Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2160673.2160681acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Considering failure: eight years of ITID research

Published: 12 March 2012 Publication History

Abstract

This paper examines forty articles published in the journal Information Technologies & International Development between 2003 and 2010 in an effort to identify commonalities among projects that failed to meet some or all of their development objectives. We considered whether the selected papers articulated clear development objectives, and whether baseline data was used to inform project design. We then considered two factors associated with how development objectives are implemented: the development perspective (top-down vs. bottom-up), and the project focus (the technology vs. the community). Our goal was not to find fault with our colleagues or their work, rather to advance the debate about the effectiveness of ICTD initiatives at a particularly important point in the history of the discipline. We conclude that top-down, technology-centric, goal-diffuse approaches to ICTD contribute to unsatisfactory development results. Careful consideration of development objectives, perspective and focus is essential in all phases of an ICTD project, from design to deployment. Honest and comprehensive reporting of failure (and success) helps ICTD researchers and practitioners focus on best practices in meeting critical development needs.

References

[1]
Heeks, R. and Molla, A. 2009. Impact assessment of ICT-for-Development projects: A compendium of approaches. Development Informatics. Working Paper Series. Paper No. 36. Development Informatics Group, Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester.
[2]
GSM Association. GSMA. (2008). The GSMA Development Fund Top 20: Research on the Economic and Social Impact of Mobile Communications in Developing Countries. GSMA. London, UK. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://www.gsmworld.com/about-us/index.htm.
[3]
World Bank. 2011. World Bank Information & Communication Technologies Sector Strategy. World Bank Approach Paper 2011. Retrieved June 22, 2011 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTICTSTRATEGY/Resources/2010-11-23_ICT_Sector_Strategy_Approach_Paper.pdf
[4]
Heeks. R. 2002. Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18, 101--112. DOI=10.1080/01972240290007503 9.
[5]
World Bank. Independent Evaluation Group. 2011. An Evaluation of World Bank Group Activities in Information and Communication Technologies. Capturing Technology for Development. The World Bank. Retrieved September 3, 2011 from http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/.
[6]
Failfaire. FAILFaire: Learning from #FAILs in ICT and mobiles for development. Retrieved March 16, 2011 from http://failfaire.org/.
[7]
Engineers Without Borders Canada. 2011. 2010 Failure Report. Learning from our Mistakes. Engineers Without Borders Canada. January, 2011. Retrieved March 4, 2010 from http://www.ewb.ca/en/whoweare/accountable/failure.html.
[8]
Best, M. 2010. Understanding Our Knowledge Gaps: Or, Do We Have an ICT4D Field? And Do We Want One? Information Technologies and International Development, 6 (SE, Special Edition, 2010), 49--52.
[9]
Easterly, W. 2006. The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. The Penguin Press. New York, New York.
[10]
Moyo, D. 2009. Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is a Better Way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giraux. New York, New York.
[11]
Tongia, R. 2006. Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICT4D) -- A Design Challenge? Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD2006 (Berkeley, California, May 25--26, 2006). ICTD 2006.
[12]
Wade, R. H., 2002. Bridging the digital divide: New route to development or new form of dependence? Global Governance. 8(4):443--467 (October-December, 2002). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[13]
Burrell, J. and Toyama, K. 2009. What Constitutes Good ICTD Research? Information Technologies and International Development, 5,3 (Fall, 2009), 82--94.
[14]
Hosman, L. 2010. Policies, Partnerships, and Pragmatism: Lessons from an ICT-in-Education Project in Rural Uganda. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 1(Spring 2010), 48--64.
[15]
Tongia, R. 2006. Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICT4D) -- A Design Challenge? Citing Rittel et al., 1973. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD2006 (Berkeley, California, May 25--26, 2006). ICTD 2006.
[16]
Dorflinger, J. and Gross, T. 2010. Mobile HCI and Technical ICTD: A Methodological Perspective. Proceedings from Mobile HCI '10. (Lisbon, Portugal, September 07--10, 2010).
[17]
Donner, J. and Toyama, K. Persistent Themes in ICTD Research: Priorities for Statistics and New Modes of Data Gathering. From IPMS Sessions. Retrieved April 02, 2011 from http://www.statssa.gov.za/isi2009/ScientificProgramme/IPMS/0358.pdf.
[18]
Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E. 2011. Poor Economics. A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. PublicAffairs. New York, New York.
[19]
A. Krishna, P. Kristjanson, J. Kuan, G. Quilca, M. Radeny, and A. Sanchez-Urrelo. 2006. Fixing the Hole in the Bucket: Household Poverty Dynamics in Forty Communities of the Peruvian Andes. Development and Change, 37(5):997--1021.
[20]
Collins, D., Morduch, J., Rutherford, S. and Ruthven, O. 2009. Portfolios of the Poor. How the World's Poor Live on $2 a Day. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.
[21]
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3):481--510. Retrieved May 11, 2011 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780199.
[22]
Heeks, R. 2009. The ICT4D 2.0 Manifesto: Where Next for ICTs and International Development? Development Informatics. Working Paper Series. Paper No. 42. Development Informatics Group, Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester.
[23]
Mengesha, N. T. 2010. Sociotechnical Dynamics in IS Development in Organizations: The Case of a Resource-Constrained and Competitive Context. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 3 (Fall 2010), 33--50.
