Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1962300.1962323acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Linking search tasks with low-level eye movement patterns

Published: 25 August 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Motivation -- On-the-task detection of the task type and task attributes can benefit personalization and adaptation of information systems.
Research approach -- A web-based information search experiment was conducted with 32 participants using a multi-stream logging system. The realistic tasks were related directly to the backgrounds of the participants and were of distinct task types.
Findings/Design -- We report on a relationship between task and individual reading behaviour. Specifically we show that transitions between scanning and reading behaviour in eye movement patterns are an implicit indicator of the current task.
Research limitations/Implications -- This work suggests it is plausible to infer the type of information task from eye movement patterns. One limitation is a lack of knowledge about the general reading model differences across different types of tasks in the population. Although this is an experimental study we argue it can be generalized to real world text-oriented information search tasks.
Originality/Value -- This research presents a new methodology to model user information search task behaviour. It suggests promise for detection of information task type based on patterns of eye movements.
Take away message -- With increasingly complex computer interaction, knowledge about the type of information task can be valuable for system personalization. Modelling the reading/scanning patterns of eye movements can allow inference about the task type and task attributes.

References

[1]
Belkin, N. (2008) Some(what) grand challenges for information retrieval. SIGIR Forum 42(1), 47--54.
[2]
Bierig, R., Cole., M.J., & Gwizdka, J. (2009). A user-centered experiment and logging framework for interactive information retrieval. In N.J. Belkin, R. Bierig, G. Buscher, L. van Elst, J. Gwizdka, J. Jose, et al. (Eds), CEUR Workshop Proceedings: 512. Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on Understanding the User: Logging and interpreting user interactions in information search and retrieval, UIIR'2009 (pp. 8--11). Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
[3]
Buscher, G., Dengel, A., & Van Elst, L. (2008) Eye movements as implicit relevance feedback. In Proceedings of CHI '08 (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM, pp. 2991--2998.
[4]
Buscher, G., Dengel, A., & Van Elst, L. (2008) Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level. In Proceedings of SIGIR '08 (Singapore, July 2008), ACM, pp. 387--394.
[5]
Byström, K., & Jäärvelin, K. (1995) Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management 31(2), 191--213.
[6]
Conati, C., Merton, C., Muldner, K., & Ternes, D. (2005) Exploring eye tracking to increase bandwidth in user modeling. In Proceedings of User Modeling 2005 (Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2005), L. Ardissomo, P. Brna, & A. Mitrovic, Eds., Springer-Verlag, pp. 357--366.
[7]
Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2009) Social navigation support for information seeking. In UMAP 2009, Springer, pp. 66--77.
[8]
Findlay, J., & Gilchrist, I. (2003) Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.
[9]
Granka, L., Joachims, T., & Gay, G. (2004) Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. In Proceedings of SIGIR '04 (Sheffield, UK, July 2004), ACM, New York, pp. 478--479.
[10]
Guan, Z., & Cutrell, E. (2007) An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search. In Proceedings of CHI '07 (San Jose, CA, USA, May 2007), ACM, p. 420.
[11]
Hayhoe, M.M., Droll, J., & Mennie, N. (2007) Learning where to look. In R.P.G. van Gompel, M.H. Fischer, W.S. Murray, & R.L. Hill, (Eds.) Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, ch. 30, pp. 642--659 Elsevier, New York.
[12]
Kelly, D., & Belkin, N.J. (2004) Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. In Proceedings of SIGIR '04 (Sheffield, UK, July 2004), ACM New York pp. 377--384.
[13]
Li, Y. (2009) Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 275--291.
[14]
Liu, J. & Belkin, N.J. (2010) Personalizing Information Retrieval for Multi-Session Tasks: The Roles of Task Stage and Task Type, In Proceedings of SIGIR '10 (Geneva, Switzerland, July 2010), ACM, New York.
[15]
Lorigo, L., Haridasan, M., Bryniarsodttir, H., Xia, L., Joachims, T., Gay, G., Granka, L., Pellacini, F., & Pan, B. (2008) Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1041--1052.
[16]
Oliveira, F.T., Aula, A., & Russell, D.M. (2009) Discriminating the relevance of web search results with measures of pupil size. In Proceedings of CHI '09 (Boston, MA, USA, April 2009), ACM, pp. 2209--2212.
[17]
Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. (1996) Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics 58(5), 734--747.
[18]
Rayner, K., Li, X., Williams, C.C., Cave, K.R., & Well, A. (2007) Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research 50(21), 2714--2726.
[19]
Rayner, K., Reichle, E.D., & Pollatsek, A. (1998) Eye movement control in reading: An overview and model. In G. Underwood (Ed) Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, pp. 243--268, Elsevier, Oxford.
[20]
Rayner, K., Smith, T.J., Malcomb, G.L., & Henderson, J.M. (2009) Eye movements and visual encoding during scene perception. Psychological Science 20 (1), 6--10.
[21]
Rayner, K., White, S., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. (2003) On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In R. Radach, J. Hyona, & F. H. Deubel (Eds.) The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, pp. 213--234 Elsevier. New York.
[22]
Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006) E--Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research 7(1), 4--22.
[23]
Reingold, E., & Rayner, K. (2006) Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the EZ Reader model. Psychological Science 17(9), 742--746.
[24]
Sherman, C. (2005) A new f-word for Google search results. Search Engine Watch.
[25]
Terai, H., Saito, H., Egusa, Y., Takaku, M., Miwa, M., & Kando, N. (2008) Differences between informational and transactional tasks in information seeking on the web. In Proceedings of IIiX '08 (London, UK, October 2008), ACM New York, pp. 152--159.
[26]
Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M., & Henderson, J.M. (2006) Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 113 (4), 766--786.
[27]
Triesch, J., Ballard, D.H., Hayhoe, M.M., & Sullivan, B.T. (2003) What you see is what you need. Journal of Vision 3(1), 86--94.
[28]
White, R.W., & Kelly, D. (2006) A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In Proceedings of CIKM '06 (Arlington, Virginia, USA, November 2006), ACM, New York, pp. 297--306.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Mining Eye-Tracking Data for Text SummarizationInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.222782740:17(4887-4905)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • (2020)Personalization in text information retrievalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2423471:3(349-369)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Readability and word complexity of SERPs snippets and web pages on children’s search queriesAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0124Online publication date: Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ECCE '10: Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
August 2010
380 pages
ISBN:9781605589466
DOI:10.1145/1962300

Sponsors

  • TNO: Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research
  • EACE: European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 August 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cognitive task
  2. eye movements
  3. information search
  4. interactive information retrieval
  5. personalization
  6. user models
  7. user study

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ECCE '10
Sponsor:
  • TNO
  • EACE
ECCE '10: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
August 25 - 27, 2010
Delft, Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Mining Eye-Tracking Data for Text SummarizationInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.222782740:17(4887-4905)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • (2020)Personalization in text information retrievalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2423471:3(349-369)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Readability and word complexity of SERPs snippets and web pages on children’s search queriesAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0124Online publication date: Mar-2019
  • (2016)Risk and Ambiguity in Information Seeking: Eye Gaze Patterns Reveal Contextual Behavior in Dealing with UncertaintyFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2016.017907Online publication date: 17-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Rationale and Architecture for Incorporating Human Oculomotor Plant Features in User Interest ModelingProceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/2854946.2854992(281-284)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2016
  • (2015)A term-based methodology for query reformulation understandingInformation Retrieval Journal10.1007/s10791-015-9251-518:2(145-165)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2015
  • (2014)A review of users' search contexts for lifelogging system designProceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium10.1145/2637002.2637040(271-274)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2014
  • (2014)Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search sessionProceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval10.1145/2600428.2609633(607-616)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2014
  • (2014)You have e-mail, what happens next? Tracking the eyes for genreInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2013.08.00550:1(175-198)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014
  • (2013)Inferring user knowledge level from eye movement patternsInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2012.08.00449:5(1075-1091)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media