Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2110363.2110419acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilizing assigned treatments as labels for supervised machine learning in clinical decision support

Published: 28 January 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tools are typically designed to assist physicians in clinical decision making at Point Of Care (POC). Existing CDS tools commonly rely on relatively simple rules, deduced from relevant clinical guidelines. However, the increasing pace by which Health Care Organizations (HCOs) adopt Electronic Health Record technologies suggest great potential for CDS tools that directly mine the massive clinical data collected at the HCO. A natural goal for such tools is to exploit Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in order to predict patient's outcome. However, the technical challenges involved in constructing such a system in practice are quite involved, where in particular treatments outcome are often not available as part of the HCO's data.
Here, we propose a different strategy in which we use the assigned treatments as the labels in the learning process of the supervised ML algorithms. We present two different use-cases in which our approach could be used. First, in order to highlight the clinical features most associated with the assigned treatments; and second, in order to predict the customary treatment for a patient at POC in a statistically data-driven manner. Altogether, our approach represents a novel strategy that is complementary to the classical paradigm of rule-based clinical guidelines adherence. Experimental results over hypertension clinical data demonstrate the validity of our approach.

References

[1]
Ec fp7 hypergenes http://www.hypergenes.eu/, June 2011.
[2]
D. Anastassiou. Computational analysis of the synergy among multiple interacting genes. Molecular Systems Biology, 3(83), Feb 2007.
[3]
A. V. Chobanian, G. L. Bakris, H. R. Black, W. C. Cushman, L. A. Green, J. L. Izzo, D. W. Jones, B. J. Materson, S. Oparil, J. T. Wright, and E. J. Roccella. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension, 42(6):1206--1252, Dec. 2003.
[4]
T. Cover and J. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory (2nd Edition). Wiley, New York, 2006.
[5]
P. Domingos and M. J. Pazzani. Beyond independence: Conditions for the optimality of the simple bayesian classiffer. In Proceedings of the 13th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, pages 105--112. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.
[6]
R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification (2nd Edition). Wiley, New York, 2001.
[7]
S. Ebadollahi, J. Sun, D. Gotz, J. Hu, D. Sow, and C. Neti. Predicting patient's trajectory of physiological data using temporal trends in similar patients: A system for near-term prognostics. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annu Symp, pages 192--196, November 2010.
[8]
U. Fayyad and K. Irani. Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning. In IJCAI, September 1993.
[9]
D. Ferrucci, E. Brown, J. Chu-Carroll, J. Fan, D. Gondek, A. A. Kalyanpur, A. Lally, J. W. Murdock, E. Nyberg, J. Prager, N. Schlaefer, and C. Welty. Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project. AI Magazine, 31(3), 2010.
[10]
A. X. Garg, N. K. J. Adhikari, H. McDonald, M. P. Rosas-Arellano, P. J. Devereaux, J. Beyene, J. Sam, and R. B. Haynes. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA, 293(10):1223--1238, 2005.
[11]
P. Jain and A. Kapoor. Active learning for large multi-class problems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.
[12]
M. W. M. Jaspers, M. Smeulers, H. Vermeulen, and L. W. Peute. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. JAMIA, 18:327--334, March 2011.
[13]
A. J. Joshi, F. Porikli, and N. Papanikolopoulos. Multi-class active learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2372--2379, 2009.
[14]
K. Kawamoto, C. A. Houlihan, E. A. Balas, and D. F. Lobach. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. BMJ, 330:765, March 2005.
[15]
O. H. Klungel, A. de Boer, A. H. Paes, J. C. Seidell, and A. Bakker. Sex differences in the pharmacological treatment of hypertension: a review of population-based studies. J Hypertens, 15(6):591--600, 1997.
[16]
G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagarde, G. Germanof, G. Grassi, A. Heagertyh, S. Kjeldsen, S. Laurenti, and et al. 2007 esh-esc practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: Esh-esc task force on the management of arterial hypertension. Journal of Hypertension, 25(9):1751--1762, 2007.
[17]
D. A. Moralesa, E. Bengoetxeab, P. L. agaa, M. Garciíac, Y. F. M. Fresnadaa, and M. Merinod. Bayesian classification for the selection of in vitro human embryos using morphological and clinical data. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 90(2):104--116, May 2008.
[18]
R. Rinott, B. Carmeli, C. Kent, D. Landau, Y. Maman, Y. Rubin, and N. Slonim. Prognostic data-driven clinical decision support - formulation and implications. In Proceedings of the XXIII International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (MIE), August 2011.
[19]
E. Schneidman, S. Still, I. Michael J. Berry, and W. Bialek. Network information and connected correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91:238701, Dec 2003.
[20]
N. Slonim, G. S. Atwal, G. Tkacik, and W. Bialek. Information-based clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) U S A, 102(51):18297--302, Dec 2005.
[21]
N. Slonim, E. Yom-Tov, and K. Crammer. Active online classification via information maximization. In IJCAI, 2011.
[22]
O. G. Troyanskaya, M. Cantor, G. Sherlock, P. O. Brown, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, D. Botstein, and R. B. Altman. Missing value estimation methods for dna microarrays. Bioinformatics/computer Applications in The Biosciences, 17:520--525, 2001.
[23]
C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, 2 edition, 1979.
[24]
A. Wright, D. F. Sittig, J. S. Ash, J. Feblowitz, S. Meltzer, C. McMullen, K. Guappone, J. Carpenter, J. Richardson, L. Simonaitis, R. S. Evans, W. P. Nichol, and B. Middleton. Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems. JAMIA, 18:232--242, March 2011.
[25]
M. Zazzi, R. Kaiser, A. Sonnerborg, D. Struck, A. Altmann, M. Prosperi, M. Rosen-Zvi, A. Petroczi, Y. Peres, E. Schulter, C. Boucher, F. Brun-Vezinet, P. Harrigan, L. Morris, M. Obermeier, C.-F. Perno, P. Phanuphak, D. Pillay, R. Shafer, A.-M. Vandamme, K. van Laethem, A. Wensing, T. Lengauer, and F. Incardona. Prediction of response to antiretroviral therapy by human experts and by the euresist data-driven expert system (the eve study). HIV Medicine, 12:211--218, 2011.
[26]
F. Zheng and G. I. Webb. A comparative study of semi-naive bayes methods in classiffication learning. In Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Data Mining Workshop (AusDM05), pages 141--156, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Parameter-Invariant Monitor Design for Cyber–Physical SystemsProceedings of the IEEE10.1109/JPROC.2017.2723847106:1(71-92)Online publication date: Jan-2018
  • (2017)ACESO: Analysis of Cervical Cancer: An Evidence-Based Treatments Optimization2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)10.1109/CBMS.2017.166(332-336)Online publication date: Jun-2017

Index Terms

  1. Utilizing assigned treatments as labels for supervised machine learning in clinical decision support

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IHI '12: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium
    January 2012
    914 pages
    ISBN:9781450307819
    DOI:10.1145/2110363
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 January 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. clinical decision support
    2. feature selection
    3. hypertension
    4. machine learning
    5. naive bayes

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IHI '12
    Sponsor:
    IHI '12: ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
    January 28 - 30, 2012
    Florida, Miami, USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)Parameter-Invariant Monitor Design for Cyber–Physical SystemsProceedings of the IEEE10.1109/JPROC.2017.2723847106:1(71-92)Online publication date: Jan-2018
    • (2017)ACESO: Analysis of Cervical Cancer: An Evidence-Based Treatments Optimization2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)10.1109/CBMS.2017.166(332-336)Online publication date: Jun-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media