research-article

Six principles for redesigning executive information systems—findings of a survey and evaluation of a prototype

Authors:

Jörg H. Mayer,

Robert WinterAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), Volume 2, Issue 4

Article No.: 26, Pages 1 - 19

https://doi.org/10.1145/2070710.2070717

Published: 05 January 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Information Systems (IS) meant to help senior managers are known as Executive Information Systems (EIS). Despite a five-decade tradition of such IS, many executives still complain that they bear little relevance to managing a company and, even more, fail to accommodate their working style. The increasing acceptance of IS among today's executives and technological advances of the Internet era make the present moment favorable for redesigning EIS. Following the design science paradigm in IS research, this article provides six principles for such a redesign. To do so, we survey executives regarding their requirements and the IS they currently use. We then derive principles for a redesign to fill the gaps. They address diverse areas: a comprehensive information model, functions to better analyze and process information, easy-to-use IS handling, a more flexible IS architecture and data model, a proper information management, and fast prototype implementation. Finally a field test demonstrates and evaluates the utility of our proposal by means of a prototype.

References

[1]

Ackoff, R. L. 1967. Management misinformation systems. Manag. Sci. 14, 147--156.

Digital Library

[2]

Adam, F. and Pomerol, J.-C. 2002. Critical factors in the development of executive systems: Leveraging the dashboard approach. In Mora, M., Forgionne, G. A. and Gupta, J. N. D. Decision Making Support Systems: Achievements, Trends and Challenges for the New Decade. Idea Group, Hershey, 287--304.

Digital Library

[3]

Arnott, D. and Pervan, G. 2008. Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline. Decis. Support Syst. 44, 657--672.

Digital Library

[4]

Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., Rivard, S., and Gara, M.-F. 1995. Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model. Decis. Support Syst. 14, 131--146.

Digital Library

[5]

Byun, D. H. and Suh, E. H. 1994. A builder's introduction to executive information systems. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 14, 357--368.

Digital Library

[6]

Cano Giner, J. L., Fernandez, V., and Diaz Boladeras, M. 2009. Framework for the analysis of executive information systems based on the perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use. Intang. asset 5, 370--286.

[7]

Chen, M. 1995. A model-driven approach to accessing managerial information: The development of a repository-based executive information system. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 11, 33--63.

Digital Library

[8]

Cheung, W. and Babin, G. 2006. A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part A): A flexible and adaptable architecture. Decis. Support Syst. 42, 1589--1598.

Digital Library

[9]

Clark Jr, T. D., Jones, M. C., and Armstrong Curtis, P. 2007. The dynamic structure of management support systems: Theory development, research focus, and direction. MIS Quart. 31, 579--615.

Digital Library

[10]

Crockett, F. 1992. Revitalizing executive information systems. Sloan Manag. Rev. 33, 39--47.

[11]

Delone, W. H. and Mclean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success—A ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19, 9--30.

Digital Library

[12]

Dreiling, A. 2007. Myths, Narratives and the Dilemma of Managerial Support—Organizational learning as an Alternative. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

[13]

Eckerson, W. W. 2002. The decision support sweet spot. J. Data Warehous. 7, 4--9.

[14]

Eckerson, W. W. 2006. Performance Dashboards—Measuring, Monitoring and Managing your Business. John Wiley & Sons.

[15]

Eckerson, W. W. 2010. Transforming Finance—How CFOs Use Business Intelligence to Turn Finance from Record Keepers to Strategic Advisors. TDWI Press.

[16]

Eckerson, W. W. 2011. Visual Reporting and Analysis. TDWI Press.

[17]

Elam, J. J. and Leidner, D. G. 1995. EIS adoption, use, impact: The executive perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 14, 89--103.

Digital Library

[18]

Frolick, M. N. and Robichaux, B. P. 1995. EIS information requirements determination: Using a group support system to enhance the strategic business objectives method. Decis. Support Syst. 14, 157--170.

Digital Library

[19]

Gebauer, J., Shaw, M. J., and Gribbins, M. L. 2010. Task-Technology fit for mobile information systems. J. Inf. Tech. 25, 259--272.

[20]

Gregor, S. 2006. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. 30, 611--642.

Digital Library

[21]

Haley, B. J. and Watson, H. J. 1996. Using lotus notes in EISs. Inf. Syst. Manag. 13, 38--43.

[22]

Hartono, E., Santhanam, R., and Holsapple, C. W. 2007. Factors that contribute to management support system success: An analysis of field studies. Decis. Support Syst. 43, 256--268.

Digital Library

[23]

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28, 75--105.

Digital Library

[24]

Hoogervorst, J. A. P. 2009. Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Berlin.

[25]

Houdeshel, G. and Watson, H. J. 1987. The management information and decision support (MIDS) system at Lockheed-Georgia. MIS Quart. 11, 127--140.

Digital Library

[26]

IEEE. 1990. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE Computer Society.

