Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132289acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mapping scientific communities to scale-up ethnographies

Published: 07 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We will present the multistep process for generating bibliometric mappings of research fields and their community structure, a process that we have developed using a combination of network analysis and ethnographic field studies of scientific communities. We suggest that such maps are useful to support the strategic sampling of ethnographic field sites and the transparent scaling-up of ethnographic findings for the comparative study of collaboration and communication practices across scientific fields.

References

[1]
Cronin, B. (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 9, 1--24.
[2]
Guimera, R., Sales-Pardo, M., and Amaral, L. (2007). Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. Nature Physics, 3(1):63--69.
[3]
Hellsten, Lambiotte, Scharnhorst, and Ausloos (2007). Self-citations, co- authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists' field mobility? Scientometrics, 72:469--486
[4]
Howard, P. N. (2002), Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods New Media & Society, 4(4): 550--574
[5]
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures - How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Havard University Press.
[6]
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships. Research Evaluation, 11, 3--15.
[7]
Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconceiling Structure and Process in The Study of Scholarly Communication. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (59--72). Sage Publications.
[8]
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95--117.
[9]
Velden, T., Haque, A., and Lagoze, C. (2010). A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientometrics, 85(1):219--242
[10]
Velden, T., Haque, A., and Lagoze, C. (2011). Resolving author name homonymy to improve resolution of structures in co-author networks. In Proceeding of JCDL '11, (241--250), ACM, New York, NY, USA.
[11]
Velden, T. (2011). A methodology for studying field differences in scientific communication --- explaining openness and sharing in two scientific communities in the chemical and physical sciences. PhD Thesis, Cornell University.
[12]
Wuchty S., Jones, B. F., Uzzi, B. (2007) The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science 316 (5827) p. 1036--1039

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
February 2012
667 pages
ISBN:9781450307826
DOI:10.1145/2132176

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 February 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. comparative research design
  2. ethnographic field studies
  3. field specific scientific communication practices
  4. network analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

iConference '12
iConference '12: iConference 2012
February 7 - 10, 2012
Ontario, Toronto, Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 129
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media