Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1871437.1871585acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Organizing query completions for web search

Published: 26 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

All state-of-the-art web search engines implement an auto-completion mechanism - an assistive technology enabling users to effectively formulate their search queries by predicting the next characters or words that they are likely to type. Query completions (or suggestions) are typically mined from past user interactions with the search engine, e.g., from query logs, clickthrough patterns, or query reformulations; they are ranked by some measure of query popularity, e.g., query frequency or clickthrough rate. Current query suggestion tools largely assume that the set of suggestions provided to the users is homogeneous, corresponding to a single real-world interpretation of the query. In this paper, we hypothesize that, in some cases, users would benefit from an alternative presentation of the suggestions, one where suggestions are not only ordered by likelihood but also organized by high-level user intent. Rich search suggestion interaction frameworks that reduce the user effort in identifying the set of relevant suggestions open new and promising directions towards improving user experience. Along these lines, we propose clustering the set of suggestions presented to a search engine user, and assigning an appropriate label to each subset of suggestions to help users quickly identify useful ones. For this, we present a variety of unsupervised clustering techniques for search suggestions, based on the information available to a large-scale web search engine. We evaluate our novel search suggestion presentation techniques on a real-world dataset of query logs. Based on a set of user studies, we show that by extending the existing assistance layer to effectively group suggestions and label them - while accounting for the query popularity - we substantially increase the user's satisfaction.

References

[1]
E. Amigí, J. Gonzalo, J. Artiles, and F. Verdejo. A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints. Information Retrieval, 12(4):461--486, 2009.
[2]
D. Beeferman and A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In KDD, 2000.
[3]
P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, D. Donato, and Sebastiano. Query suggestions using query-flow graphs. In WSCD 09, 2009.
[4]
P. Boldi, F. Bonchi, C. Castillo, and S. Vigna. From 'dango' to 'japanese cakes': Query Reformulation Models and Patterns. In WI, 2009.
[5]
D. Bollegala, Y. Matsuo, and M. Ishizuka. Measuring semantic similarity between words using web search engines. In WWW, 2007.
[6]
A. Budanitsky and G. Hirst. Evaluating wordnet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Computational Linguistics, 2006.
[7]
D. Carmel, H. Roitman, and N. Zwerdling. Enhancing cluster labeling using wikipedia. In SIGIR 2009, 2009.
[8]
S. Chien and N. Immorlica. Semantic similarity between search engine queries using temporal correlation. In WWW, 2005.
[9]
S.-L. Chuang and L.-F. Chien. A practical web-based approach to generating topic hierarchy for text segments. In CIKM, 2004.
[10]
C. Y. Chung, R. Lieu, J. Liu, A. Luk, J. Mao, and P. Raghavan. Thematic mapping - from unstructured documents to taxonomies. In CIKM 2002, 2002.
[11]
K. Church and B. Thiesson. The wild thing! In ACL, 2005.
[12]
D. R. Cutting, D. R. Karger, J. O. Pedersen, and J. W. Tukey. Scatter/Gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In SIGIR'92, pages 318--329, 1992.
[13]
J. J. Darragh and I. H. Witten. The Reactive Keyboard. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
[14]
S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, and H. Chen. Optimizing search by showing results in context. In CHI, 2001.
[15]
N. Glance. Community search assistant. In IUI, 2001.
[16]
R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madni, and W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In WWW, 2006.
[17]
G. Li, S. Ji, C. Li, and J. Feng. Efficient type-ahead search on relational data: a tastier approach. In SIGMOD, 2009.
[18]
D. Lin. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In ACL, 1998.
[19]
J. P. Marques De Sá. Applied Statistics. Springer Verlag, 2003.
[20]
Q. Mei, D. Zhou, and K. Church. Query suggestion using hitting time. In CIKM, 2008.
[21]
P. Pantel and D. Ravichandran. Automatically labeling semantic classes. In HLT-NAACL, 2004.
[22]
E. Sadikov, J. Madhavan, L. Want, and A. Halevy. Clustering query refinements by user intent. In WWW, 2010.
[23]
M. Sahami and T. Heilman. A Web-based kernel function for measuring the similarity of short text snippets. In WWW, 2006.
[24]
P. Treeratpituk and J. Callan. Automatically labeling hierarchical clusters. In DG 06, 2006.
[25]
P. D. Turney. Mining the web for synonyms: Pmi-ir versus lsa on toefl. In ECML, 2001.
[26]
J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and H.-J. Zhang. Query clustering using user logs. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2002.
[27]
W.-T. Yih and C. Meek. Improving similarity measures for short segments of text. In IAAI, 2007.
[28]
Z. Zhang and O. Nasraoui. Mining search engine query logs for query recommendation. In WWW, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Query expansion based on clustering and personalized information retrievalProgress in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s13748-019-00178-yOnline publication date: 4-Mar-2019
  • (2016)Click-based Hot Fixes for Underperforming Torso QueriesProceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/2911451.2911500(195-204)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2016
  • (2015)Semantic association ranking schemes for information retrieval applications using term association graph representationSadhana10.1007/s12046-015-0413-340:6(1793-1819)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Organizing query completions for web search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '10: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
    October 2010
    2036 pages
    ISBN:9781450300995
    DOI:10.1145/1871437
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 October 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. auto-complete
    2. clustering
    3. query suggestions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CIKM '10

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Query expansion based on clustering and personalized information retrievalProgress in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s13748-019-00178-yOnline publication date: 4-Mar-2019
    • (2016)Click-based Hot Fixes for Underperforming Torso QueriesProceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/2911451.2911500(195-204)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2016
    • (2015)Semantic association ranking schemes for information retrieval applications using term association graph representationSadhana10.1007/s12046-015-0413-340:6(1793-1819)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2015
    • (2014)Extending Faceted Search to the General WebProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2661829.2661964(839-848)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2014
    • (2014)Users’ Information Search Behavior in a Professional Search Environment:Professional Search in the Modern World10.1007/978-3-319-12511-4_3(23-44)Online publication date: 2014
    • (2013)Analyzing, Detecting, and Exploiting Sentiment in Web QueriesACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB)10.1145/25355258:1(1-28)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013
    • (2012)Topic based query suggestions for video searchProceedings of the 18th international conference on Advances in Multimedia Modeling10.1007/978-3-642-27355-1_28(288-299)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2012

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media