research-article

Can all tags be used for search?

Authors:

Kerstin Bischoff,

Claudiu S. Firan,

Wolfgang Nejdl,

Raluca PaiuAuthors Info & Claims

CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management

Pages 193 - 202

https://doi.org/10.1145/1458082.1458112

Published: 26 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Collaborative tagging has become an increasingly popular means for sharing and organizing Web resources, leading to a huge amount of user generated metadata. These tags represent quite a few different aspects of the resources they describe and it is not obvious whether and how these tags or subsets of them can be used for search. This paper is the first to present an in-depth study of tagging behavior for very different kinds of resources and systems - Web pages (Del.icio.us), music (Last.fm), and images (Flickr) - and compares the results with anchor text characteristics. We analyze and classify sample tags from these systems, to get an insight into what kinds of tags are used for different resources, and provide statistics on tag distributions in all three tagging environments. Since even relevant tags may not add new information to the search procedure, we also check overlap of tags with content, with metadata assigned by experts and from other sources. We discuss the potential of different kinds of tags for improving search, comparing them with user queries posted to search engines as well as through a user survey. The results are promising and provide more insight into both the use of different kinds of tags for improving search and possible extensions of tagging systems to support the creation of potentially search-relevant tags.

References

[1]

M. Ames and M. Naaman. Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In Proceedings SIGCHI, 2007.

Digital Library

[2]

S. Bao, X. Wu, B. Fei, G. Xue, Z. Su, and Y. Yu. Optimizing web search using social annotations. In Proceedings WWW, 2007.

Digital Library

[3]

S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7):107--117, 1998.

Digital Library

[4]

J. Cohen. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37--46, 1960.

[5]

B. D. Davison. Topical locality in the web. In Proceedings SIGIR, 2000.

Digital Library

[6]

B. D. Eugenio and M. Glass. The kappa statistic: A second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1):95--101, 2004.

Digital Library

[7]

C. S. Firan, W. Nejdl, and R. Paiu. The benefit of using tag-based profiles. In Proceedings LA-WEB, 2007.

Digital Library

[8]

S. A. Golder and B. A. Huberman. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2):198--208, 2006.

Digital Library

[9]

H. Halpin, V. Robu, and H. Shepherd. The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proceedings WWW, 2007.

Digital Library

[10]

P. Heymann, G. Koutrika, and H. Garcia-Molina. Can social bookmarking improve web search? In Proceedings WSDM, 2008.

Digital Library

[11]

A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. In Proceedings ESWC, 2006.

Digital Library

[12]

M.-Y. Kan. Web page categorization without the web page. In Proceedings WWW, 2004.

Digital Library

[13]

P. Knees, T. Pohle, M. Schedl, and G. Widmer. A music search engine built upon audio-based and web-based similarity measures. In Proceedings SIGIR, 2007.

Digital Library

[14]

R. Kraft and J. Zien. Mining anchor text for query refinement. In Proceedings WWW, 2004.

Digital Library

[15]

C. Marlow, M. Naaman, D. Boyd, and M. Davis. Ht06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. In Proceedings HYPERTEXT, 2006.

Digital Library

[16]

O. A. McBryan. GENVL and WWWW: Tools for Taming the Web. In Proceedings WWW, 1994.

[17]

M. Naaman, S. Harada, Q. Wang, H. Garcia-Molina, and A. Paepcke. Context data in geo-referenced digital photo collections. In Proceedings MULTIMEDIA '04, pages 196--203, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.

Digital Library

[18]

G. Pass, A. Chowdhury, and C. Torgeson. A picture of search. In Proceedings Infoscale, 2006.

Digital Library

[19]

S. Sen, S. K. Lam, A. M. Rashid, D. Cosley, D. Frankowski, J. Osterhouse, F. M. Harper, and J. Riedl. tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proceedings CSCW, 2006.

Digital Library

[20]

D. Shen, J.-T. Sun, Q. Yang, and Z. Chen. A comparison of implicit and explicit links for web page classification. In Proceedings WWW, 2006.

Digital Library

[21]

Z. Xu, Y. Fu, J. Mao, and D. Su. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions. WWW Workshop on Collaborative Web Tagging, 2006.

