Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1718487.1718530acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic generation of bid phrases for online advertising

Published: 04 February 2010 Publication History

Abstract

One of the most prevalent online advertising methods is textual advertising. To produce a textual ad, an advertiser must craft a short creative (the text of the ad) linking to a landing page, which describes the product or service being promoted. Furthermore, the advertiser must associate the creative to a set of manually chosen bid phrases representing those Web search queries that should trigger the ad. For efficiency, given a landing page, the bid phrases are often chosen first, and then for each bid phrase the creative is produced using a template. Nevertheless, an ad campaign (e.g., for a large retailer) might involve thousands of landing pages and tens or hundreds of thousands of bid phrases, hence the entire process is very laborious.
Our study aims towards the automatic construction of online ad campaigns: given a landing page, we propose several algorithmic methods to generate bid phrases suitable for the given input. Such phrases must be both relevant (that is, reflect the content of the page) and well-formed (that is, likely to be used as queries to a Web search engine). To this end, we use a two phase approach. First, candidate bid phrases are generated by a number of methods, including a (mono-lingual) translation model capable of generating phrases contained within the text of the input as well as previously "unseen" phrases. Second, the candidates are ranked in a probabilistic framework using both the translation model, which favors relevant phrases, as well as a bid phrase language model, which favors well-formed phrases.
Empirical evaluation based on a real-life corpus of advertiser-created landing pages and associated bid phrases confirms the value of our approach, which successfully re-generates many of the human-crafted bid phrases and performs significantly better than a pure text extraction method.

