Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1869790.1869842acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Topological reasoning between complex regions in databases with frequent updates

Published: 02 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Reasoning about space has been a considerable field of study both in Artificial Intelligence and in spatial information theory. Many applications benefit from the inference of new knowledge about the spatial relationships between spatial objects on the basis of already available and explicit spatial relationship knowledge that we call spatial (relationship) facts. Hence, the task is to derive new spatial facts from known spatial facts. A considerable amount of work has focused on reasoning about topological relationships (as a special and important subset of spatial relationships) between simple spatial objects like simple regions. There is a common consensus in the GIS and spatial database communities that simple regions are insufficient to model spatial reality and that complex region objects are needed that allow multiple components and holes. Models for topological relationships between complex regions have already been developed. Hence, as the next logical step, the goal of this paper is to develop a reasoning model for them. Further, no reasoning model considers changes of the spatial fact basis stored in a database between consecutive queries. We show that conventional modeling suffers from performance degradation when the database is frequently changing. Our model does not assume any geometric representation model or data structure for the regions. The model is also backward compatible, i.e., it is also applicable to simple regions.

References

[1]
A. Abdelmoty and B. El-Geresy. A general method for spatial reasoning in spatial databases. In 4th Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 312--317, 1995.
[2]
P. V. Beek. On the minimality and decomposability of constraint networks. In In Proc. of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 447--452, 1992.
[3]
Z. Cui, A. Cohn, and D. Randell. Qualitative and topological relationships in spatial databases. Int. Symposium on Advances in Spatial Databases, pages 296--315, 1993.
[4]
R. Dechter. Constraint networks. Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, 1:276--285, 1992.
[5]
M. Egenhofer. Reasoning about binary topological relations. In 2nd Int. Symp. on Advances in Spatial Databases, pages 143--160, 1991.
[6]
M. Egenhofer. Deriving the composition of binary topological relations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 5(2):133--149, 1994.
[7]
M. Egenhofer and J. Herring. Categorizing binary topological relations between regions, lines, and points in geographic databases. Technical Report, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME, 1994.
[8]
D. Eppstein. Finding the k shortest paths. SIAM Journal on Computing, 28(2):652--673, 1999.
[9]
M. Grigni, D. Papadias, and C. Papadimitriou. Topological inference. In 14th Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 901--907, 1995.
[10]
V. Haarslev and R. Moller. SBox: A qualitative spatial reasoner's progress report. In 11th Int. Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, pages 3--6, 1997.
[11]
A. K. Mackworth and E. C. Freuder. The complexity of some polynomial network consistency algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 25(1):65--74, 1985.
[12]
R. Maddux. Some algebras and algorithms for reasoning about time and space. Internal paper, Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 1989.
[13]
Randell, D. A., Z. Cui, and A. G. Cohn. A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 1992.
[14]
J. Renz and B. Nebel. On the complexity of qualitative spatial reasoning: A maximal tractable fragment of the region connection calculus. Artificial Intelligence, 108(1):69--123, 1999.
[15]
M. Schneider. Spatial data types for database systems: finite resolution geometry for geographic information systems. Springer Verlag, 1997.
[16]
M. Schneider and T. Behr. Topological relationships between complex spatial objects. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 31(1):81, 2006.
[17]
T. Smith and K. Park. Algebraic approach to spatial reasoning. Int. Journal of Geographical Information Science, 6(3):177--192, 1992.
[18]
A. Tarski. On the calculus of relations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6(3):73--89, 1941.
[19]
A. M. University, A. K. Mackworth, and E. C. Freuder. The complexity of constraint satisfaction revisited. Artificial Intelligence, 59:57--62, 1993.
[20]
M. Vasardani and M. Egenhofer. Comparing relations with a multi-holed region. Spatial Information Theory, pages 159--176, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Geospatial Narratives and Their Spatio-Temporal Dynamics: Commonsense Reasoning for High-Level Analyses in Geographic Information SystemsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi30101663:1(166-205)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2014
  • (2012)Exploiting qualitative spatial reasoning for topological adjustment of spatial dataProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems10.1145/2424321.2424351(229-238)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2012

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GIS '10: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
November 2010
566 pages
ISBN:9781450304283
DOI:10.1145/1869790
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. GIS
  2. complex region
  3. spatial database
  4. topological relationship

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

GIS '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Geospatial Narratives and Their Spatio-Temporal Dynamics: Commonsense Reasoning for High-Level Analyses in Geographic Information SystemsISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information10.3390/ijgi30101663:1(166-205)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2014
  • (2012)Exploiting qualitative spatial reasoning for topological adjustment of spatial dataProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems10.1145/2424321.2424351(229-238)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2012

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media