[24]
Best, M. and Kumar, R. 2008. Sustainability Failures of Rural Telecenters: Challenges from the Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) Project. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 4 (Fall/Winter 2008), 31--45.
[25]
Duncombe, R. 2009. Impact Assessment of Mobile Phones on Development: Concepts, Methods and Lessons for Practice. Development Informatics. Working Paper Series. Paper No. 39. Development Informatics Group, Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester.
[26]
Banga, K., Liesman, T., Meulensteen, A. and Wiemer, J. 2009. Budgets, Batteries, and Barriers. PDA Implementation Issues for NGOs. (April, 2009). Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University.
[27]
Baumard, P and Starbuck, W. 2005. Learning from Failures: Why it may not happen. Journal of Long Range Planning, 38 (2005) 281--298. DOI=10.1016/j.lrp.2005.03.004.
[28]
Sitkin, S. B. 1992. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. In Research in Organizational Behavior, L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw, Eds. 14, 231--266. As cited by Baumard, P. and Starbuck, W. in Journal of Long Range Planning, 38 (2005) 281--298.
[29]
Edmondson, A. and Cannon, M. 2005. The Hard Work of Failure Analysis. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge (August 22, 2005). Retrieved from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/4549.html.
[30]
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition. Free Press. New York, New York.
[31]
DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19,4 (Spring, 2003) 9--30.
[32]
Orlikowski, W. J. and Iacono, S. 2001. Desperately seeking the IT in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Journal of Information Systems Research, 12, 2 (2001), 121--134.
[33]
Dourish, P. 2004. Where the Action is. The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[34]
Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. 1992. Connections. New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[35]
Information Technologies and International Development. Retrieved from http://itidjournal.org/itid.
[36]
Mascarenhas, O. 2010. Broadening the Agenda for ICTs for Poverty Reduction: PICTURE-Africa. Information Technologies and International Development, 6 (SE, Special Edition), 37--44.
[37]
Alampay, E. and Bala, G. 2010. Mobile 2.0: M-money for the BoP in the Philippines. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 4 (Winter 2010), 77--92.
[38]
Veeraraghavan, R. Yasodhar, N. and Toyama, K. 2009. Warana Unwired: Replacing PCs with Mobile Phones in a Rural Sugarcane Cooperative. Information Technologies and International Development, 5,1 (Spring 2009), 81--95.
[39]
Parkinson, S. and Lauzon, A. 2008. The Impact of the Internet on Local Social Equity: A Study of a Telecenter in Aguablanca, Colombia. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 3 (Spring/Summer 2008), 21--38.
[40]
Mariscal, J., Gutierrez, L. H., and Botelho, A. J. J. 2009. Employment and Youth Inclusion into the Labor Force via Training in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs): The Cases of Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 2 (Summer 2009), 19--30.
[41]
Richardson, J. 2008. ICT in Education Reform in Cambodia: Problems, Politics, and Policies Impacting Implementation. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 4 (Fall/Winter 2008), 67--82.
[42]
Sinha, C. 2009. Effects of Education and ICT Use on Gender Relations in Bhutan. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 3 (Fall 2009), 21--34.
[43]
Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., Church, M. and Fort, L. 2004. Shoestring Evaluation: Designing Impact Evaluations under Budget, Time and Data Constraints. American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 1: 5--37.
[44]
Vasudevan, R. 2007. Changed Governance or Computerized Governance? Computerized Property Transfer Processes in Tamil Nadu, India. Information Technologies and International Development, 4,1 (Fall 2007), 101--112.
[45]
Frohlich, D., Bhat, R., Jones, M., Lalmas, M., Frank, M., Rachovides, D. Tucker, R. and Riga, K. 2009. Democracy, Design, and Development in Community Content Creation: Lessons From the StoryBank Project. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 4 (Winter 2009), 19--35.
[46]
Korsah, G. A., Mostow, J. & Dias, M. B., Sweet, T. M., Belousov, S. M., Dias, F. M., & Gong, H. 2010. Improving Child Literacy in Africa: Experiments with an Automated Reading Tutor. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 2 (Summer 2010), 1--19.
[47]
Dangwal, R., Jha, S., Chatterjee, S., and Mitra, S. 2005. A Model of How Children Acquire Computing Skills from Hole-in-the-Wall Computers in Public Places. Information Technologies and International Development, 2, 4 (Summer 2005), 41--60.
[48]
Wagner, D. A., Daswani, C. J. and Karnati, R. 2010. Technology and Mother-Tongue Literacy in Southern India: Impact Studies among Young Children and Out-of-School Youth. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 4 (Winter 2010), 23--43.
[49]
Panchard, J., Rao, S., Prabhakar, T. V., Hubaux, J. and Jamadagni, H. S. 2007. COMMONSense Net: A Wireless Sensor Network for Resource-Poor Agriculture in the Semiarid Areas of Developing Countries. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 1 (Fall 2007), 51--67.
[50]
Heffernan, C. and Nielsen, L. 2007. The Livestock Guru: The Design and Testing of a Tool for Knowledge Transfer among the Poor. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 1 (Fall 2007), 113--121.
[51]
Ghandi, R., Veeraraghavan, R., Toyama, K. and Ramprasad, V. 2009. Digital Green: Participatory Video and Mediated Instruction for Agricultural Extension. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 1 (Spring 2009), 1--15.
[52]
Patterson, D. J., Sim, S. E. and Aiyelokun, T. 2009. Overcoming Blind Spots in Interaction Design: A Case Study in Designing for African AIDS Orphan Care Communities. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 4 (Winter 2009), 75--88.
[53]
