Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132229acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Steps toward a socio-technical categorization scheme for communication and information standards

Published: 07 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Socio-technical systems continue to grow larger and more complex, comprising increasingly significant portions of contemporary society. Yet systematic understanding of interrelationships between social and technological elements remains elusive, even as computers and information systems proliferate. In this paper, we draw on ethnomethodology to distinguish several different kinds of processes through which communication and information are constituted. We discuss the distinctive properties of each in an effort to develop systematic understanding of basic elements of socio-technical systems. In particular, we offer a basic categorization of communication and information standards, noting the constitutive importance of their accompanying social practices. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

References

[1]
Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press.
[2]
Bowker, G. C. and S. L. Star (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
[3]
Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid (1995). "The social life of documents." Release 1.0: 1--18.
[4]
Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid (2002). The Social Life of Information, Harvard Business Press.
[5]
Brunsson, N. and B. Jacobsson (2000). A World of Standards. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
[6]
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?. J. Law. London, Routledge: 196--223.
[7]
Casey, E. S. (1987). Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University Press.
[8]
Clayman, S. E. (1988). "Displaying neutrality in television news interviews." Social Problems 35: 474--492.
[9]
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains, Princeton University Press.
[10]
David, P. A. (2006). Towards a cyberinfrastructure for enhanced scientific collaboration: Providing its 'soft' foundations may be the hardest part. Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy. D. Foray and B. Kahin. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 431--454.
[11]
Durkheim, É. ({1893}1933 ). The Division of Labor in Society. Chicago, Free Press.
[12]
Durkheim, É. (1995/1912). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York, The Free Press.
[13]
Edwards, P. N., S. J. Jackson, G. C. Bowker and C. P. Knobel. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. University of Michigan. Retrieved September 2011, from http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/49353
[14]
Gamma, E., R. Helm, R. Johnson and J. Vlissides. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software Addison-Wesley Professional.
[15]
Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of and experiments with "trust" as a condition of concerted stable actions.
[16]
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
[17]
Garfinkel, H. ({1948}2005). Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. (A. W. Rawls, Ed.) Boulder, CO, Paradigm Publishers.
[18]
Garfinkel, H. ({1952}2008). Toward a Sociological Theory of Information. Boulder, CO, Paradigm.
[19]
Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, University of California Press.
[20]
Greatbatch, D. (1988). "A turn-taking system for British news interviews." Language in Society 17: 401--430.
[21]
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
[22]
Hester, S. and P. Eglin, Eds. (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Lanham, MD, International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.
[23]
Higgins, V. and W. Larner, Eds. (2010). Calculating the Social: Standards and the Reconfiguration of Governing. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
[24]
Housley, W. and R. Fitzgerald (2002). "The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis." Qualitative Research 2(1): 59--83.
[25]
Iacono, C. S. and P. A. Freeman (2006). Cyberinfrastructure in the making: Can we get there from here? Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy. D. Foray and B. Kahin. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 455--477.
[26]
Kim, Y. and K. Crowston (2011). Technology Adoption and Use Theory Review for Studying Scientists' Continued Use of Cyberinfrastructure. ASIST 2011 New Orleans, LA, USA. Retrieved September 2011, from http://crowston.syr.edu/system/files/ASIST2011-Cyber-infrastructureTheoryReview-FinalVersion.pdf
[27]
Latour, B. (1986). "Visualization & cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands." Knowledge & Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present.
[28]
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press.
[29]
Lee, C. P. (2007). "Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work" Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16(3): 307--339.
[30]
Library of Congress (US) (2011). "Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard - Official Web Site." Retrieved September 2011, from http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/
[31]
Luff, P., J. Hindmarsh, et al. (2000). Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design Sage.
[32]
