Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

A case study of retention practices at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Published: 12 March 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Computer science is seeing a decline in enrollment at all levels of education. One key strategy for reversing this decline is to improve methods of student retention. This paper, based on a 10-month case study at the Department of Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, examines two aspects of student retention at both the graduate and undergraduate levels: community identity and community relationships. Our data shows that students feel isolated from each other, faculty, and members of the greater computer science community. Given our findings, we highlight existing programs and propose new programs which improve student-community interactions. While the lessons learned might not apply at every institution, they constitute a valuable case study for improving conditions for students at large research universities.

References

[1]
L. J. Barker. When do group projects widen the student experience gap? In ITiCSE '05: Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 276--280, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
[2]
L. Blum and C. Frieze. The evolving culture of computing: Similarity is the difference. Frontiers, 26, January 2005.
[3]
M. Charles and K. Bradley. Female underrepresentation in cs programs cross-nationally. In Women and Information Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2006.
[4]
A. S. Chasek. Family tools and technology. In New Formulas for America's Workforce: Girls in Science and Engineering. National Science Foundation, 2003.
[5]
J. M. Cohoon. Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, June 2002.
[6]
Computing Research News. 2005-2006 Taulbee Survey. May 2007.
[7]
T. L. Crenshaw, E. W. Chambers, H. Metcalf, and Thakkar. Recruitment, preparation, retention: A case study of computing culture at the university of illinois at urbana-champaign. University of Illinois Technical Report, UIUCDCS-R-2007-2811, January 2007.
[8]
J. Cuny and W. Aspray. Recruitment and retention of women in graduate students in computer science and engineering: Results of a workshop organized by the computing research association. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, June 2002.
[9]
D. Gurer and T. Camp. An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, June 2002.
[10]
E. Hammonds and B. Subramaniam. A conversation on feminist science studies. Signs, 28, 2003.
[11]
J. Handelsman, N. Cantor, M. Carnes, D. Denton, E. Fine, Grosz, V. Hinshaw, C. Marret, S. Rosser, D. Shalala, and J. Sheridan. More women in science. Science, 309, August 2005.
[12]
HERI/UCLA. CIRP freshman survey. 2007.
[13]
J. K. Jesse. Redesigning science: Recent scholarship on cultural change, gender, and diversity. BioScience, 56(10), October 2006.
[14]
J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, 2002.
[15]
C. McDowell, B. Hanks, and L. Werner. Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom. In ITiCSE '03: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 60--64, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
[16]
M. T. Nettles and C. M. Millett. Three Magic Letters: Getting to the Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
[17]
B. R. Ragins. Gender and mentoring relationships: A review and research agenda for the next decade. In Handbook of Gender and Work. SAGE Publications, 1999.
[18]
K. Ward. Research with undergraduates: a survey of best practices. J. Comput. Small Coll., 21(1):169--176, 2005.
[19]
T. P. Way. A virtual laboratory model for encouraging undergraduate research. In SIGCSE '06: Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 203--207, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
[20]
L. Williams, R. R. Kessler, W. Cunningham, and Jeffries. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software, 17(4), 2000.
[21]
Y. Xie and K. A. Shauman. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Harvard University Press, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)An investigation on primary school students’ dispositions towards programming with game-based learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-021-10430-526:4(3871-3892)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
  • (2016)Using app inventor to change perceptions about software engineering2016 35th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)10.1109/SCCC.2016.7836023(1-9)Online publication date: Oct-2016
  • (2010)Have we missed something?Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research10.1145/1839594.1839598(13-22)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2010
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A case study of retention practices at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
    ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 40, Issue 1
    SIGCSE 08
    March 2008
    549 pages
    ISSN:0097-8418
    DOI:10.1145/1352322
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '08: Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
      March 2008
      606 pages
      ISBN:9781595937995
      DOI:10.1145/1352135
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 March 2008
    Published in SIGCSE Volume 40, Issue 1

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. advising
    2. diversity
    3. graduate
    4. mentoring
    5. retention
    6. undergraduate

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)An investigation on primary school students’ dispositions towards programming with game-based learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-021-10430-526:4(3871-3892)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
    • (2016)Using app inventor to change perceptions about software engineering2016 35th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)10.1109/SCCC.2016.7836023(1-9)Online publication date: Oct-2016
    • (2010)Have we missed something?Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research10.1145/1839594.1839598(13-22)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2010
    • (2024)Does Curricular Complexity in Computer Science Influence the Representation of Women CS Graduates?Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630835(729-735)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2021)Computing Educational Activities Involving People Rather Than Things Appeal More to Women (CS1 Appeal Perspective)Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3446871.3469761(145-156)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2021
    • (2019)Underrepresented Groups Threats to Belonging in Computing2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985905(1-4)Online publication date: Feb-2019
    • (2018)Diversity Across a DecadeProceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3159450.3159497(610-615)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2018
    • (2018)Culturally Relevant CS Pedagogy - Theory & Practice2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491699(1-5)Online publication date: Feb-2018
    • (2017)The Underrepresentation of Women in Computing Fields: A Synthesis of Literature Using a Life Course PerspectiveIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2017.270406060:4(296-304)Online publication date: Nov-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media