Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1410140.1410166acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The CONCUR framework forcommunity maintenance of curated resources

Published: 16 September 2008 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing use of computational linguistics for semantic search and discovery tools requires much work on development and maintenance of associated ontologies. Related applications depend upon curated resources like dictionaries, gazetteers, etc. In order to scale these application models and leverage the respective communities of interest, a new set of tools is needed that facilitate community development and extension of these resources while retaining the curatorial model to ensure a reliable, high quality resource. We describe the requirements and principles for such a system, and present the CONCUR framework that addresses these needs. CONCUR defines a reputation model and a set of reusable infrastructure services to maintain the resource. The reputation model combines correctness as well as utility of participants' contributions, tracked over time and by sub-domain within the resource. We describe the architectural issues of the model, potential applications, and continuing research on the model.

References

[1]
Astudillo, H., et al., 2008. Contexta/SR: A multi-institutional semantic integration platform. In J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.). Museums and the Web 2008.
[2]
Bhat, V., Oates, T., Shanbhag, V., Nicholas, C., 2004. Finding aliases on the web using latent semantic analysis, Data & Knowledge Engineering 49 (2004) 129--143.
[3]
Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative, http://cdli.ucla.edu/.
[4]
Freebase, created by Metaweb Technologies. http://www.freebase.com/.
[5]
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2000) Nature Genet. 25: 25--29.
[6]
J. Paul Getty Trust, Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT). Available online (as of 6/10/2008) at: http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/vocabularies/aat/about.html.
[7]
Gil, Y. and Ratnakar, V., 2002. Trusting information sources one citizen at a time. In Proc. of the First International Semantic Web Conference, Sardinia, Italy.
[8]
Golbeck, J., Hendler, J. and Parsia B. 2003. Trust networks on the semantic web. In Proc. of Cooperative Intelligent Agents, 2003.
[9]
Ignat, C-L., Norrie, M., (2006). Supporting Customised Collaboration over Shared Document Repositories. CAiSE 2006: 190--204
[10]
Kuter, U., and Golbeck, J., 2007. Sunny: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks, using probabilistic confidence models. In Proc. of AAAI, 2007
[11]
Noy, N.F. Chugh, A. Alani, H., 2008. The CKC Challenge: Exploring Tools for Collaborative Knowledge Construction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Jan-Feb 2008.
[12]
Rector, A., et al., 2003. OpenGALEN: Open Source Medical Terminology and Tools. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2003.
[13]
Rutledge, L., Aroyo, L., Stash, N., 2006. Determining user interests about museum collections. WWW 2006: 855--856
[14]
Schmitz, P., 2006. Inducing Ontology from Flickr Tags. In Proc. of Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop, WWW '06.
[15]
Schmitz, P., and Black, M., 2008. The Delphi Toolkit: Enabling Semantic Search for Museum Collections. In J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.). Museums and the Web 2008.
[16]
Sunstein, C., 2006, Infotopia, How many minds produce knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York, NY
[17]
Whetzel, T., 2006. Pronto. Presentation given at MGED Ontology Workshop. MGED9 - Seattle, 2006.
[18]
Wu, H., Zubair, M., and Maly, K. 2006. Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies. In Proc. of the 17th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (2006).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DocEng '08: Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Document engineering
September 2008
312 pages
ISBN:9781605580814
DOI:10.1145/1410140
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 September 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. SOA
  2. community
  3. curation
  4. ontology
  5. structured information

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

DocEng '08
Sponsor:
DocEng '08: ACM Symposium on Document Engineering
September 16 - 19, 2008
Sao Paulo, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

DocEng '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 62 submissions, 34%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 194 of 564 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 130
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media