Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Delay optimal event detection on ad hoc wireless sensor networks

Published: 31 March 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We consider a small extent sensor network for event detection, in which nodes periodically take samples and then contend over a random access network to transmit their measurement packets to the fusion center. We consider two procedures at the fusion center for processing the measurements. The Bayesian setting, is assumed, that is, the fusion center has a prior distribution on the change time. In the first procedure, the decision algorithm at the fusion center is network--oblivious and makes a decision only when a complete vector of measurements taken at a sampling instant is available. In the second procedure, the decision algorithm at the fusion center is network--aware and processes measurements as they arrive, but in a time-causal order. In this case, the decision statistic depends on the network delays, whereas in the network--oblivious case, the decision statistic does not. This yields a Bayesian change-detection problem with a trade-off between the random network delay and the decision delay that is, a higher sampling rate reduces the decision delay but increases the random access delay. Under periodic sampling, in the network--oblivious case, the structure of the optimal stopping rule is the same as that without the network, and the optimal change detection delay decouples into the network delay and the optimal decision delay without the network. In the network--aware case, the optimal stopping problem is analyzed as a partially observable Markov decision process, in which the states of the queues and delays in the network need to be maintained. A sufficient decision statistic is the network state and the posterior probability of change having occurred, given the measurements received and the state of the network. The optimal regimes are studied using simulation.

References

[1]
Aldosari, S. A. and Moura, J. M. F. 2004. Detection in decentralized sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 277--280.
[2]
Baccelli, F. and Makowski, A. 1990. Synchronization in queueing systems. In Stochastic Analysis of Computer and Communication Systems, H. Takagi, Ed. North--Holland, 57--131.
[3]
Bertsekas, D. P. 2000a. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, 2nd Ed. vol. I. Athena Scientific.
[4]
Bertsekas, D. P. 2000b. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Second ed. Vol. II. Athena Scientific.
[5]
Honeywell Inc. http://hpsweb.honeywell.com/Cultures/en-US/Products/Wireless/SecondGeneration- Wireless/default.htm.
[6]
ISA. http://www.isa.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Technical_Information/ASCI/ISA100_Wireless_Compliance_Institute/ISA100_Wireless_Compliance_Institute.htm.
[7]
Kumar, A., Manjunath, D., and Kuri, J. 2004. Communication Networking: An Analytical Approach. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco.
[8]
Kumar, A., Manjunath, D., and Kuri, J. 2008. Wireless Networking. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco.
[9]
Niu, R. and Varshney, P. K. 2005. Distributed detection and fusion in a large wireless sensor network of random size. EURASIP J. Wirel. Comm. Netw. 4, 7, 462--472.
[10]
Premkumar, K. and Kumar, A. 2008. Optimal sleep-wake scheduling for quickest intrusion detection using wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Communications IEEE (INFOCOM).
[11]
Premkumar, K., Kumar, A., and Kuri, J. 2009. Distributed detection and localization of events in large ad hoc wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.
[12]
Rajasegarar, S., Leckie, C., and Palaniswami, M. 2008. Anomaly detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wirel. Comm. 15, 4, 34--40.
[13]
Shiryaev, A. N. 1978. Optimal Stopping Rules. Springer, New York.
[14]
Singh, C. K., Kumar, A., and Ameer, P. M. 2008. Performance evaluation of an IEEE 802.15.4 sensor network with star topology. Wirel. Netw. 14, 4, 543--568.
[15]
Tartakovsky, A. G. and Veeravalli, V. V. 2005. General asymptotic bayesian theory of quickest change detection. SIAM Theory Probab. Appl. 49, 3, 458--497.
[16]
Tenny, R. R. and Sandell, N. R. 1981. Detection with distributed sensors. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 17, 501--510.
[17]
Veeravalli, V. V. 2001. Decentralized quickest change detection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 4, 1657--1665.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Quickest Change Point Detection with Measurements over a Lossy Link2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC49753.2023.10384241(4843-4848)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • (2015)Event Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks in Random Spatial Sensors DeploymentsIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing10.1109/TSP.2015.245221863:22(6122-6135)Online publication date: Nov-2015
  • (2014)Distributed Event Detection in Sensor Networks under Random Spatial DeploymentProceedings of the 2014 IEEE Military Communications Conference10.1109/MILCOM.2014.110(623-629)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2014
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Shuang Li

This paper considers data fusion in ad hoc wireless sensor networks with event detection. Nodes periodically take samples and report their measurements to the fusion center by contention. Two procedures are investigated: network oblivious decision making (NODM) and network aware decision making (NADM). The first procedure makes the decision only when all of the samples are collected, while the second procedure takes into account the network delays; the tradeoff between the decision delay and the random access delay is yielded. Both procedures involve the investigation of the optimal stopping time, but the latter is analyzed as a partially observable Markov decision process. This is a solid piece of theoretical work with extensive simulations. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 8, Issue 2
March 2012
216 pages
ISSN:1550-4859
EISSN:1550-4867
DOI:10.1145/2140522
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 31 March 2012
Accepted: 01 October 2010
Revised: 01 December 2009
Received: 01 March 2009
Published in TOSN Volume 8, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Optimal change detection over a network
  2. cross--layer design of change detection
  3. detection delay

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Quickest Change Point Detection with Measurements over a Lossy Link2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC49753.2023.10384241(4843-4848)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2023
  • (2015)Event Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks in Random Spatial Sensors DeploymentsIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing10.1109/TSP.2015.245221863:22(6122-6135)Online publication date: Nov-2015
  • (2014)Distributed Event Detection in Sensor Networks under Random Spatial DeploymentProceedings of the 2014 IEEE Military Communications Conference10.1109/MILCOM.2014.110(623-629)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2014
  • (2013)Efficient event prewarning for sensor networks with multi microenvironmentsProceedings of the 19th international conference on Parallel Processing10.1007/978-3-642-40047-6_40(382-393)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2013
  • (2012)Optimal stopping strategies in collaborative event detection in wireless sensor networks2012 IV International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems10.1109/ICUMT.2012.6459779(842-849)Online publication date: Oct-2012

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media