Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1666091.1666117acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Avaliaçao subjetiva de qualidade aplicada à codificaçao de vídeo escalável

Published: 26 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a subjective video quality study of video sequences coded using the scalable extension of the H.264 standard (SVC). A group of experiments was performed to measure, primarily, the effects of transmission instability and the influence of the three scalability methods (spatial, temporal and quality) on the video quality. The definitions were based on a layered transmission system using protocols for adaptability and congestion control. To run the subjective assessment we used the ACR-HRR methodology and recommendations given by ITU-R Rec. BT.500 and ITU-T Rec. P.910. The results show that instability does not causes significant alterations on the overall video subjective quality and that the temporal scalability usually presents far lower subjective quality than spatial and quality scalabilities.

References

[1]
V. Baroncini. New Tendencies in Subjective Video Quality Evaluation. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, E89-A(11), Nov. 2006.
[2]
M. A. J. Barzilay, J. R. Taal, and R. L. Lagendijk. Subjective Quality Analysis of Bit Rate Exchange Between Temporal and SNR Scalability in the MPEG4 SVC Extension. In 2007 Fifteenth IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service, pages 285--288, Oct. 2007.
[3]
M. D. Brotherton, Q. Huynh-Thu, D. S. Hands, and K. Brunnstrom. Subjective Multimedia Quality Assessment. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer, E89-A(11):2920--2932, Nov. 2006.
[4]
C.-H. Hsu and M. Hefeeda. Structuring Multi-Layer Scalable Streams to Maximize Cient-Perceived Quality. In 2007 Fifteenth IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service, pages 182--187, June 2007.
[5]
ITU-R. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, June 2002. Rec. BT.500.
[6]
ITU-T. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, Sept. 1999. Rec. P.910.
[7]
F. Kozamernik, V. Steinmann, P. Sunna, and E. Wyckens. SAMVIQ - A New EBU Methodology for Video Quality Evaluations in Multimedia. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, April 2005.
[8]
B. Li and J. Liu. Multirate Video Multicast over the Internet: An Overview. IEEE Network, 17(1):24--29, 2003.
[9]
J. Li, M. Yuksel, X. Fan, and S. Kalyanaraman. Generalized multicast congestion control. Elsevier Computer Networks, 51(6):1421--1443, April 2007.
[10]
S. Maccanne, V. Jacobson, and M. Vetterli. Receiver-driven Layered Multicast. In Proc. of the ACM Sigcomm, pages 117--130, Stanford, California, USA, 1996. New York, ACM.
[11]
J. M. Monteiro and M. S. Nunes. A Subjective Quality Estimation Tool for the Evaluation of Video Communication Systems. IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, pages MW-75--MW-80, July 2007.
[12]
J.-R. Ohm. Advances in Scalable Video Coding. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(1):42--56, Jan. 2005.
[13]
V. Roesler. SAM: um sistema adaptativo para transmissao e recepçao de sinais multimídia em redes de computadores. PhD thesis, Instituto de Informática, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2003.
[14]
H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, and T. Wiegand. Overview of the Scalable Video Coding Extension of the H.264/AVC Standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 17(9):1103--1120, Sept. 2007.
[15]
L. Vicisano, L. Rizzo, and J. Crowcroft. TCP-like Congestion Control for Layered Multicast Data Transfer. In Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, California, USA, 1998. New York, IEEE.
[16]
VQEG. Multimedia Group Test Plan, Draft Version 1.21, March 2008.
[17]
J. Widmer and M. Handley. Extending Equation-based Congestion to Multicast Applications. SIGCOMM, 2001.
[18]
T. Wiegand, G. Sullivan, J. Reichel, H. Schwarz, and M. Wien. Joint Draft ITU-T Rec. H.264 | ISO/IEC 14496-10 / Amd.3 Scalable video coding, July 2007. Document: JVT-X201.
[19]
T. Wiegand, G. J. Sullivan, G. Bjøntegaard, and A. Luthra. Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(7):560--576, July 2003.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WebMedia '08: Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
October 2008
269 pages
ISBN:9781605581705
DOI:10.1145/1666091

Sponsors

  • SBC: Brazilian Computer Society

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. H.264 SVC
  2. avaliaçao
  3. avaliaçao de qualidade de vídeo
  4. avaliaçao subjetiva de qualidade
  5. codificaçao de vídeo escalável
  6. controle de congestionamento
  7. multicast

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WebMedia08
Sponsor:
  • SBC

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 270 of 873 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 46
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 01 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media