References

[1]
V. Abhishek and K. Hosanagar. Keyword generation for search engine advertising using semantic similarity between terms. In EC '07, pages 89--94, 2007.
[2]
A. Broder, P. Ciccolo, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, and L. Riedel. Search advertising using Web relevance feedback. In Proc. of CIKM, 2008.
[3]
A. Broder, P. Ciccolo, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, D. Metzler, L. Riedel, and J. Yuan. Online expansion of rare queries for sponsored search. In Proc. of WWW, 2009.
[4]
A. Broder, M. Fontoura, V. Josifovski, and L. Riedel. A semantic approach to contextual advertising. In SIGIR'07, pages 559--566. ACM Press, 2007.
[5]
P. Brown, V. Della Pietra, S. Della Pietra, and R. Mercer. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):263--311, 1993.
[6]
W. Chang, P. Pantel, A.-M. Popescu, and E. Gabrilovich. Towards intent-driven bidterm suggestion. In WWW '09, pages 1093--1094, 2009.
[7]
Y. Chen, G.-R. Xue, and Y. Yu. Advertising keyword suggestion based on concept hierarchy. In WSDM'08, 2008.
[8]
T. Doi, H. Yamamoto, and E. Sumita. Example-based machine translation using efficient sentence retrieval based on edit-distance. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing (TALIP), 4(4):377--399, 2005.
[9]
freekeywords.wordtracker.com. Retrieved Aug. 13, 2009.
[10]
J.C. French, A.L. Powell, and E. Schulman. Applications of approximate word matching in information retrieval. In Proc. of CIKM, 1997.
[11]
A. Fuxman, P. Tsaparas, K. Achan, and R. Agrawal. Using the wisdom of the crowds for keyword generation. In WWW'08, pages 61--70, 2008.
[12]
adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal. Retrieved Aug. 13, 2009.
[13]
www.google.com/sktool. Retrieved Aug. 13, 2009.
[14]
T. Joachims. Training linear svms in linear time. In Proc. of SIGKDD, 2006.
[15]
A. Joshi and R. Motwani. Keyword generation for search engine advertising. In ICDMW'06, pages 490--496, 2006.
[16]
K. Knight and D. Marcu. Statistics-based summarization -- step one: Sentence compression. In Proc. of AAAI, 2000.
[17]
C. Lin. ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Proc. of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out, ACL (WAS), 2004.
[18]
C. Lin and E. Hovy. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proc. of NAACL/HLT, 2003.
[19]
C. Lin and F.J. Och. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using longest common subsequence and skip-bigram statistics. In Proc. of ACL, 2004.
[20]
A. Lopez. Statistical machine translation. ACM Comput. Surv., 40(3):1--49, 2008.
[21]
advertising.microsoft.com/search-advertising/advertising-intelligence/keyword-suggestion. Retrieved Aug. 13, 2009.
[22]
V. Murdock, M. Ciaramita, and V. Plachouras. A noisy-channel approach to contextual advertising. In ADKDD Workshop, KDD, 2007.
[23]
G. Navarro. Improved approximate pattern matching on hypertext. Theor. Comput. Sci., 237(1-2):455--463, 2000.
[24]
G. Navarro. A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Comput. Surv., 33(1):31--88, 2001.
[25]
F.J. Och and H. Ney. Improved statistical alignment models. In Proc. of ACL, 2000.
[26]
M.F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3):130--137, 1980.
[27]
C. Quirk, C. Brockett, and W. Dolan. Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 142--149, 2004.
[28]
F. Radlinski, A. Broder, P. Ciccolo, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, and L. Riedel. Optimizing relevance and revenue in ad search: A query substitution approach. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 403--410, 2008.
[29]
S. Ravi and K. Knight. Learning phoneme mappings for transliteration without parallel data. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL, pages 37--45, 2009.
[30]
B. Ribeiro-Neto, M. Cristo, P.B. Golgher, and E.S. de Moura. Impedance coupling in content-targeted advertising. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2005.
[31]
C.E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. volume 27, pages 379--423, 1948.
[32]
C. Wang, P. Zhang, R. Choi, and M.D. Eredita. Understanding consumers attitude toward advertising. In 8th Americas Conference on Information Systems, pages 1143--1148, 2002.
[33]
H. Wu, G. Qiu, X. He, Y. Shi, M. Qu, J. Shen, J. Bu, and C. Chen. Advertising keyword generation using active learning. In WWW'09, pages 1095--1096, 2009.
[34]
W. Yih, J. Goodman, and V.R. Carvalho. Finding advertising keywords on Web pages. In Proc. of WWW, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Ad creative generation using reinforced generative adversarial networkElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-022-09564-6Online publication date: 5-May-2022
  • (2020)Extreme Regression for Dynamic Search AdvertisingProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3336191.3371768(456-464)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Domain-Constrained Advertising Keyword GenerationThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313570(2448-2459)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Automatic generation of bid phrases for online advertising

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '10: Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
    February 2010
    468 pages
    ISBN:9781605588896
    DOI:10.1145/1718487
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 February 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. content match
    2. sponsored search

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Ad creative generation using reinforced generative adversarial networkElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-022-09564-6Online publication date: 5-May-2022
    • (2020)Extreme Regression for Dynamic Search AdvertisingProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3336191.3371768(456-464)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2020
    • (2019)Domain-Constrained Advertising Keyword GenerationThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313570(2448-2459)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
    • (2019)AiAdsProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3292500.3330782(1881-1890)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
    • (2019)Personalized Attraction Enhanced Sponsored Search with Multi-task LearningProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3292500.3330659(2632-2642)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
    • (2019)Keyword Optimization in Sponsored Search AdvertisingIEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2019.289359034:1(32-42)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
    • (2018)ParabelProceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3178876.3185998(993-1002)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2018
    • (2015)Sponsored Search AuctionsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/26681085:4(1-34)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2015
    • (2015)Maximizing Influence of Spatio-Textual Objects Based on Keyword SelectionAdvances in Spatial and Temporal Databases10.1007/978-3-319-22363-6_22(413-430)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2015
    • (2014)TopicMachine: Conversion Prediction in Search Advertising Using Latent Topic ModelsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2014.231386826:11(2846-2858)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media