research-article

Enhancing information scent: identifying and recommending quality tags

Authors:

John M. CarrollAuthors Info & Claims

GROUP '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531676

Published: 10 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

We describe a scenario of tag use and an empirical study of tags as socio-cognitive artifacts providing information scent. We articulated a three-step use scenario of tags, and used it to conceptualize tag "quality" as determined by use. We designed and conducted a user study to explore what attributes of tags and taggers predict the user-rated "quality" of tags. We found that frequency best predicted tag quality, while information entropy provided further refinement. We found that people rated our identified quality tags as higher in quality than general tags. But these identified quality tags were not perceived as better than self-generated tags. We derived a regression model for tag quality and discussed implications for social computing.

References

[1]

Chi, E.H. and Mytkowicz, T. Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory. In Proc. Hypertext 2008, ACM, (2008), 81--88.

Digital Library

[2]

Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T.G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C.H., Carroll, J.M. and Giles, L. Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: metrics and design heuristics. In Proc. GROUP 2007, ACM, (2007), 351--360.

Digital Library

[3]

Muller, M. J. Comparing tagging vocabularies among four enterprise tag-based services. In Proc. GROUP 2007, ACM, (2007), 341--350.

Digital Library

[4]

Sen, S., Harper, F.M., LaPitz, A. and Riedl, J. The quest for quality tags. In Proc. GROUP 2007, ACM, (2007), 361--370.

Digital Library

[5]

Sen, S., Lam, S.K., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F.M. and Riedl, J. tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM, (2006), 181--190.

Digital Library

[6]

Pirolli, P. and Card, S. Information foraging in information access environments. In Proc. CHI 1995, ACM, (2008), 51--58.

Digital Library

[7]

Pirolli, P. and Card, S. Information Foraging. Psychological Review, 106, (1999), 643--675.

[8]

Russell, D., Stefik, M., Pirolli, P. and Card, S. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proc. CHI 1993. ACM, (1993), 269--276.

Digital Library

[9]

Carroll, J. M. Making use: a design representation. Communications of the ACM, 37, 12, (1994), 28--35.

Digital Library

[10]

Golder, S.A. and Huberman, B.A. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci., 32, 2 (2006), 198--208.

Digital Library

[11]

Cattuto, C., Baldassarri, A., Servedio, V.D.P. and Loreto, V. Vocabulary growth in collaborative tagging systems. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0704.3316, (2007).

[12]

Cattuto, C., Loreto, V. and Pietronero, L. Collaborative Tagging and Semiotic Dynamics. Arxiv preprint cs.CY/0605015, (2006).

[13]

Macgregor, G. and McCulloch, E. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review, 55, 5, (2006), 291--300.

[14]

Chi, E.H. and Mytkowicz, T. Understanding navigability of social tagging systems. In SigCHI alt.chi (2007).

[15]

Fu, W. T. The Microstructures of Social Tagging: A Rational Model. In Proc. CSCW 2008, ACM, (2008), 229--238.

Digital Library

[16]

Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M. and Dumais, S.T. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM, 30, 11, (1987), 964--971.

Digital Library

[17]

Furnas, G.W., Fake, C., von Ahn, L., Schachter, J., Golder, S., Fox, K., Davis, M., Marlow, C. and Naama, M. Why do tagging systems work? Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006 ACM, (2006), 36--39.

Digital Library

[18]

Shirky, C. Ontology is overrated. (2005). http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontologyoverrated.html.

[19]

Bush, V. As We May Think. Atlantic Monthly, 176, 1 (1945), 101--108.

[20]

Collins, A. M. and Loftus, E. F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 6, (1975), 407--428.

[21]

Norman, D. A. Cognitive Artifacts. In Carroll J.M. (eds) Designing Interaction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

Digital Library

[22]

Simon, H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, (1955), 99--118.

[23]

Klein, G. and Klinger, D. Naturalistic Decision Making. Human Systems IAC Gateway, 11, 3, (1991), 16--19.

[24]

Weick, K. E. Sense-making in organizations. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1996.

[25]

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, MA, 1953.

[26]

Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books, NY, 1966.

[27]

Halpin, H., Robu, V. and Shepherd, H. The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proc. WWW 2007, ACM, (2007), 211--220.

Digital Library

[28]

Resnick, P. and Varian, H. R. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40, 3, (1997), 56--58.

Digital Library

[29]

Vu, K. P. L., Hanley, G. L., Strybel, T. Z. and Proctor, R. W. Metacognitive Processes in Human-Computer Interaction: Self-Assessments of Knowledge as Predictors of Computer Expertise. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 1, (2000), 43--71.

[30]

McDonald, D. W. and Ackerman, M. S. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. In Proc. CSCW 2000, ACM (2000), 231--240.

Digital Library

[31]

Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proc CSCW 1992), ACM, (1992), 107--114.

Digital Library

[32]

Gutwin, C., Roseman, M. and Greenberg, S. A usability study of awareness widgets in a shared workspace groupware system. In Proc. CSCW 1996, ACM, (1996), 258--267.

Digital Library

[33]

Grudin, J. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organization of organizational interfaces. In Proc. CSCW 1988, ACM, (1988), 85--93.

Digital Library

[34]

Rodden, K. and Wood, K. R. How do people manage their digital photographs? In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM (2003), 409--416.

Digital Library

[35]

Slamecka, N. J. and Graf, P. The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 6, (1978), 592--604.

[36]

Tory, M. and Moller, T. Evaluating visualizations: do expert reviews work? Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 25, 5, (2005), 8--11.

Digital Library

Cited By

Allam HBliemel MSpiteri LBlustein JAli-Hassan H(2019)Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging toolsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.00545:C(211-222)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.005
Tong LLin HZhang P(2019)“I don't understand it so it can't be good”: Users' acg domain expertise and perceived quality of video tagsProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.17456:1(780-782)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2019
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.174
Suh HOh JYoon W(2016)Which Tags Do We Remember in Personal Information Management?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2016.118129132:7(568-583)Online publication date: 2-May-2016
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1181291
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Enhancing information scent: identifying and recommending quality tags
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Tag recommendation for social bookmarking: Probabilistic approaches
Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems

Tagging has become increasingly popular with the explosion of user-created content on the web. A 'tag' can be defined as a group of keywords that makes organizing, browsing and searching for content more efficient. Users apply tags to a variety of web-...
The value of socially tagged urls for a search engine
WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web

Social bookmarking has emerged as a growing source of human generated content on the web. In essence, bookmarking involves URLs and tags on them. In this paper, we perform a large scale study of the usefulness of bookmarked URLs from the top social ...
Authors vs. readers: a comparative study of document metadata and content in the www
DocEng '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Document engineering

Collaborative tagging describes the process by which many users add metadata in the form of unstructured keywords to shared content. The recent practical success of web services with such a tagging component like Flickr or del.icio.us has provided a ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

GROUP '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

May 2009

412 pages

ISBN:9781605585000

DOI:10.1145/1531674

General Chairs:
Stephanie Teasley
University of Michigan, USA
,
Erling Havn
Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
,
Program Chairs:
Wolfgang Prinz
Fraunhofer FIT, Germany
,
Wayne Lutters
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA

Copyright © 2009 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 May 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

GROUP09

Sponsor:

GROUP09: ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work

May 10 - 13, 2009

Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

Acceptance Rates

GROUP '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 110 submissions, 36%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Upcoming Conference

GROUP '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

January 12 - 15, 2025

Hilton Head , SC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
617
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)11
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Allam HBliemel MSpiteri LBlustein JAli-Hassan H(2019)Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging toolsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.00545:C(211-222)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.005
Tong LLin HZhang P(2019)“I don't understand it so it can't be good”: Users' acg domain expertise and perceived quality of video tagsProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.17456:1(780-782)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2019
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.174
Suh HOh JYoon W(2016)Which Tags Do We Remember in Personal Information Management?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2016.118129132:7(568-583)Online publication date: 2-May-2016
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1181291
Li LZhang CChung CBroder AShim KSuel T(2014)Quality evaluation of social tags according to web resource typesProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2567948.2578998(1123-1128)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2567948.2578998
Cress UHeld C(2012)Harnessing collective knowledge inherent in tag cloudsJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00491.x29:3(235-247)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2012
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00491.x
Allam HBlustein JBliemel MSpiteri L(2012)Exploring Factors Impacting Users' Attitude and Intention towards Social Tagging SystemsProceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences10.1109/HICSS.2012.267(3129-3138)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2012.267
Sawant NLi JWang J(2011)Automatic image semantic interpretation using social action and tagging dataMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-010-0650-851:1(213-246)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11042-010-0650-8

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents