Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2124295.2124316acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ETF: extended tensor factorization model for personalizing prediction of review helpfulness

Published: 08 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Online reviews are valuable sources of information for a variety of decision-making processes such as purchasing products. As the number of online reviews is growing rapidly, it becomes increasingly difficult for users to identify those that are helpful. This has motivated research into the problem of identifying high quality and helpful reviews automatically. The current methods assume that the helpfulness of a review is independent from the readers of that review. However, we argue that the quality of a review may not be the same for different users. For example, a professional and an amateur photographer may rate the helpfulness of a review very differently. In this paper, we introduce the problem of predicting a personalized review quality for recommendation of helpful reviews. To address this problem, we propose a series of increasingly sophisticated probabilistic graphical models, based on Matrix Factorization and Tensor Factorization. We evaluate the proposed models using a database of 1.5 million reviews and more than 13 million quality ratings obtained from Epinions.com. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed latent factor models outperform the state-of-the art approaches using textual and social features. Finally, our experiments confirm that the helpfulness of a review is indeed not the same for all users and that there are some latent factors that affect a user's evaluation of the review quality.

References

[1]
C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, G. Kossinets, J. Kleinberg, and L. Lee. How opinions are received by online communities: a case study on amazon.com helpfulness votes. In WWW '09.
[2]
A. Ghose and P. G. Ipeirotis. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 99, 2010.
[3]
D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun. ACM, 35, 1992.
[4]
S. Huang, D. Shen, W. Feng, C. Baudin, and Y. Zhang. Improving product review search experiences on general search engines. In ICEC '09.
[5]
S. Huang, D. Shen, W. Feng, Y. Zhang, and C. Baudin. Discovering clues for review quality from author's behaviors on e-commerce sites. In ICEC '09.
[6]
M. Jamali and M. Ester. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In ACM RecSys '10.
[7]
N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion spam and analysis. In WSDM '08.
[8]
N. Jindal and B. Liu. Review spam detection. In WWW '07.
[9]
A. Karatzoglou, X. Amatriain, L. Baltrunas, and N. Oliver. Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In ACM RecSys '10.
[10]
S.-M. Kim, P. Pantel, T. Chklovski, and M. Pennacchiotti. Automatically assessing review helpfulness. In EMNLP '06.
[11]
Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD '09.
[12]
Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer Journal, 42, 2009.
[13]
L. D. Lathauwer, B. D. Moor, and J. Vandewalle. A multilinear singular value decomposition. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 21(4), 2000.
[14]
F. Li, Y. Tang, M. Huang, and X. Zhu. Answering opinion questions with random walks on graphs. In ACL-IJCNLP '09.
[15]
E.-P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. W. Lauw. Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In CIKM '10.
[16]
J. Liu, Y. Cao, C.-Y. Lin, Y. Huang, and M. Zhou. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. In EMNLP-CoNLL '07.
[17]
Y. Lu, P. Tsaparas, A. Ntoulas, and L. Polanyi. Exploiting social context for review quality prediction. In WWW '10.
[18]
P. Massa and P. Avesani. Controversial users demand local trust metrics: an experimental study on epinions.com community. In AAAI '05.
[19]
Q. Miao, Q. Li, and R. Dai. A unified framework for opinion retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01, 2008.
[20]
S. Moghaddam and M. Ester. ILDA: interdependent lda model for learning latent aspects and their ratings from online product reviews. In SIGIR '11.
[21]
S. Moghaddam and M. Ester. Opinion digger: an unsupervised opinion miner from unstructured product reviews. In CIKM '10.
[22]
S. Moghaddam, M. Jamali, and M. Ester. Review recommendation: personalized prediction of the quality of online reviews. In CIKM '11.
[23]
M. P. O'Mahony and B. Smyth. Learning to recommend helpful hotel reviews. In ACM RecSys '09.
[24]
S. Rendle, L. Balby Marinho, A. Nanopoulos, and S.-T. Lars. Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation. In KDD '09.
[25]
R. Salakhutdinov and A. Mnih. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In NIPS '07.
[26]
S. Siersdorfer, S. Chelaru, W. Nejdl, and J. San Pedro. How useful are your comments?: analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. In WWW '10.
[27]
M. A. Suryanto, E. P. Lim, A. Sun, and R. H. L. Chiang. Quality-aware collaborative question answering: methods and evaluation. In WSDM '09.
[28]
Y.-D. Tseng and C. C. Chen. Using an information quality framework to evaluate the quality of product reviews. In AIRS '09.
[29]
X. Yu, Y. Liu, X. Huang, and A. An. A quality-aware model for sales prediction using reviews. In WWW '10.
[30]
Z. Zhang and B. Varadarajan. Utility scoring of product reviews. In CIKM '06.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GPUTucker: Large-Scale GPU-Based Tucker Decomposition Using Tensor PartitioningExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121445237(121445)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2023)Predicting Personalized Textual Reviews via Collaborative Filtering using Document EmbeddingCompanion Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581754.3584147(116-118)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Double Attention Convolutional Neural Network for Sequential RecommendationACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/355535016:4(1-23)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSDM '12: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
February 2012
792 pages
ISBN:9781450307475
DOI:10.1145/2124295
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 February 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. matrix factorization
  2. personalized review quality prediction
  3. review recommendation
  4. tensor factorization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)GPUTucker: Large-Scale GPU-Based Tucker Decomposition Using Tensor PartitioningExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121445237(121445)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2023)Predicting Personalized Textual Reviews via Collaborative Filtering using Document EmbeddingCompanion Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581754.3584147(116-118)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Double Attention Convolutional Neural Network for Sequential RecommendationACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/355535016:4(1-23)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Predicting Product Review Helpfulness – A Hybrid MethodIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2020.304109515:4(2213-2225)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Personalized Review Recommendation without User Interactive Data2022 IEEE 24th Int Conf on High Performance Computing & Communications; 8th Int Conf on Data Science & Systems; 20th Int Conf on Smart City; 8th Int Conf on Dependability in Sensor, Cloud & Big Data Systems & Application (HPCC/DSS/SmartCity/DependSys)10.1109/HPCC-DSS-SmartCity-DependSys57074.2022.00307(2062-2070)Online publication date: Dec-2022
  • (2022)Meta-Learning based Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network for Top-N Review Recommendation2022 5th International Conference on Advanced Electronic Materials, Computers and Software Engineering (AEMCSE)10.1109/AEMCSE55572.2022.00091(427-432)Online publication date: Apr-2022
  • (2022)Multi-Task Learning with Personalized Transformer for Review RecommendationWeb Information Systems Engineering – WISE 202110.1007/978-3-030-91560-5_12(162-176)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Multi-Attribute Online Decision-Making Driven by Opinion MiningMathematics10.3390/math90808339:8(833)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2021
  • (2021)Personalized Ranking of Online Reviews Based on Consumer Preferences in Product FeaturesInternational Journal of Electronic Commerce10.1080/10864415.2021.184685225:1(29-50)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Recommender System Based on Temporal Models: A Systematic ReviewApplied Sciences10.3390/app1007220410:7(2204)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media