Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1516360.1516384acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesedbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

GADDI: distance index based subgraph matching in biological networks

Published: 24 March 2009 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Currently, a huge amount of biological data can be naturally represented by graphs, e.g., protein interaction networks, gene regulatory networks, etc. The need for indexing large graphs is an urgent research problem of great practical importance. The main challenge is size. Each graph may contain thousands (or more) vertices. Most of the previous work focuses on indexing a set of small or medium sized database graphs (with only tens of vertices) and finding whether a query graph occurs in any of these. In this paper, we are interested in finding all the matches of a query graph in a given large graph of thousands of vertices, which is a very important task in many biological applications. This increases the complexity significantly. We propose a novel distance measurement which reintroduces the idea of frequent substructures in a single large graph. We devise the novel structure distance based approach (GADDI) to efficiently find matches of the query graph. GADDI is further optimized by the use of a dynamic matching scheme to minimize redundant calculations. Last but not least, a number of real and synthetic data sets are used to evaluate the efficiency and scalability of our proposed method.

    References

    [1]
    R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
    [2]
    B. Berendt, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Towards semantic web mining. Proc. of ISWC, 2002.
    [3]
    J. Berg, and M. Lassig, Local graph alignment and motif search in biological networks, PNAS, 2004.
    [4]
    B. Bringmann, and S. Nijssen: What Is Frequent in a Single Graph? PAKDD 2008.
    [5]
    J. Cheng, Y. Ke, W. Ng, and A. Lu. FG-Index: Towards verification-free query processing on graph databases. Proc. of SIGMOD, 2007.
    [6]
    D. Cook, L. Holder, and S. Djoko. Knowledge discovery from structural data. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1995.
    [7]
    L. Cordella, P. Foggia, C. Sansone, and M. Vento. A (Sub)Graph Isomorphism Algorithm for Matching Large Graphs. PAMI, 2004.
    [8]
    T. Dandekar, S. Schuster, B. Snel, M. Huynen, and P. Bork, Pathway alignment: application to the comparative analysis of glycolytic enzymes, Biochem, 1999.
    [9]
    L. Dehaspe, H. Toivonen, and R. King. Finding frequent substructures in chemical compounds. Proc. of KDD, 1998.
    [10]
    M. Deshpande, M. Kuramochi, G. Karypis. Frequent sub-structure based approaches for classifying chemical compounds. Proc. of ICDE, 2003.
    [11]
    B. Dost, T. Shlomi, N. Gupta, E. Ruppin, V. Bafna, and R. Sharan. QNet: A Tool for Querying Protein Interaction Networks, Proc. of RECOMB, 2007.
    [12]
    M. Fiedler, and C. Borgelt: Subgraph Support in a Single Large Graph. Proc. of ICDM Workshops, 2007.
    [13]
    S. Ghazizadeh, and S. Chawathe. SEuS: Structure extraction using summaries. Proc. of ICDS, 2002.
    [14]
    D. Gibson, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Discovering Large Dense Subgraphs in Massive Graphs, Proc. of VLDB, 2005.
    [15]
    J. Gonzalez, L. Holder, and D. Cook. Application of graph-based concept learning to the predictive toxicology domain. Proc. of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge Workshop, 2001.
    [16]
    R. Giugno, D. Shasha, GraphGrep:, A Fast and Universal Method for Querying Graphs. Proc. of ICPR, 2002.
    [17]
    H. He and A. K. Singh. Closure-Tree: an index structure for graph queries. Proc. of ICDE, 2006.
    [18]
    H. He and A. K. Singh. Graphs-at-a-time: Query Language and Access Methods for Graph Databases, Proc. of SIGMOD, 2008.
    [19]
    J. Huan, W. Wang, J. Prins, and J. Yang. SPIN: mining maximal frequent subgraphs from graph databases. Proc. of KDD, 2004.
    [20]
    J. Huan, W. Wang, and J. Prins. Efficient mining of frequent subgraphs in the presence of isomorphism. Proc. of ICDM, 2003.
    [21]
    A. Inokuchi, T. Washio, and H. Motoda. An apriori-based algorithm for mining frequent substructures from graph data. Proc. of PDKK, 2000.
    [22]
    D. Jensen, and H. Goldberg. Artificial Intelligence and Link Analysis. AAAI Press, 1998.
    [23]
    H. Jiang, H. Wang, P. Yu, and S. Zhou. Gstring: A novel approach for efficient search in graph databases. Proc. of ICDE, 2007.
    [24]
    Y. Ke, J. Cheng, and W. Ng. Correlation search in graph databases. Proc. of SIGKDD, 2007.
    [25]
    J. Kleinberg, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. The Web as a graph: Measurements, models and methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1999.
    [26]
    C. Ko. 2000. Logic induction of valid behavior specifications for intrusion detection. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2000.
    [27]
    M. Koyuturk, A. Grama, and W. Szpankowski. An efficient algorithm for detecting frequent subgraphs in biological networks. Bioinformatics, 2004.
    [28]
    M. Koyuturk, A. Grama, and W. Szpankowski. Pairwise Local Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks Guided by Models of Evolution. RECOMB 2005.
    [29]
    M. Koyuturk, Y. Kim, U. Topkara, S. Subramaniam, W. Szpankowski, and A. Grama. Pairwise Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks, RECOMB 2005.
    [30]
    S. Kramer, L. De Raedt, and C. Helma. Molecular feature mining in HIV data. Proc. of KDD, 2001.
    [31]
    M. Kuramochi, and G. Karypis. Frequent subgraph discovery. Proc. of ICDE, 2001.
    [32]
    M. Kuramochi, G. Karypis, Finding Frequent Patterns in a Large Sparse Graph. DMKD, 2005.
    [33]
