Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1868630.1868632acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cross-layer approach for supporting QoS in IEEE802.11 DCF wireless LANs

Published: 20 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a cross-layer approach for supporting the quality of service (QoS) of bidirectional real-time applications in IEEE802.11 DCF WLANs. In the proposal, the class-based queueing with the priority queue (PQ) scheduler is exploited in network layer at the access point (AP), and real-time applications are given the highest priority. In order to regulate the best effort traffic sent from wireless stations, we apply the MAC-frame Receive Opportunity Control (ROC), in which the AP intentionally does not return the ACK frame with a given probability when receiving a data frame of best effort traffic from a wireless station. By the intentional failure in acknowledging the receipt of frames, the ROC can control the packet sending rate on a per-station basis. The class-based queueing in network layer and the ROC in MAC layer are jointly utilized with the TCP window control in transport layer to provide the QoS guarantee for bidirectional real-time applications. The proposed cross-layer approach requires only the upgrade of the hardware (or software) of the AP, which is an important advantage over existing proposals on the QoS support in WLANs. The extensive simulation experiments reveal that, when best-effort TCP flows compete with voice conversations (VCs) in a WLAN, the proposed cross-layer approach provides better QoS to VCs than IEEE802.11e and, when best-effort UDP flows compete with VCs, the proposed approach and IEEE802.11e provides the same level of QoS to VCs.

References

[1]
IEEE Standard 802.11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE 802.11 Std., 1999.
[2]
IEEE Standard 802.11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications: Medium access control (MAC) Quality of Service (QoS) Enhancements. IEEE 802.11e Std., 2005.
[3]
A. Bai, T. Skeie, and P. Engelstad. A model-based admission control for 802.11e EDCA using delay predictions. In IEEE IPCCC, 2007.
[4]
A. Bazzi, M. Diolaiti, and G. Pasolini. Measurement based call admission control strategies in infrastructured IEEE 802.11 WLANs. In IEEE PIMRC, 2005.
[5]
G. Bianchi. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3):535--547, 2000.
[6]
C. Chou, S. Shankar, and K. Shin. Achieving per-stream QoS with distributed airtime allocation and admission control in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.
[7]
D. J. Deng, C. H. Ke, H. Chen, and Y. M. Huang. Contention window optimization for IEEE 802.11 DCF access control. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 7(12):5129--5135, 2008.
[8]
D. Gao, J. Cai, and K. Ngan. Admission control in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs. IEEE Network, 19(4):6--13, 2005.
[9]
D. Gross and C. Harris. Fundamentals of Queueing Systems, 3rd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
[10]
D. Gu and J. Zhang. A new measurement-based admission control method for IEEE 802.11 wireless local area networks. In IEEE PIMRC, 2003.
[11]
M. Komatsu and S. Shioda. A cross-layer analysis for evaluating the voice conversation performance over wireless LANs. In IEEE PIMRC, 2009.
[12]
D. Malone, K. Duffy, and D. Leith. Modelling the 802.11 distributed coordination function in non-saturated heterogeneous conditions. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 15(1):159--172, 2007.
[13]
T. Murase, K. Uchiyama, Y. Hirano, S. Shioda, and S. Sakata. Mac-frame receiving opportunity control for flow QoS in wireless LANs. IEICE Trans. Commun., E92-B(1):102--113, 2009.
[14]
P. Patil and V. Apte. An autonomous distributed admission control scheme for IEEE 802.11 DCF. In The Fourth International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness, 2007.
[15]
D. Pong and T. Moors. Call admission control for IEEE 802.11 contention access mechanism. In IEEE Globecom, 2003.
[16]
Y. Xiao and H. Li. Evaluation of distributed admission control for the IEEE 802.11e EDCA. IEEE Commun. Magazine, 42(9):s20--s24, 2004.
[17]
Y. Xiao, H. Li, and S. Choi. Protection and guarantee for voice and video traffic in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.
[18]
H. Zhai, Y. Kwon, and Y. Fang. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11 MAC protocols in wireless LANs. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 4:917--931, 2004.
[19]
H. Zhai, J. Wang, and Y. Fang. Providing statistical QoS guarantee for Voice over IP in the IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. IEEE Wireless Commun. Magazine, 13(1):36--43, 2006.
[20]
J. Zhu and A. Fapojuwo. A new call admission control method for providing desired throughputs and delay performance in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 6(2):701--49, 2007.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
Q2SWinet '10: Proceedings of the 6th ACM workshop on QoS and security for wireless and mobile networks
October 2010
118 pages
ISBN:9781450302753
DOI:10.1145/1868630
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 October 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cross layer
  2. quality of service
  3. tcp
  4. voice over ip
  5. wireless lan

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MSWiM '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Q2SWinet '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 16 of 54 submissions, 30%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 46 of 131 submissions, 35%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 149
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media