Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132224acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Metadatapedia: a proposal for aggregating metadata on data archiving

Published: 07 February 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The open access movement has highlighted the barriers that exist for users to gain access to significant portions of the research literature. The open data approach seeks to extend the principles of open access to the data and code that supports the published scholarly record. Current metadata is inadequate to allow information researchers to evaluate claims made about data archiving practices. Assessing current archiving practice and understanding the impact of archiving policies requires improved metadata. We propose that information researchers create an infrastructure for the collection of metadata about data use in the research literature, and that infrastructure should itself be open. The availability of metadata on data use would enable the calculation of archiving indices, just as citation data enables the calculation of the h-index.

    References

    [1]
    Anderson, R. G., W. H. Greene, B. D. McCullough and Vinod, H. D. 2008. The Role of Data/Code Archives in the Future of Economic Research. Journal of Economic Methodology. 15, 1, 99--119.
    [2]
    Arzberger, P., Schroeder, P., Beaulieu, A., Bowker, G., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., Moorman, D., Uhlir, P. and Wouters, P. 2004. Promoting access to public research data for scientific, economic, and social development, Data Science Journal, 3, 135--152.
    [3]
    Borgman, C. L. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age: information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [4]
    Costello, M. J. 2009. Motivating online publication of data, BioScience, 59, 5, 418--427.
    [5]
    CiteULike. http://www.citeulike.org/
    [6]
    DBLP Computer Science Bibliography. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/
    [7]
    Delserone, L. M. 2008. At the watershed: preparing for research data management and stewardship at the University of Minnesota Libraries. Library Trends 57, 2, 202--210.
    [8]
    Eickhoff, C. and de Vries, A. 2011. How Crowdsourcable is Your Task? Proceedings of the Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Search and Data Mining (CSDM) at the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 11--14.
    [9]
    Fang, F. C. and Casadevall, A. 2011. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index, Infection and Immunity, 79, 10, 855--3859.
    [10]
    Freese, J. 2007. Replication Standards for Quantitative Social Science: Why Not Sociology? Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 2, 153--172.
    [11]
    Fry, J., Schroeder, R. and den Besten, M. 2008. Open science in e-science: contingency or policy? Journal of Documentation, 65, 1, 6--32.
    [12]
    getCITED. http://www.getcited.org/
    [13]
    JISC. Open Bibliographic Data Guide. http://obd.jisc.ac.uk/
    [14]
    JULIET http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/index.php
    [15]
    Krichel, T. and Zimmermann, C. 2009. The Economics of Open Bibliographic Data Provision. Economic Analysis and Policy 39, 1, 143--152.
    [16]
    Laine C., Goodman S. N., Griswold M. E. and Sox, H. C. 2007. Reproducible research: moving toward research the public can really trust. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146, 6, 450--453.
    [17]
    McCullough, B. D. and McKitrick, R. 2009. Check the Numbers: The Case for Due Diligence in Policy Formation, Studies in Risk & Regulation. Fraser Institute. February 2009.
    [18]
    McIntyre, S. 2006. Comment at Climate Audit, 24 July 2006. http://climateaudit.org/2006/07/06/new-thompson-article-at-pnas/#comment-55284
    [19]
    Mervis, J. 2010. NSF to Ask Every Grant Applicant for Data Management Plan, Science Insider, 5 May. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/05/nsf-to-ask-every-grant-applicant.html
    [20]
    Murray-Rust, P. 2008. Open data in science. Serials Review 34, 1, 52--64.
    [21]
    Piwowar, H. A. 2011. Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data. PLoS ONE 6, 7, e18657.
    [22]
    Savage C. J. and Vickers A. J. 2009. Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals. PLoS ONE 4, 9, e7078.
    [23]
    Science Foundation Ireland, 2010. Policy Relating to the Open Access Availability of Published Research. http://www.sfi.ie/assets/files/downloads/Funding/grant_policies/open%20access%20dec%2010.pdf
    [24]
    Science Staff 2011. Introduction to Special Issue Challenges and Opportunities, Science, 331, 6018, 692--693.
    [25]
    SHERPA/RoMEO: Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
    [26]
    Stodden, V. 2010. Open science: policy implications for the evolving phenomenon of user-led scientific innovation. Journal of Science Communication, 9, 1. http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/09/01/Jcom0901(2010)A05
    [27]
    Tenopir C., Allard S., Douglass K., Aydinoglu A. U., Wu L., Read, E., Manoff, M. and Frame, M. 2011. Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6, 6, e21101.
    [28]
    Thomson Reuters, History of Scientific Indexing. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/history_of_citation_indexing/
    [29]
    Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J. and Molenaar, D. 2006. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61, 726--728.
    [30]
    Willinsky, J., 2006. The Access Principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [31]
    Xia, J. 2007. Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: across-disciplines, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33, 6, 647--654.
    [32]
    Zaïane, O. R., Chen, J., and Goebel, R. 2007. DBconnect: mining research community on DBLP data. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07). ACM, New York, NY, 74--81.

    Cited By

    View all

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
    February 2012
    667 pages
    ISBN:9781450307826
    DOI:10.1145/2132176
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 February 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. data archiving
    2. data curation
    3. metadata
    4. open data

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    iConference '12
    iConference '12: iConference 2012
    February 7 - 10, 2012
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jul 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Comparative Analysis of Metadata Models on e-Government Open Data PlatformsIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing10.1109/TETC.2018.28155919:1(119-130)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2017)Metrics for opennessJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2374168:4(1048-1060)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017
    • (2016)Big Data Comes to SchoolAERA Open10.1177/23328584166419072:2(233285841664190)Online publication date: Apr-2016
    • (2013)Exploiting Classical Bibliometrics of CSCW: Classification, Evaluation, Limitations, and the Odds of Semantic AnalyticsHuman Factors in Computing and Informatics10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_9(137-156)Online publication date: 2013

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media