Best, M. L., Smyth, T. N., Etherton, J. and Wornyo, E. 2010. Uses of Mobile Phones in Post-Conflict Liberia. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 2 (Summer 2010), 91--108.
[54]
Pal, J., Patra, R., Nedevschi, S., Plauche, M. and Pawar, U. 2009. The Case of the Occasionally Cheap Computer: Low-cost Devices and Classrooms in the Developing World. Information Technologies and International Development, 5, 1 (Spring 2009), 49--64.
[55]
Graham, M. 2010. Justifying Virtual Presence in the Thai Silk Industry: Links Between Data and Discourse. Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 4 (Winter 2010), 57--70.
[56]
Corbett, J. M., & Keller, C. P. 2004. Empowerment and Participatory Geographic Information and Multimedia Systems: Observations from Two Communities in Indonesia. Information Technologies and International Development, 2, 2 (Winter 2004), 25--44.
[57]
Medhi, I., Sagar, A. and Toyama, K. 2007. Text-Free User Interfaces for Illiterate and Semiliterate Users. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 1 (Fall 2007), 37--50.
[58]
Sterling, R. and Rangaswamy, N. 2010. Constructing Informed Consent in ICTD Research. Proceedings of ICTD 2010, the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (London, England, December 13--16, 2010) IEEE. ICTD 2010.
[59]
Kothari, B., Pandey, A. and Chudgar, A. 2004. Reading Out of the "Idiot Box": Same-Language Subtitling on Television in India. Information Technologies and International Development, 2, 1 (Fall 2004), 23--44.
[60]
Toyama, K. as quoted by Stross, R. 2010. Two Billion Laptops? It May Not Be Enough. The New York Times. (April 17 2010).
[61]
Trucano, M. as quoted by Strom, S. 2010. With Humor, Nonprofits Review Technology Failures as Learning Experience. The New York Times (August 17, 2010).
[62]
Abraham, R. 2007. Mobile Phones and Economic Development: Evidence From the Fishing Industry in India. Information Technologies & International Development, 4, 1 (Fall 2007), 5--17.
[63]
Agarwal, S. K., Kumar, A., Nanavati, A. A., and Rajput, N. 2010. User-Generated Content Creation and Dissemination in Rural Areas. Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 2 (Summer 2010), 21--37.
[64]
Best, M. L., Thakur, D., and B. Kolko, B. 2010. The Contribution of User-Based Subsidies to the Impact and Sustainability of Telecenters---The eCenter Project in Kyrgyzstan. Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 2 (Summer 2010), 75--89.
[65]
Bhatnagar, S. C. and Singh, N. 2010. Assessing the Impact of E-Government: A Study of Projects in India. Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 2 (Summer 2010), 109--127.
[66]
Donner, J. 2006. The Use of Mobile Phones by Microentrepreneurs in Kigali, Rwanda: Changes to Social and Business Networks. Information Technologies & International Development, 3, 2 (Winter 2006), 3--19.
[67]
Esselaar, S., Stork, C., Ndiwalana, A., and Deen-Swarray, M. 2007. ICT Usage and Its Impact on Profitability of SMEs in 13 African Countries. Information Technologies & International Development, 4, 1 (Fall 2007), 87--100.
[68]
Hall, P., Ghimire, G., and Newton, M. 2009. Why Don't People Use Nepali Language Software? Information Technologies & International Development. 5, 1 (Spring 2009), 65--79.
[69]
Jagun, A., Heeks, R., and Whalley, J. 2008. The Impact of Mobile Telephony on Developing Country Micro-Enterprise: A Nigerian Case Study. Information Technologies & International Development, 4, 4 (Fall/Winter 2008), 47--65.
[70]
Konstadakopulos, D. 2005. From Public Loudspeakers to the Internet: The Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) by Small-Enterprise Clusters in Vietnam. Information Technologies & International Development, 2, 4 (Summer 2005), 21--39.
[71]
Plauché, M. and Nallasamy, U. 2007. Speech Interfaces for Equitable Access to Information Technology. Information Technologies & International Development, 4, 1 (Fall 2007) 69--86.
[72]
Micevska, M. 2005. Telecommunications, Public Health, and Demand for Health-Related Information and Infrastructure. Information Technologies & International Development, 2, 3 (Spring 2005), 57--72.
[73]
Miller, N. L. 2004. Measuring the Contribution of Infoplazas to Internet Penetration and Use in Panama. Information Technologies & International Development, 2, 2 (Winter 2004), 1--23.
[74]
Mitra, S., Tooley, J., Inamdar, P., and Dixon, P. 2003. Improving English Pronunciation: An Automated Instructional Approach. Information Technologies & International Development, 1, 1 (Fall 2003), 75--84.
[75]
Rangaswamy, N. and Nair, S. 2010. The Mobile Phone Store Ecology in a Mumbai Slum Community: Hybrid Networks for Enterprise. Information Technologies & International Development, 6, 3 (, Fall 2010), 51--65.
[76]
Walton, R., Putnam, C., Johnson, E., and Kolko, B. 2009. Skills Are Not Binary: Nuances in the Relationship Between ICT Skills and Employability. Information Technologies & International Development, 5, 7 (Summer 2009), 1--18.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Organisational Support for ICT4D Practitioner Performance: A New Pathway for Enhancing ICT4D Project OutcomesImplications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development10.1007/978-3-031-66986-6_25(341-361)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)If We Build it, Will They Come? Strategies to Advance High Impact, Digital Inclusion EcosystemsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4533172Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Theorizing ‘The Gap’ Twenty Years Later: Global Development, Design, and Speculative Ethics in Edtech ResearchPostdigital Science and Education10.1007/s42438-023-00429-16:1(231-258)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Considering failure: eight years of ITID research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICTD '12: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
    March 2012
    374 pages
    ISBN:9781450310451
    DOI:10.1145/2160673
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • UNESCO
    • Microsoft: Microsoft
    • IDRC: International Development Research Centre
    • Royal Holloway, University of London: Royal Holloway, University of London