[27]

Jiang, J. J., Muhanna, W. A., and Klein, G. 2000. User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types. Inf. Manag. 37, 25--36.

Digital Library

[28]

Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. 1997. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

[29]

Kelly, J. N. 1988. Executive information systems. Patricia Seybold's Office Comput. Rep. 11, 3.

[30]

Koh, C. E. and Watson, H. J. 1998. Data management in executive information systems, Inf. Manag. 33, 301--312.

Digital Library

[31]

Koutsoukis, N.-S., Mitra, G., and Lucas, C. 1999. Adapting on-line analytical processing for decision modelling: The interaction of information and decision technologies, Decis. Support Syst. 26, 1--30.

Digital Library

[32]

Li, N., Lu, J., and Zhang, G. 2009. Business intelligence. In Li, N., Lu, J., and Zhang, G. Cognition-Driven Decision Support for Business Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, 19--29.

[33]

March, S. T. and Smith, G. F. 1995. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251--266.

Digital Library

[34]

Matek, W., Muhs, D., and Wittel, H. 1987. Maschinenelemente - Normung -- Berechnung - Gestaltung. Vieweg, Braunschweig.

[35]

Mayer, J. H. and Krönke, B. 2010. Business/IT alignment: The executive perspective. In Proceedings of Business Information Systems Workshops. Abramowicz, W./Tolksdorf, R./Wecel, Krzystof Eds. 131--143.

[36]

Mayer, J. H. and Marx, F. 2010. Systematic development of business-driven requirements -- Using next-generation EIS design as an example. In Proceedings of 5th Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST). Winter, R., Zhao, J., Aier, S. eds. 506--521.

Digital Library

[37]

Mintzberg, H. 1972. The myths of MIS. Calif. Manag. Rev. 15, 92--97.

[38]

Nord, J. H. and Nord, G. D. 1995. Executive information systems: A study and comparative analysis. Inf. Manag. 29, 95--106.

Digital Library

[39]

Paller, A. and Laska, R. 1990. The EIS Book: Information Systems for Top Managers: Building Information Systems for Top Managers. Wiley & Sons, Irwin Professional Publishing.

Digital Library

[40]

Palvia, P., Kumar, A., Kumar, N., and Hendon, R. 1996. Information requirements of a global EIS: An exploratory macro assessment, Decis. Support Syst. 16, 169--179.

Digital Library

[41]

Papageorgiou, E. and De Bryn, H. 2010. Creating strategic value through executive information systems: An exploratory study. The Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 13, 57--76.

[42]

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45--77.

Digital Library

[43]

Poon, P. and Wagner, C. 2001. Critical success factors revisited: Success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives. Decis. Support Syst. 30, 393--418.

Digital Library

[44]

Popper, K. R. 1982. Logik der Forschung. Mohr, Tübingen.

[45]

Rainer, R. K. and Watson, H. J. 1995. The keys to executive information system success. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12, 83--98.

[46]

Rockart, J. F. (1979). Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67, 34--37.

[47]

Rockart, J. F. 1982. The changing role of the information systems executive - a critical success factors perspective. Sloan Manag. Rev. 24, 3--13.

[48]

Rockart, J. F. and Treacy, M. E. 1989. The CEO goes on-line. In: End-User Computing: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, R.R. Nelson (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 55--64.

Digital Library

[49]

Salmeron, J. L. 2002. EIS data: Findings from an evolutionary study. J. Syst. Softw. 64, 111--114.

Digital Library

[50]

Samuelson, P. A. 1983. Foundations of Economic Analysis Enlarged Ed. Harvard University Press.

[51]

Scott Morton, M. S. 1967. Computer-Driven visual display devices - their impact on the management decision-making process. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard Business School.

[52]

Seeley, M. and Targett, D. 1999. Patterns of senior executives' personal use of computers. Inf. Manag. 35, 315--330.

Digital Library

[53]

Shank, M. E., Boynton, A. C., and Zmud, R. W. 1985. Critical success factor analysis as a methodology for MIS planning. MIS Quart. 9, 121--129.

Digital Library

[54]

Singh, S. K., Watson, H. J., and Watson, R. T. 2002. EIS support for the strategic management process. Decis. Support Syst. 33, 71--85.

[55]

Stein, A. 1995. Re-engineering the executive: The 4th generation of EIS. Inf. Manag. 29, 55--62.

Digital Library

[56]

Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., and Riempp, G. 2009. The state of research on information systems success - A review of existing multidimensional approaches. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1, 315--325.

[57]

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27, 425--478.

[58]

Vodanovich, S., Sundaram, D., and Myers, M. 2010. Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 711--723.

Digital Library

[59]

Volonino, L. and Watson, H. J. 1991. The strategic business objects method for guiding executive information systems development. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 7, 27--40.

Digital Library

[60]

Walia, G. and Carver, J. 2009. A systematic literature review to identify a classify software requirement errors. Inf. Softw. Tech. 51, 1087--1109.

