Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Proposal for evaluation of software reusability assessment approach employing a mixed method

Published: 22 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Software engineering, as an engineering discipline, is still quite young as compared to other engineering disciplines. The software engineering research community has made enormous contributions in past decades to lay down its foundations. However, the research methodologies in software engineering are still not mature. One of the reasons in this regard is the inherent complexity of this field. In this paper, we focus on one aspect of this field -- the evaluation of reusability assessment approaches. We begin by reviewing existing ways of comparing reusability assessment approaches. Following this we propose a different approach. This includes a mixture of both subjective and objective evaluation of a reusability assessment approach. This is novel in that we feel that subjective evaluation has been neglected by other approaches.

References

[1]
Burgin, M., Lee, H.K. and Debnath, N. 2004. Software technological roles, usability, and reusability. In Information Reuse and Integration, 2004. IRI 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on, 210--214.
[2]
Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A. and Damian, D. 2008. Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, 285--311.
[3]
Goulão, M. and Abreu, F.B. 2004. Software Components Evaluation: an Overview. In 5th Conferência da APSI, Lisbon.
[4]
Gray, D.E. 2009. Doing Research in the Real World. SAGE Publication Ltd.
[5]
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J. and Graham, W.F. 1989. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11, 255--274.
[6]
IEEE 1990. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, NY, USA.
[7]
Jackson, M. 2008. The Name and Nature of Software Engineering. In Advances in Software Engineering: Lipari Summer School 2007, Lipari Island, Italy, July 8-21, 2007, Revised Tutorial Lectures Springer-Verlag, 1--38.
[8]
Lazaro, M. and Marcos, E. 2006. An Approach to the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Software Engineering Research. In 2nd International Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Information Systems Engineering (PHISE'06) LNCS. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[9]
Lincke, R. and Lowe, W. 2007. Compendium of Software Quality Standards and Metrics - Version 1.0.
[10]
Mandić, V., Markkula, J. and Oivo, M. 2009. Towards Multi-Method Research Approach in Empirical Software Engineering. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 96--110.
[11]
Mingers, J. 2001. Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Information Systems Research 12, 240--259.
[12]
Seaman, C.B. 1999. Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25, 557--572.
[13]
Shaw, M. 2002. What makes good research in software engineering? International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 4, 1--7.
[14]
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. 1998. Mixed Methodology Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[15]
Wood, M., Daly, J., Miller, J. and Roper, M. 1999. Multimethod research: An empirical investigation of object-oriented technology. Journal of Systems and Software 48, 13--26.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Using a multi-method approach to understand Agile software product linesInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.00457(527-542)Online publication date: Jan-2015
  • (2014)Taxonomy, Definition, Approaches, Benefits, Reusability Levels, Factors and Adaption of Software Reusability: A Review of the Research LiteratureJournal of Applied Sciences10.3923/jas.2014.2396.242114:20(2396-2421)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 35, Issue 5
September 2010
134 pages
ISSN:0163-5948
DOI:10.1145/1838687
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2010
Published in SIGSOFT Volume 35, Issue 5

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. interview
  2. mixed method
  3. qualitative evaluation
  4. quantitative evaluation
  5. reusability assessment approach

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Using a multi-method approach to understand Agile software product linesInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.00457(527-542)Online publication date: Jan-2015
  • (2014)Taxonomy, Definition, Approaches, Benefits, Reusability Levels, Factors and Adaption of Software Reusability: A Review of the Research LiteratureJournal of Applied Sciences10.3923/jas.2014.2396.242114:20(2396-2421)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media