Mann, D. E. and J. Brooks (2011). Differences between human oriented and machine oriented information standards: Implications for design of enterprise-scale information systems. 7th International Conference on Standardisation and Innovation in Information Technology, Berlin, Germany, September 2011, IEEE.
[33]
Miller, G. and R. Dingwall (1997). Context and Method in Qualitative Research, Sage.
[34]
Orlikowski, W. J. and S. V. Scott (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization. Academy of Management Annals. 1: 433--474.
[35]
Paoletti, G. (1998). The cult of images: Reading Chapter VII, Book II, of The Elementary Forms. On Durkheim's Elementary Forms of Religious Life. N. J. Allen, W. S. F. Pickering and W. W. Miller. New York, Routledge: 78--91.
[36]
Radley, A. (1990). Artefacts, memory and a sense of the past. Collective Remembering. D. Middleton and D. Edwards. Newbury Park, CA Sage: 46--59.
[37]
Rawls, A. W. (1987). "The interaction order sui generis: Goffman's contribution to social theory." Sociological Theory 5(2): 136--149.
[38]
Rawls, A. W. (2001). "Durkheim's treatment of practice: Concrete practice vs. representations as the foundations of reason." The Classical Journal of Sociology 1(1): 33--68.
[39]
Rawls, A. W. (2004). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Cambridge University Press.
[40]
Rawls, A. W. (2008). "Harold Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies." Organization Studies 29(5): 701--732.
[41]
Rawls, A. W. (2010). Social order as moral order. Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. S. Hitlin and S. Vaisey. New York Springer.
[42]
Rawls, A. W. (2011). "Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: Constitutive orders of sensemaking." Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 41(4): 396--418.
[43]
Rawls, A. W. and D. E. Mann (2010). "The thing is... What is our 'What'?": An ethnographic study of a design team's discussion of "Object" Clarity as a problem in designing an information system to facilitate system interoperability. MTR 10--2594. Bedford, MA, The MITRE Corporation.
[44]
Rolls, E. T. (2000). Memory systems in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology: 599--630.
[45]
Sacks, H. (1992, 1995). Lectures on Conversation, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
[46]
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. (1974). "A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation." Language. 50(4): 696--735.
[47]
Sawyer, S. (2008). "Data wealth, data poverty, science and cyberinfrastructure." Prometheus 26(4): 357--371.
[48]
Scott, S. V. and W. Venters (2007). Virtuality and virtualization the practice of e-science and e-social science: method, theory, and matter. Virtuality and Virtualization: Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Working Groups 8.2 on Information Systems and Organizations and 9.5 on Virtuality and Society. K. Crowston, S. Sieber and E. Wynn, Springer: 167--280.
[49]
Simon, H. (1957). Administrative Behavior New York, The Free Press.
[50]
Smith, F. J. (2006). "Data Science as an academic discipline." Data Science Journal 5(19): 163--164.
[51]
Star, S. L. and Griesemer (1989). Structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Pitman.
[52]
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
[53]
Suchman, L., R. Trigg, and J. Blomberg. (2002). "Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype." British Journal of Sociology 53(2): 163--179.
[54]
Walsh, J. and G. R. Ungson (1991). "Organizational memory." Academy of Management Review 16(1): 57--91.
[55]
Westra, B., M. Ramirez, S. W. Parham and J. M. Scaramozzino. (2010). "Science and Technology Resources on the Internet: Selected Internet Resources on Digital Research Data Curation." Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Retrieved September 2011, from http://www.istl.org/10-fall/internet2.html.
[56]
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2001). Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell Publishing.
[57]
Yates, J. (1993). Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
[58]
Zeiss, R. and P. Groenewegen (2009). "Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement." Organization 16(1): 81--100.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Locating the modern sacred: Moral/social facts and constitutive practicesJournal of Classical Sociology10.1177/1468795X1349713716:1(53-68)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2013

Index Terms

  1. Steps toward a socio-technical categorization scheme for communication and information standards

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
    February 2012
    667 pages
    ISBN:9781450307826
    DOI:10.1145/2132176
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 February 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. communication
    2. information standards
    3. social practices
    4. socio-technical systems

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    iConference '12
    iConference '12: iConference 2012
    February 7 - 10, 2012
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2013)Locating the modern sacred: Moral/social facts and constitutive practicesJournal of Classical Sociology10.1177/1468795X1349713716:1(53-68)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2013

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media