Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1553374.1553488acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supervised learning from multiple experts: whom to trust when everyone lies a bit

Published: 14 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

We describe a probabilistic approach for supervised learning when we have multiple experts/annotators providing (possibly noisy) labels but no absolute gold standard. The proposed algorithm evaluates the different experts and also gives an estimate of the actual hidden labels. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method is superior to the commonly used majority voting baseline.

References

[1]
Dawid, A. P., & Skeene, A. M. (1979). Maximum likei-hood estimation of observed error-rates using the EM algorithm. Applied Statistics, 28, 20--28.
[2]
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39, 1--38.
[3]
Frank, E., & Hall, M. (2001). A simple approach to ordinal classification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 145--156.
[4]
Hui, S. L., & Zhou, X. H. (1998). Evaluation of diagnostic tests without a gold standard. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 7, 354--370.
[5]
Lugosi, G. (1992). Learning with an unreliable teacher. Pattern Recognition, 25, 79--87.
[6]
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998). A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. Learning in Graphical Models (pp. 355--368). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[7]
Sheng, V. S., Provost, F., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2008). Get another label? Improving data quality and data mining using multiple, noisy labelers. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 614--622).
[8]
Smyth, P. (1995). Learning with probabilistic supervision. In Computational learning theory and natural learning systems 3, 163--182. MIT Press.
[9]
Smyth, P., Fayyad, U., Burl, M., Perona, P., & Baldi, P. (1995). Inferring ground truth from subjective labelling of venus images. In Advances in neural information processing systems 7, 1085--1092.
[10]
Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. (2008). Cheap and Fast - But is it Good? Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 254--263).
[11]
Sorokin, A., & Forsyth, D. (2008). Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the First IEEE Workshop on Internet Vision at CVPR 08 (pp. 1--8).

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Learning From Crowds Using Graph Neural Networks With Attention MechanismIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2024.337810011:1(86-98)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Unbiased multi-label learning from crowdsourced annotationsProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3694289(54064-54081)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Self-cognitive denoising in the presence of multiple noisy label sourcesProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3693994(47261-47279)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICML '09: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
June 2009
1331 pages
ISBN:9781605585161
DOI:10.1145/1553374

Sponsors

  • NSF
  • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research
  • MITACS

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 June 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICML '09
Sponsor:
  • Microsoft Research

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 548 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Learning From Crowds Using Graph Neural Networks With Attention MechanismIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2024.337810011:1(86-98)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Unbiased multi-label learning from crowdsourced annotationsProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3694289(54064-54081)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Self-cognitive denoising in the presence of multiple noisy label sourcesProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3693994(47261-47279)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)DualPSNet: A Discrepant-Annotations-Driven Framework for Medical Image Segmentation from Dual-Polygon Supervision2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)10.1109/IJCNN60899.2024.10650187(1-8)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Crowdsourced geolocationCognitive Systems Research10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.10126688:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Drawing the Same Bounding Box Twice? Coping Noisy Annotations in Object Detection with Repeated LabelsPattern Recognition10.1007/978-3-031-54605-1_39(605-623)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Crowdsourcing Truth Inference Based on Label Confidence ClusteringACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/355654517:4(1-20)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Automated Detection of Corneal Edema With Deep Learning-Assisted Second Harmonic Generation MicroscopyIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics10.1109/JSTQE.2023.325868729:6: Photonic Signal Processing(1-10)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2023)TMETA: Trust Management for the Cold Start of IoT Services With Digital-Twin-Aided BlockchainIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2023.328510810:24(21337-21348)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Multi-Annotation Attention Model for Video Summarization2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00316(3143-3152)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media