Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features

Published: 06 March 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Recent feasibility studies involving children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) interacting with socially assistive robots have shown that some children have positive reactions to robots, while others may have negative reactions. It is unlikely that children with ASD will enjoy any robot 100% of the time. It is therefore important to develop methods for detecting negative child behaviors in order to minimize distress and facilitate effective human-robot interaction. Our past work has shown that negative reactions can be readily identified and classified by a human observer from overhead video data alone, and that an automated position tracker combined with human-determined heuristics can differentiate between the two classes of reactions. This paper describes and validates an improved, non-heuristic method for determining if a child is interacting positively or negatively with a robot, based on Gaussian mixture models (GMM) and a naive-Bayes classifier of overhead camera observations. The approach achieves a 91.4% accuracy rate in classifying robot interaction, parent interaction, avoidance, and hiding against the wall behaviors and demonstrates that these classes are sufficient for distinguishing between positive and negative reactions of the child to the robot.

References

[1]
Robotic tools for prosodic training for children with asd: A case study. In International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR), London, UK, 2008.
[2]
O. Boiman and M. Irani. Detecting irregularities in images and in video. International Journal of Computer Vision, 74(1):17--31, 2007.
[3]
M. Chan, A. Hoogs, J. Schmiederer, and M. Petersen. Detecting rare events in video using semantic primitives with HMM. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), volume 4, pages 150--154, Cambridge, England, UK, 2004.
[4]
K. Dautenhahn, I. Werry, J. Rae, P. Dickerson, P. Stribling, and B. Ogden. Robotic playmates: Analysing interactive competencies of children with autism playing with a mobile robot. In K. Dautenhahn, A. Bond, L. Canamero, and B. Edmonds, editors, Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, pages 117--124. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
[5]
A. Efros, A. Berg, G. Mori, and J. Malik. Recognizing action at a distance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 726--733, Nice, France, 2003.
[6]
H. Eng, K. Toh, A. Kam, J. Wang, and W. Yau. An automatic drowning detection surveillance system for challenging outdoor pool environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 532--539, Nice, France, 2003.
[7]
D. J. Feil-Seifer and M. J. Matarić. Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In 11th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics 2008, volume 54, pages 201--210, Athens, Greece, Jul 2008. Springer.
[8]
D. J. Feil-Seifer and M. J. Matarić. Using proxemics to evaluate human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 143--144, Osaka, Japan, Mar 2010.
[9]
D. Geschwind, J. Sowinski, C. Lord, P. Iverson, L. Ducat, and S. Spence. The autism genetic resource exchange: A resource for the study of autism and related neuropsychiatric conditions. American Journal of Human Genetics, 69:461--463, 2001.
[10]
R. Kelley, A. Tavakkoli, C. King, M. Nicolescu, M. Nicolescu, and G. Bebis. Understanding human intentions via hidden markov models in autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pages 367--374, Amsterdam, Netherlands, March 2008.
[11]
H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and Y. Yasuda. Children-robot interaction: a pilot study in autism therapy. Prog Brain Res, 164:385--400, 2007.
[12]
H. Kozima, Y. Yasuda, and C. Nakagawa. Social interaction facilitated by a minimally-designed robot: Finding from longitudinal therapeutic practices for autistic children. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 599--604, August 2007.
[13]
C. Lord, S. Risi, L. Lambrecht, E. H. C. Jr., B. L. Leventhal, P. C. DiLavore, A. Pickles, and M. Rutter. The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3):205--223, Jun 2000.
[14]
C. Lord, M. Rutter, and A. L. Couteur. Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5):659--685, Oct 1994.
[15]
S. Park and J. Aggarwal. Semantic-level understanding of human actions and interactions using event hierarchy. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12--12, 2004.
[16]
D. Ramanan and D. Forsyth. Automatic annotation of everyday movements. In S. Thrun, L. Saul, and B. Schölkopf, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, Cambridge, MA, 2004. MIT Press.
[17]
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Boekhorst, and A. Billard. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2):105--120, 2005.
[18]
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boekhorst, and C. Nehaniv. Behaviour delay and robot expressiveness in child-robot interactions: a user study on interaction kinesics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 17--24, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2008. ACM New York, NY, USA.
[19]
B. Scassellati. Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. In IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), pages 585--590, Nashville, TN, Aug 2005.
[20]
G. Schwarz. Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2):461--464, 1978.
[21]
S. Sparrow, D. Balla, and D. Cicchetti. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Test Corp of Amer, 1984.
[22]
T. Xiang and S. Gong. Beyond tracking: Modelling activity and understanding behaviour. International Journal of Computer Vision, 67(1):21--51, 2006.
[23]
H. Zhong, J. Shi, and M. Visontai. Detecting Unusual Activity in Video. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 819--826, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interactive Robots: Therapy RobotsEtkileşimli Robotlar: Terapi RobotlarıPsikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar10.18863/pgy.124295816:1(16-30)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Socially Assisted Robotics as an Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum DisorderUsing Assistive Technology for Inclusive Learning in K-12 Classrooms10.4018/978-1-6684-6424-3.ch002(24-41)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Robot-Assisted Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A ReviewJournal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems10.1007/s10846-023-01872-9108:3Online publication date: 24-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
March 2011
526 pages
ISBN:9781450305617
DOI:10.1145/1957656
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • RA: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society
  • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc
  • The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
  • IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Society

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. asd
  2. behavior modeling
  3. human-robot interaction
  4. socially assistive robotics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI'11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interactive Robots: Therapy RobotsEtkileşimli Robotlar: Terapi RobotlarıPsikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar10.18863/pgy.124295816:1(16-30)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Socially Assisted Robotics as an Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum DisorderUsing Assistive Technology for Inclusive Learning in K-12 Classrooms10.4018/978-1-6684-6424-3.ch002(24-41)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Robot-Assisted Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A ReviewJournal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems10.1007/s10846-023-01872-9108:3Online publication date: 24-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Application of IoT for Proximity Analysis and Alert Generation for Maintaining Social DistancingKey Digital Trends Shaping the Future of Information and Management Science10.1007/978-3-031-31153-6_2(12-22)Online publication date: 16-May-2023
  • (2022)Social Robots for Pedagogical RehabilitationResearch Anthology on Inclusive Practices for Educators and Administrators in Special Education10.4018/978-1-6684-3670-7.ch044(800-820)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Tele-robotic recommendation framework using multi-dimensional medical datasets on COVID-19 classificationInternational Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES10.21833/ijaas.2022.02.0179:2(152-159)Online publication date: Feb-2022
  • (2022)Configuring Humans: What Roles Humans Play in HRI Research2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889496(478-492)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Real-Time Social Robot’s Responses to Undesired Interactions Between Children and their SurroundingsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-022-00889-815:4(621-629)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2022
  • (2021)Impacts of Human Robot Proxemics on Human Concentration-Training Games with Humanoid RobotsHealthcare10.3390/healthcare90708949:7(894)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Case study assessing the feasibility of using a wearable haptic device or humanoid robot to facilitate transitions in occupational therapy sessions for children with autism spectrum disorderJournal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering10.1177/205566832110490418(205566832110490)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media