    W. Lee, and S. Stolfo. A framework for constructing features and models for intrusion detection systems. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2000.
    [34]
    R. Mooney, P. Melville, L. Tang, J. Shavlik, I. Castro Dutra, and D. Page. Relational data mining with inductive logic programming for link discovery. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 2004.
    [35]
    S. Nijssen and J. Kok. A quick start in frequent structure mining can make a difference Proc. of KDD, 2004.
    [36]
    C. Palmer, P. Gibbons, and C. Faloutsos. ANF: A fast and scalable tool for data mining in massive graphs. Proc. of KDD, 2002.
    [37]
    R. Pinter, O. Rokhlenko, E. Yeger-Lotem and M. Ziv-Ukelson, Alignment of metabolic pathways, Bioinformatics, 2005.
    [38]
    D. Shasha, J. Wang, and R. Giugno. Algorithmic and applications of tree and graph searching. PODS, 2002.
    [39]
    R. Singh, J. Xu, and B. Berger. Pairwise Global Alignment of Protein Interaction Networks by Matching Neighborhood Topology, RECOMB 07'.
    [40]
    Y. Tian and J. Patel. TALE: A Tool for Approximate Large Graph Matching, Proc. of ICDE, 2008.
    [41]
    J. Ullmann. An algorithm for subgraph isomorphism. J. ACM, 1976.
    [42]
    N. Vanetik, E. Gudes, and S. Shimony. Computing frequent graph patterns from semistructured data. Proc. of ICDM, 2002.
    [43]
    S. Wasserman, K. Faust, and D. Iacobucci. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    [44]
    D. Williams, J. Huan, and W. Wang. Graph database indexing using structured graph decomposition. Proc. of ICDE, 2007.
    [45]
    X. Yan and J. Han. gSpan: graph-based substructure pattern mining, Proc. of ICDM, 2002.
    [46]
    X. Yan, P. Yu, and J. Han. Graph indexing, a frequent structure-based approach. Proc. of Sigmod, 2004.
    [47]
    X. Yan, P. Yu, and J. Han. Substructure similarity search in graph databases. Proc. of Sigmod, 2005.
    [48]
    X. Yan, F. Zhu, J. Han, and P. Yu. Searching substructures with superimposed distance. Proc. of ICDE, 2006.
    [49]
    K. Yoshida, and H. Motoda. CLIP: Concept learning from inference patterns. Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
    [50]
    K. Yoshida, H. Motoda, and N. Indurkhya, Graph-based induction as a unified learning framework. Journal of Applied Intelligence, 1994.
    [51]
    S. Zhang, M. Hu, and J. Yang. Treepi: a new graph indexing method. Proc. of ICDE, 2007.
    [52]
    P. Zhao, J. X. Yu, and P. S. Yu. Graph indexing: tree + delta <= graph. Proc. of VLDB, 2007.
    [53]
    Lei Zou, Lei Chen, J. Yu, Y. Lu, A Novel Spectral Coding in a Large Graph Database, Proc. of EDBT, 2008.
    [54]
    Gene Ontology. http://www.geneontology.org/.
    [55]
    Social Network. http://www-personal.umich.edu/mejn/netdata/.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Improving the Relevance, Speed, and Computational Efficiency of Semantic Search through Database Indexing: A ReviewOptimization Algorithms - Classics and Recent Advances10.5772/intechopen.112232Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Wings: Efficient Online Multiple Graph Pattern Matching2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00260(3013-3027)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Efficient Multi-Query Oriented Continuous Subgraph Matching2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00250(3230-3243)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EDBT '09: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology
    March 2009
    1180 pages
    ISBN:9781605584225
    DOI:10.1145/1516360
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 March 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    EDBT/ICDT '09
    EDBT/ICDT '09: EDBT/ICDT '09 joint conference
    March 24 - 26, 2009
    Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 10 submissions, 70%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)181
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Improving the Relevance, Speed, and Computational Efficiency of Semantic Search through Database Indexing: A ReviewOptimization Algorithms - Classics and Recent Advances10.5772/intechopen.112232Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Wings: Efficient Online Multiple Graph Pattern Matching2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00260(3013-3027)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Efficient Multi-Query Oriented Continuous Subgraph Matching2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00250(3230-3243)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)GPU-Accelerated Batch-Dynamic Subgraph Matching2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00248(3204-3216)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Large Subgraph Matching: A Comprehensive and Efficient Approach for Heterogeneous Graphs2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00231(2972-2985)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Optimizing subgraph retrieval and matching with an efficient indexing schemeKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-024-02175-7Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Subgraph Matching of Spatiotemporal RDF DataUncertain Spatiotemporal Data Management for the Semantic Web10.4018/978-1-6684-9108-9.ch006(102-130)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Distributed Subgraph Query Processing Using Filtering Scores on SparkElectronics10.3390/electronics1217364512:17(3645)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2023
    • (2023)BICE: Exploring Compact Search Space by Using Bipartite Matching and Cell-Wide VerificationProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3598581.359859116:9(2186-2198)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)SUFF: Accelerating Subgraph Matching with Historical DataProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3587136.358714416:7(1699-1711)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media