Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1363686.1364080acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Autonomic management policy specification in Tune

Published: 16 March 2008 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Distributed software environments are increasingly complex and difficult to manage, as they integrate various legacy software with specific management interfaces. Moreover, the fact that management tasks are performed by humans leads to many configuration errors and low reactivity. This is particularly true in medium or large-scale distributed infrastructures.
    To address this issue, we explore the design and implementation of an autonomic management system. The main principle is to wrap legacy software pieces in components in order to administrate a software infrastructure as a component architecture. However, we observed that the interfaces of a component model are too low-level and difficult to use. Therefore, we introduced higher-level formalisms for the specification of deployment and management policies. This paper overviews these specification facilities that are provided in the Tune autonomic management system.

    References

    [1]
    G, Blair, G. Coulson, L. Blair, H. Duran-Limon, P, Grace, R. Morcira, and N. Parlavantzas. Reflection, self-awareness and sef-healing in openorb. In 1st Workshop on Self-Healing Systems, WOSS 2002, 2002.
    [2]
    E. Bruncton, T. Coupaye, M. Leclercq, V. Quéma, and J.-B. Stefani. The fractal component model and its support, in java. In Software - Practice, and Experience, special issue on "Experiences with Auto-adaptive and Reconfigurable Systems", 36(11--12):1257--1284, September 2006.
    [3]
    P, Combes, F. Lombard, M. Quinson, and F. Suter. A scalable approach to network enabled servers. In In 7th Asian Computing Science Conference, January 2002.
    [4]
    D, Garlan, S. Cheng, A. Huang, B. Schmerl, and P. Steenkiste, Rainbow: Architecture-based self adaptation with reusable infrastructure, in IEEE Computer, 37(10), 2004.
    [5]
    D, Hagimont, S. Bouchenak, N. D. Palma, and C. Taton. Autonomic, management of clustered applications, In IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, 2006.
    [6]
    J.- O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, The vision of autononic computing, In IEEE Computer Magazine, 36(1), 2003.
    [7]
    S, Microsystems, Java 2 platform enterprise edition (j2ee).
    [8]
    P, Oriezy, M. Gorlick, K, Taylor, G. Johnson, N. Medvidovic, A. Quilici, D. Rosenblum, and A. Wolf. An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. In IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3), 1999.
    [9]
    B, Urgaonkar, P. Shenoy, A, Chandra, and P. Goyal. Dynamic provisiong of multi-tier internet applications. In 2nd International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC-2005), Seattle, WA, June 2005.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Predictable Efficiency for Reconfiguration of Service-Oriented Systems with Concerto2020 20th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGRID)10.1109/CCGrid49817.2020.00-59(340-349)Online publication date: May-2020
    • (2017)Deployment Specification challenges in the context of large scale systemsProceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering10.5555/3172795.3172821(220-226)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2017
    • (2017)CHOPPER: an intelligent QoS-aware autonomic resource management approach for cloud computingCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-017-1040-z21:2(1203-1241)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
    March 2008
    2586 pages
    ISBN:9781595937537
    DOI:10.1145/1363686
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 March 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. administration
    2. autonomic system
    3. deployment
    4. reconfiguration

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SAC '08
    Sponsor:
    SAC '08: The 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 16 - 20, 2008
    Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Predictable Efficiency for Reconfiguration of Service-Oriented Systems with Concerto2020 20th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGRID)10.1109/CCGrid49817.2020.00-59(340-349)Online publication date: May-2020
    • (2017)Deployment Specification challenges in the context of large scale systemsProceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering10.5555/3172795.3172821(220-226)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2017
    • (2017)CHOPPER: an intelligent QoS-aware autonomic resource management approach for cloud computingCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-017-1040-z21:2(1203-1241)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017
    • (2017)Reliable self-deployment of distributed cloud applicationsSoftware—Practice & Experience10.1002/spe.240047:1(3-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
    • (2016)Probabilistic Model for M2M in IoT networking and communicationTelecommunications Systems10.1007/s11235-015-9982-z62:1(59-66)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
    • (2015)An adaptable framework to deploy complex applications onto multi-cloud platformsThe 2015 IEEE RIVF International Conference on Computing & Communication Technologies - Research, Innovation, and Vision for Future (RIVF)10.1109/RIVF.2015.7049894(169-174)Online publication date: Jan-2015
    • (2015)Automatic deployment of distributed software systemsJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.040103:C(198-218)Online publication date: 1-May-2015
    • (2015)Programming distributed and adaptable autonomous components-the GCM/ProActive frameworkSoftware—Practice & Experience10.1002/spe.227045:9(1189-1227)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015
    • (2014)Energy-QoS tradeoffs in J2EE hosting centresInternational Journal of Autonomic Computing10.1504/IJAC.2014.0591122:1(54-72)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014
    • (2014)Reliable self-deployment of cloud applicationsProceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/2554850.2554951(1331-1338)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media