[22]

A. Zollers. Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression, performance, and activism. WWW Workshop on Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization, 2007.

Cited By

Čvirik M(2023)Are we living in a ‘Yellow Submarine’?Per Musi10.35699/2317-6377.2023.4803224(1-13)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-6377.2023.48032
Zheng JYang ZLiu W(2021)Understanding the causal structure among the tags in marketing systemsNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-020-05552-935:5(3615-3624)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05552-9
Lee SLee J(2020)Evaluating the Emotion-based Music Recommendation Model according to the Listening Contexts: Focus on Spotify ServiceJournal of Digital Contents Society10.9728/dcs.2020.21.7.130121:7(1301-1309)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.7.1301
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Can all tags be used for search?
1. Information systems
  1. Information retrieval
    1. Document representation
  2. World Wide Web
    1. Web applications
    2. Web services

Recommendations

Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation
RecSys '09: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems

Tagging systems have become major infrastructures on the Web. They allow users to create tags that annotate and categorize content and share them with other users, very helpful in particular for searching multimedia content. However, as tagging is not ...
Survey on social tagging techniques

Social tagging on online portals has become a trend now. It has emerged as one of the best ways of associating metadata with web objects. With the increase in the kinds of web objects becoming available, collaborative tagging of such objects is also ...
Tags weighting based on user profile
AMT'11: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Active media technology

The 'Collaborative Tagging' is gaining popularity on Web 2.0, this new generation of Web which makes user reader/writer. The 'Tagging' is a mean for users to express themselves freely through additions of label called 'Tags' to shared resources. One of ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management

October 2008

1562 pages

ISBN:9781595939913

DOI:10.1145/1458082

General Chair:
James G. Shanahan
Church and Duncan Group Inc, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Sihem Amer-Yahia
Yahoo! Research, USA
,
Ioana Manolescu
INRIA, France
,
Yi Zhang
University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
,
David A. Evans
JustSystems Evans Research, USA
,
Alek Kolcz
Microsoft Live Labs, USA
,
Key-Sun Choi
KAIST, Korea
,
Abdur Chowdury
Twitter, USA

Copyright © 2008 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CIKM08

Sponsor:

CIKM08: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

October 26 - 30, 2008

California, Napa Valley, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

196
Total Citations
View Citations
2,424
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)23
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Čvirik M(2023)Are we living in a ‘Yellow Submarine’?Per Musi10.35699/2317-6377.2023.4803224(1-13)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-6377.2023.48032
Zheng JYang ZLiu W(2021)Understanding the causal structure among the tags in marketing systemsNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-020-05552-935:5(3615-3624)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05552-9
Lee SLee J(2020)Evaluating the Emotion-based Music Recommendation Model according to the Listening Contexts: Focus on Spotify ServiceJournal of Digital Contents Society10.9728/dcs.2020.21.7.130121:7(1301-1309)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.7.1301
Chen CFeng SLiu ZXing ZZhao S(2020)From Lost to FoundProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34151944:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3415194
Tonge ACaragea C(2020)Image Privacy Prediction Using Deep Neural NetworksACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/338608214:2(1-32)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3386082
Zhao WHou YChen JZhu JYin ESu HWen J(2020)Learning Semantic Representations from Directed Social Links to Tag Microblog Users at ScaleACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/337755038:2(1-30)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3377550
Khalifi HDahir SEl Qadi AGhanou Y(2020)Enhancing information retrieval performance by using social analysisSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-020-00635-w10:1Online publication date: 8-Apr-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00635-w
Tonge ACaragea C(2019)Privacy-aware Tag Recommendation for Accurate Image Privacy PredictionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/333505410:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3335054
Nguyen Van Khan IShrestha PZhang MLiu YMa SGurrin CSchoeffmann KJoho HDang-Nguyen DRiegler MPiras L(2019)A Two-Level Lifelog Search Engine at the LSC 2019Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Lifelog Search Challenge10.1145/3326460.3329158(19-23)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3326460.3329158
Wildemann SHolzmann HDownie SZhu QHahn J(2019)Towards temporal URI collections for named entitiesProceedings of the 18th Joint Conference on Digital Libraries10.1109/JCDL.2019.00-68(241-250)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/JCDL.2019.00-68
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents