Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1985793.1985977acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The quamoco tool chain for quality modeling and assessment

Published: 21 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Continuous quality assessment is crucial for the long-term success of evolving software. On the one hand, code analysis tools automatically supply quality indicators, but do not provide a complete overview of software quality. On the other hand, quality models define abstract characteristics that influence quality, but are not operationalized. Currently, no tool chain exists that integrates code analysis tools with quality models. To alleviate this, the Quamoco project provides a tool chain to both define and assess software quality. The tool chain consists of a quality model editor and an integration with the quality assessment toolkit ConQAT. Using the editor, we can define quality models ranging from abstract characteristics down to operationalized measures. From the quality model, a ConQAT configuration can be generated that can be used to automatically assess the quality of a software system.

References

[1]
B. W. Boehm. Characteristics of Software Quality. North-Holland, 1978.
[2]
F. Deissenboeck, E. Juergens, B. Hummel, S. Wagner, M. y Parareda, and M. Pizka. Tool support for continuous quality control. IEEE Software, 25(5):60--67, 2008.
[3]
F. Deissenboeck, S. Wagner, M. Pizka, S. Teuchert, and J.-F. Girard. An Activity-Based Quality Model for Maintainability. In Proc. of the ICSM'07, 2007.
[4]
R. G. Dromey. A model for software product quality. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 21(2):146--162, 1995.
[5]
B. Kitchenham, S. G. Linkman, A. Pasquini, and V. Nanni. The SQUID approach to defining a quality model. Software Qual. J., 6(3):211--233, 1997.
[6]
M. Kläs, C. Lampasona, S. Nunnenmacher, S. Wagner, M. Herrmannsdörfer, and K. Lochmann. How to Evaluate Meta-Models for Software Quality? In Proc. of MetriKon'10. 2010.
[7]
M. Kläs, K. Lochmann, and L. Heinemann. Evaluating a Quality Model for Software Product Assessment - A Case Study. In Proc. of SQMB'11 (to appear), 2011.
[8]
C. Marinescu, R. Marinescu, R. F. Mihancea, D. Ratiu, and R. Wettel. iPlasma: An Integrated Platform for Quality Assessment of Object-Oriented Design. In Proc. of the ICSM'05. 2005.
[9]
R. Plösch. Software-Verkostung. 23.04.2010. http://www.ipo.jku.at/dokumente/upload/Software%20Verkostung%20Impulsvortrag.pdf.
[10]
H. Schackmann, M. Jansen, and H. Lichter. Tool Support for User-Defined Quality Assessment Models. In Proc. of MetriKon'09. 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Requirements quality research: a harmonized theory, evaluation, and roadmapRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-023-00405-y28:4(507-520)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2023
  • (2020)Software Product Quality Models, Developments, Trends, and EvaluationSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-020-00140-z1:3Online publication date: 8-May-2020
  • (2020)Classification and evaluation of IoT brokers: A methodologyInternational Journal of Network Management10.1002/nem.2115Online publication date: 19-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '11: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering
May 2011
1258 pages
ISBN:9781450304450
DOI:10.1145/1985793
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2011

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. quality assessment
  2. quality modeling
  3. tool chain

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICSE11
Sponsor:
ICSE11: International Conference on Software Engineering
May 21 - 28, 2011
HI, Waikiki, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Requirements quality research: a harmonized theory, evaluation, and roadmapRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-023-00405-y28:4(507-520)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2023
  • (2020)Software Product Quality Models, Developments, Trends, and EvaluationSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-020-00140-z1:3Online publication date: 8-May-2020
  • (2020)Classification and evaluation of IoT brokers: A methodologyInternational Journal of Network Management10.1002/nem.2115Online publication date: 19-Jun-2020
  • (2019)An extensible data-driven approach for evaluating the quality of microservice architecturesProceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3297280.3297400(1225-1234)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2019
  • (2019)An Extension of the QUAMOCO Quality Model to Specify and Evaluate Feature-Dependent Non-Functional Requirements2019 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)10.1109/SEAA.2019.00012(19-28)Online publication date: Aug-2019
  • (2019)Towards Continuous Quality: Measuring and Evaluating Feature-Dependent Non-Functional Requirements in DevOps2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00024(91-94)Online publication date: Mar-2019
  • (2015)Continuous and Focused Developer Feedback on Software Quality (CoFoDeF) Research Ideas and Outcomes10.3897/rio.1.e75761(e7576)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2015
  • (2015)Operationalised product quality models and assessmentInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.00962:C(101-123)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2015
  • (2014)Continuous Product-Focused Project Monitoring with Trend Patterns and GQMProceedings of the 2014 21st Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference - Volume 0210.1109/APSEC.2014.96(69-74)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014
  • (2014)HASARDRelating System Quality and Software Architecture10.1016/B978-0-12-417009-4.00005-3(123-156)Online publication date: 2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media