Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Optimal placement of distributed sensors against moving targets

Published: 04 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of deploying a sparse network of sensors for surveillance of moving targets. The sensor networks of interest consist of sensors which perform independent binary detection on a target, and report detections to a central node for fusion. An optimization framework is developed for placement of sensors within a bounded search region, given sensor performance characteristics, prior information on anticipated target characteristics, and a distributed detection criteria. Individual sensor performance is represented parametrically as are priors on target dynamics. Several numerical examples are included that illustrate the utility of the optimization approach.

References

[1]
Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Comm. Mag. 40, 8, 102--114.
[2]
Benyuan, L. and Towsley, D. 2004. A study of the coverage of large scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems. 475--483.
[3]
Buczak, A. L., Wang, H., Darabi, H., and Jafari, M. A. 2001. Genetic algorithm convergence study for sensor network optimization. Inform. Sci. 133, 3--4, 267--282.
[4]
Chakrabarty, K., Iyengar, S. S., Qi, H., and Cho, E. 2002. Grid coverage for surveillance and target location in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 51, 12, 1448--1453.
[5]
Chamberland, J. F. and Veeravalli, V. V. 2003. Decentralized detection in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Sign. Process. 51, 2, 407--416.
[6]
Chung, K. L. 2001. A Course in Probability Theory, 3rd ed. Academic Press, London.
[7]
Clouqueur, T., Phipatanasuphorn, V., Ramanathan, P., and Saluja, K. K. 2002. Sensor deployment strategy for target detection. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications.
[8]
Dhillon, S. S. and Chakrabarty, K. 2003. Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Vol. 3. IEEE, 1609--1614.
[9]
Dudgeon, D. and Mersereau, R. 1984. Multidimensional Digital Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall.
[10]
Estrin, D., Culler, D., Pister, K., and Sukhatme, G. 2002. Connecting the physical world with pervasive networks. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 1, 1, 59--69.
[11]
Ferrari, S. 2006. Track coverage in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference. 2053--2059.
[12]
Fletcher, R. 1987. Practical Methods of Optimization, 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience.
[13]
Goldberg, D. E. 1999. Genetic Algorithms. Addison Wesley Longman.
[14]
Grimmett, G. R. and Stirzaker, D. R. 1992. Probability and Random Processes, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Han, S. P. 1977. A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming. J. Optimiz. Theor. Appl. 22, 3, 297--309.
[16]
Heo, N. and Varshney, P. K. 2005. Energy-efficient deployment of intelligent mobile sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A 35, 1, 78--92.
[17]
Howard, A., Mataric, M. J., and Sukhatme, G. S. 2002. An incremental self-deployment algorithm for mobile sensor networks. Autonom. Robots 13, 2, 113--126.
[18]
Martinez, S. and Bullo, F. 2006. Optimal sensor placement and motion coordination for target tracking. Automatica 42, 661--668.
[19]
McLachlan, G. and Peel, D. 2000. Finite Mixture Models. Wiley-Interscience.
[20]
Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2001. Exposure in wireless ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 139--150.
[21]
Musman, S. A., Lehner, P. E., and Elsaesser, C. 1997. Sensor planning for elusive targets. Math. Comp. Model. 25, 3, 103--115.
[22]
Niu, R., Varshney, P. K., and Cheng, Q. 2006. Distributed detection in a large wireless sensor network. Inform. Fusion 7, 380--394.
[23]
Owen, A. B. 2001. Empirical Likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
[24]
Penny, D. E. 1999. Multi-sensor management for passive target tracking in an anti-submarine warfare scenario. In Proceedings of the IEE Colloquium on Target Tracking: Algorithms and Applications. Vol. 3. 1--5.
[25]
Qi, H., Iyengar, S., and Chakrabarty, K. 2001. Distributed sensor networks-a review of recent research. J. Franklin Ins. 338, 6, 655--668.
[26]
Ram, S. S., Manjunath, D., Iyer, S. K., and Yogeshwaran, D. 2007. On the path coverage properties of random sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 6, 5 (May), 446--458.
[27]
Schittkowski, K. 1986. Nlqpl: A fortran-subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems. Annals Oper. Resear. 5, 2, 485--500.
[28]
Wan, P.-J. and Yi, C.-W. 2006. Coverage by randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52, 6, 2658--2669.
[29]
Wang, H., Yao, K., and Estrin, D. 2005. Information-theoretic approaches for sensor selection and placement in sensor networks for target localization and tracking. CENS Technical Report 52 1, 2, 301--306. available online at http://research.cens.ucla.edu.
[30]
Wettergren, T. A. 2008. Performance of search via track-before-detect for distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst. 44, 1, 314--325.
[31]
Wettergren, T. A., Costa, R., Baylog, J. G., and Grage, S. P. 2006. The optimization of deployment patterns for distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2006 INFORMS MAS Conference. INFORMS Military Applications Society, Mystic, CT.
[32]
Zhang, X. and Wicker, S. B. 2005. On the optimal distribution of sensors in a random field. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 1, 2, 301--306.
[33]
Zou, Y. and Chakrabarty, K. 2004. Sensor deployment and target localization in distributed sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 3, 1, 61--91.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Sampling-Based Approach for Achieving Desired Patterns of Probabilistic Coverage with Distributed Sensor NetworksSensors10.3390/s2313599923:13(5999)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Migration Dynamics for Adapting Sensor Coverage on the LineIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2023.331763023:22(27852-27861)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
  • (2021)The Dependence of Aggregation in the Determination of Optimal Sensor Configurations for Source LocalizationIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems10.1109/TAES.2021.306078857:4(2565-2574)Online publication date: Aug-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 5, Issue 3
May 2009
284 pages
ISSN:1550-4859
EISSN:1550-4867
DOI:10.1145/1525856
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 04 June 2009
Accepted: 01 July 2008
Revised: 01 March 2008
Received: 01 September 2007
Published in TOSN Volume 5, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Sensor networks
  2. coverage
  3. optimization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Sampling-Based Approach for Achieving Desired Patterns of Probabilistic Coverage with Distributed Sensor NetworksSensors10.3390/s2313599923:13(5999)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Migration Dynamics for Adapting Sensor Coverage on the LineIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2023.331763023:22(27852-27861)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
  • (2021)The Dependence of Aggregation in the Determination of Optimal Sensor Configurations for Source LocalizationIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems10.1109/TAES.2021.306078857:4(2565-2574)Online publication date: Aug-2021
  • (2018)Distributed Optimal Control of Sensor Networks for Dynamic Target TrackingIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems10.1109/TCNS.2016.25830705:1(142-153)Online publication date: Mar-2018
  • (2017)Optimal Planning of Distributed Sensor Layouts for Collaborative SurveillanceInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks10.1155/2013/1454969:4(145496)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2017
  • (2016)Optimal sensor-target geometries analysis for Angle-of-arrival localization2016 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC)10.1109/ICSPCC.2016.7753589(1-6)Online publication date: Aug-2016
  • (2015)Sensor Placement and Measurement of Wind for Water Quality Studies in Urban ReservoirsACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/270026511:3(1-27)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2015
  • (2013)Minimum-Cost Sensor Placement for Required Lifetime in Wireless Sensor-Target Surveillance NetworksIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2012.26324:9(1783-1796)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013
  • (2012)An Optimization Scheme for M2M-Based Patient Monitoring in Ubiquitous Healthcare DomainInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks10.1155/2012/7087628:4(708762)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2012
  • (2012)Optimal multiobjective placement of distributed sensors against moving targetsACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/2240092.22400958:3(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media