Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2103354.2103364acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where should I send my post?: the concept of discourse quality in online forums and its dependency on membership size

Published: 29 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Today's Web users are faced with a large number of available online communities for every domain. While there are rules-of-thumb for the choice of a specific community, the validity of these heuristics has hardly been tested empirically. Furthermore, there is a lack of well-founded measures that allow for a systematic comparison of different online forum communities. In this contribution, we propose the concept of discourse quality as a means to this end. This measure is conceptualized from a user perspective and combines quantitative as well as qualitative parts, including a codebook for content analysis. To show the applicability and the usefulness of this measure, we systematically compare 34 online forums with varying degrees of membership size. We are able to show that the forums with the most members online consistently show high discourse quality. Finally, we discuss the potential of benchmark measures for future online community research.

References

[1]
Aschoff, F. R., Prestipino, M., and Schwabe, G. Cooperation technology and timeliness of information: Comparing travel books, wikis and online communities, in Proc. 15th European Conference on Information Systems (St. Gallen Switzerland, June 2007).
[2]
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1995.
[3]
Bullen, M. A case study of participation and critical thinking in a university level course delivered by computer conferencing, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of British Columbia, 1997. Available at: http://bullenmark.wordpress.com/publications-and-presentations/
[4]
Burnett, G., and Buerkle, H. Information exchange in virtual communities: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 9, 2 (2004) Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue2/burnett.html
[5]
Butler, B. Membership size, communication activity and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research 12, 4 (2001), 346--362.
[6]
De Cindio, F., and Peraboni, C. Design Issues for Building Deliberative Digital Habitats, in Proc. 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation (Leeds, UK, 30 June-2 July, 2010). 41--52.
[7]
Fiore, A. T., Lee Tiernan, S., and Smith, M. A. Observed behavior and perceived value of authors in usenet newsgroups: Bridging the gap, in Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI. (Minneapolis USA, 20-25 April, 2002), ACM Press.
[8]
Graham, T. What's wife swap have to do with it? Talking politics online, in Proc. 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation (Leeds, UK, 30 June-2 July, 2010). 101--116.
[9]
Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., and Anderson, T. Analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17 (1997), 395--429.
[10]
Hagel, J. III, and Armstrong, A. J. Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities. Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA, 1997.
[11]
Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., and Angeli, C. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science 28, 2 (2000), 115--152.
[12]
Henri, F. Computer conferencing and content analysis, in: A. R. Kaye (ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden Papers, Springer-Verlag, Berlin GE, 1992, 117--136.
[13]
Howard T. W., Gleave E., Fisher, D., and Smith, M. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. The Journal of Social Structures 8, 2 (2007).
[14]
Jones Q., Rafaeli S., and Ravid G. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research 15, 2 (Summer 2004), 194--210.
[15]
Lourkis, E., and Wimmer, M. A. Analysing different models of structured electronic consultation on legislation under formation, in Proc. 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation (Leeds, UK, 30 June-2 July, 2010). 14--26.
[16]
Marwell, G., and Oliver, P. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1993.
[17]
Preece, J. Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex UK, 2000.
[18]
Preece, J., and Ghozati, K. Experiencing empathy online. In R. E. Rice and J. E. Katz (eds.) The Internet and Health Communication. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, 1998, 237--260.
[19]
Prestipino, M., and Schwabe, G. Tourismus-Communities als Informationsysteme, Proc. Wirtschaftsinformatik, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2005, 1083--1102.
[20]
Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Addison Wesley Harper Perennial Paperback, Reading MA, 1993.
[21]
Ridings, C., and Gefen, D. Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 10, 1 (November 2004).
[22]
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W. Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. JALN 5,2 (Fall 2001), 1--17.
[23]
Schwabe, G., and Prestipino, M. How tourism communities can change travel information quality, in Proc. 13 th European Conference on Information Systems (Regensburg, June 2005), AIS Electronic Library.
[24]
Zhu, E. Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course, in Proc. 18 th National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Indianapolis IN, 1996).

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Finding Useful Solutions in Online Knowledge Communities: A Theory-Driven Design and Multilevel AnalysisInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2019.0911Online publication date: 7-May-2020
  • (2019)User Adoption of Physician's Replies in an Online Health Community: An Empirical StudyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24319Online publication date: 14-Nov-2019
  • (2017)Scaffolded Help for LearningProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies10.1145/3083671.3083694(149-158)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Where should I send my post?: the concept of discourse quality in online forums and its dependency on membership size

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        C&T '11: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
        June 2011
        193 pages
        ISBN:9781450308243
        DOI:10.1145/2103354
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        • Queensland University of Technology

        In-Cooperation

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 29 June 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. content analysis
        2. discourse quality
        3. member activity
        4. online communities
        5. online forums

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        C&T '11
        Sponsor:
        C&T '11: Communities and Technologies
        June 29 - July 2, 2011
        Brisbane, Australia

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2020)Finding Useful Solutions in Online Knowledge Communities: A Theory-Driven Design and Multilevel AnalysisInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2019.0911Online publication date: 7-May-2020
        • (2019)User Adoption of Physician's Replies in an Online Health Community: An Empirical StudyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24319Online publication date: 14-Nov-2019
        • (2017)Scaffolded Help for LearningProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies10.1145/3083671.3083694(149-158)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2017
        • (2015)Knowledge generation in online forums: a case study in the German educational domainAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-011267:1(2-26)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2015

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media