Digital Library

[61]

Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., and El Sawy, O. A. 1992. Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36--59.

Digital Library

[62]

Walters, B. A., Jiang, J. J., and Klein, G. 2003. Strategic information and strategic decision making: The EIS/CEO interface in smaller manufacturing companies. Inf. Manag. 40, 487--495.

Digital Library

[63]

Walstrom, K. A. and Wilson, R. L. 1997. An examination of information systems (EIS) users. Inf. Manag. 32, 75--83.

Digital Library

[64]

Warmouth, D. T. and Yen, D. 1992. A detailed analysis of executive information systems. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 12, 192--208.

Digital Library

[65]

Watson, H. J. 2011. What happened to executive information systems&quest; Bus. Intell. J. 16, 4--6.

[66]

Watson, H. J. and Frolick, M. N. 1993. Determining information requirements for an EIS. MIS Quart. 17, 255--269.

Digital Library

[67]

Watson, H. J., Rainer Jr, R. K., and Koh, C. E. 1991. Executive information systems: A framework for development and a survey of current practices. MIS Quart. 15, 13--30.

Digital Library

[68]

Watson, H. J. and Satzinger, J. 1994. Guidelines for designing EIS interfaces: Meeting executives' information needs. Inf. Syst. Manag. 46--52.

[69]

Wixom, B. H. and Todd, P. A. 2005. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16, 85--102.

Digital Library

[70]

Wixom, B. H. and Watson, H. J. 2010. The BI-based organization. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res. 1, 13--28.

Cited By

Kolisch RFliedner T(2021)A Decision Support System for Planning Portfolios of Supply Chain Improvement Projects in the Semiconductor IndustryEvolutionary and Memetic Computing for Project Portfolio Selection and Scheduling10.1007/978-3-030-88315-7_8(193-212)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88315-7_8
Sarikaya ACorrell MBartram LTory MFisher D(2019)What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2018.286490325:1(682-692)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864903
Riehle DRadas J(2019)Which Business Information Do Decision-Makers Need at Work? - Towards a Classification Framework2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)10.1109/CBI.2019.00042(312-319)Online publication date: Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00042
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Six principles for redesigning executive information systems—findings of a survey and evaluation of a prototype
1. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications

Recommendations

Executive information systems for the chief information officer

While many organizations may be attracted by the potential benefits of an executive information system (EIS), the development and implementation costs can be very difficult to estimate. Such uncertainty leads naturally to consideration of prototyping. ...
The executive's guide to information technology, second edition
Executive or functional manager?: The nature of the CIO's job

The role of the chief information officer (CIO)_ continues to be the subject of much discussion and speculation. Is this just a new name for the MIS manager, or is there truly a new and significantly different function? How has the role of the ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems Volume 2, Issue 4

December 2011

141 pages

ISSN:2158-656X

EISSN:2158-6578

DOI:10.1145/2070710

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2012 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 January 2012

Accepted: 01 November 2011

Revised: 01 August 2011

Received: 01 December 2010

Published in TMIS Volume 2, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

25
Total Citations
View Citations
1,206
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)25
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kolisch RFliedner T(2021)A Decision Support System for Planning Portfolios of Supply Chain Improvement Projects in the Semiconductor IndustryEvolutionary and Memetic Computing for Project Portfolio Selection and Scheduling10.1007/978-3-030-88315-7_8(193-212)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88315-7_8
Sarikaya ACorrell MBartram LTory MFisher D(2019)What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2018.286490325:1(682-692)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864903
Riehle DRadas J(2019)Which Business Information Do Decision-Makers Need at Work? - Towards a Classification Framework2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)10.1109/CBI.2019.00042(312-319)Online publication date: Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00042
Pape T(2016)Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resourcesEuropean Journal of Operational Research10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.052252:2(687-698)Online publication date: Jul-2016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.052
King JSimon C(2015)Complications with Complexity in RequirementsACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/26293755:3(1-12)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2629375
Yu CChen HKlein GJiang R(2015)The roots of executive information system development risksInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2015.08.00168:C(34-44)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.08.001
Mayer JRöder AHartwig JQuick R(2014)A Self-Service MSS Design from a New-Generation Manager PerspectiveAdvancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_11(164-179)Online publication date: 2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_11
Wu JHolsapple C(2013)Does Knowledge Management Matter? The Empirical Evidence from Market-Based ValuationACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/25007504:2(1-23)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2500750
Lee YAvizienis RBishara AXia RLockhart DBatten CAsanović K(2013)Exploring the Tradeoffs between Programmability and Efficiency in Data-Parallel AcceleratorsACM Transactions on Computer Systems10.1145/249146431:3(1-38)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2491464
Ullah ALai R(2013)A Systematic Review of Business and Information Technology AlignmentACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/2445560.24455644:1(1-30)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2445560.2445564
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents