great principles in computing curricula. In SIGCSE '04: Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 336--341, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.
[16]
B. Dervin. From the mind's eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In B. Dervin, L. Foreman-Wernet, and E. Lauterbach, editors, Sense-Making Methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin, pages 270--292. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 2003.
[17]
K. Don. Greenstone3: A modular digital library. http://www.greenstone.org/docs/greenstone3/manual.pdf.
[18]
Engineering Information. Compendex. http://www.ei.org/databases/compendex.html.
[19]
S. Fincher and M. Petre. Computer Science Education Research. RoutledgeFalmer, 2004.
[20]
J. Fry and S. Talja. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. J. Inf. Sci., 33(2):115--133, 2007.
[21]
R. L. Glass, V. Ramesh, and I. Vessey. An analysis of research in computing disciplines. Communications of the ACM, 47(6):89--94, June 2004.
[22]
J. Grudin. Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka, editors, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, chapter 6, pages 99--119. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA, 1993.
[23]
J. Grudin and J. Pruitt. Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2002, pages 144--161, 2002.
[24]
Strategic programs for innovations in undergraduate physics: Project report. Technical report, National Task Force on Undergraduate Physics, January 2003.
[25]
H. J. Holz, A. Applin, B. Haberman, D. Joyce, H. Purchase, and C. Reed. Research methods in computing: what are they, and how should we teach them? In ITiCSE-WGR '06: Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 96--114, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
[26]
A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour. Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91:36--74, 2007.
[27]
C. C. Kuhlthau. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42:361--371, 1991.
[28]
J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press., 1991.
[29]
C. Liu and R. Houdek. Teaching computer science graduate students scholarly literature review techniques. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual, pages 14--19, 2006.
[30]
A. C. McCormick and C.-M. Zhao. Rethinking and reframing the carnegie classification. Change, pages 51--57, September/October 2005.
[31]
B. McMurtrie. Europe's education chief seeks trans-atlantic cooperation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(25):A39, February 2006.
[32]
B. J. Oates. Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage Publications Ltd., 2006.
[33]
A. Pears, S. Seidman, C. Eney, P. Kinnunen, and L. Malmi. Constructing a core literature for computing education research. SIGCSE Bull., 37(4):152--161, 2005.
[34]
J. Pruitt and J. Grudin. Personas: Practice and theory. In Proceedings of DUX 2003, 2003.
[35]
S. H. Russell. Evaluation of nsf support for undergraduate research opportunities: Draft synthesis report executive summary. Technical report, SRI International, July 2006.
[36]
D. Schuler and A. Namioka. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.
[37]
SIGCSE-CSRM. SIGCSE Committee on Teaching Computer Science Research Methods. http://acc.csueastbay.edu/~csrm/.
[38]
D. I. K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, and M. Jørgensen. The future of empirical methods in software engineering research. In FOSE '07: 2007 Future of Software Engineering, pages 358--378, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.
[39]
T. Sumner and M. Marlino. Digital libraries and educational practice: a case for new models. In JCDL '04: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 170--178, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.
[40]
D. P. Truex, R. Baskerville, and H. Klein. Growing systems in emergent organizations. Commun. ACM, 42(8):117--123, 1999.
[41]
R. L. Van Horn. Empirical studies of management information systems. Data Base, 5(2-3-4):172--182, 1973.
[42]
R. Whitley. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2nd edition, 2000.
Index Terms
- A multi-perspective digital library to facilitate integrating teaching research methods across the computing curriculum
Recommendations
A multi-perspective digital library to facilitate integrating teaching research methods across the computing curriculum
The <u>c</u>omputing <u>r</u>esearch <u>m</u>ethods (CRM) literature is scattered across discourse communities and published in specialty journals and conference proceedings. This dispersion has led to the use of inconsistent terminology when referring ...
Computing research methods multi-perspective digital library: a call for participation
ITiCSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationFor the past three years, SIGCSE has sponsored a design research project on teaching Computing Research Methods (CRM) [4]. The initial phase of the work included an ITiCSE working group that gathered a great deal of literature on and about: computing ...
Computing research methods multi-perspective digital library: a call for participation
ITiCSE '08For the past three years, SIGCSE has sponsored a design research project on teaching Computing Research Methods (CRM) [4]. The initial phase of the work included an ITiCSE working group that gathered a great deal of literature on and about: computing ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2007 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 December 2007
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
ITiCSE07
ITiCSE07: 12th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
December 1, 2007
Dundee, Scotland
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations3Total Citations
- 609Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)10
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in