Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1830761.1830851acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evolving solutions in evolutionary optimization based on a dynamic system model

Published: 07 July 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Due to stochastic nature, the success of evolutionary methodologies in search for solutions to optimization problems depends greatly on the harmonization between exploration and exploitation. However, the difficulties in compromising on these two properties properly make the design of an efficient evolutionary algorithm (EA) become one of the laborious tasks. In this paper, a novel EA based on a dynamic system model is proposed. The algorithm composes two evolutionary stages, namely attraction and mutation. Using information about location and fitness of the best individual within the current population, the attraction stage guides candidate solutions toward new locations closer to the best according to a dynamic-system-model-based guidance technique, which is designed to be favorable for exploitation yet retain local diversity. In an opposite manner, the mutation stage, whose role is much the same as in many other EAs, probabilistically changes the values of individuals' elements so as to increase the population diversity and promote the exploration of potential search areas. An early version of the proposed approach was applied to real-valued optimization on a number of benchmark functions. Preliminary results demonstrate that the algorithm is promisingly effective in finding near-optimal solutions to problems where a trade-off between the exploration and exploitation is a must.

References

[1]
K. Austin. Evolutionary Design of Robust Flight Control for a Hypersonic Aircraft. PhD Dissertation, The Univeristy of Queensland, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2002.
[2]
M. L. F. Herrera, E. Herrear-Viedma and J. Verdegay. Fuzzy tools to improve genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, pages 1532--1539, 1994.
[3]
Z. Janikow and Z. Michalewicz. An experimental comparison of binary and floating point representations in genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA 1991), pages 31--36, 1991.
[4]
Z. Michalewicz. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, 1996.
[5]
A. Neubauer. A theoretical analysis of the non-uniform mutation operator for the modified genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 93--96, 1997.
[6]
X. Yao, Y. Liu and G. Lin. Evolutionary programming made faster. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(2):82--102, 1999.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '10: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2010
1496 pages
ISBN:9781450300735
DOI:10.1145/1830761
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 July 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. attraction operator
  2. dynamic system model
  3. evolutionary algorithm
  4. spiral movement

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

GECCO '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 69
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media