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 March 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ICT4D
    2. ICTD
    3. ITID
    4. community development
    5. failure
    6. international development
    7. millennium development goals

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ICTD '12
    Sponsor:
    • Microsoft
    • IDRC
    • Royal Holloway, University of London

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 22 of 116 submissions, 19%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Organisational Support for ICT4D Practitioner Performance: A New Pathway for Enhancing ICT4D Project OutcomesImplications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development10.1007/978-3-031-66986-6_25(341-361)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
    • (2023)If We Build it, Will They Come? Strategies to Advance High Impact, Digital Inclusion EcosystemsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4533172Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Theorizing ‘The Gap’ Twenty Years Later: Global Development, Design, and Speculative Ethics in Edtech ResearchPostdigital Science and Education10.1007/s42438-023-00429-16:1(231-258)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Use of Locally Valued Non-state ICTs by Market Actors: A Case of Transforming Agriculture Marketing in Karnataka, IndiaAfter Latour: Globalisation, Inequity and Climate Change10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_8(78-91)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2023
    • (2022)6 Years Later: Examining Long-term Project OutcomesProceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3530190.3534825(1-11)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
    • (2022)RAPD: Rapid and Participatory Application Development of Usable Systems During COVID19 CrisisIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.320358210(93601-93614)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)Towards a process framework to guide the development of ICT4D programs: a South African perspectiveInformation Technology for Development10.1080/02681102.2022.212344229:4(488-524)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Codesign in resource-limited societies: theoretical perspectives, inputs, outputs and influencing factorsResearch in Engineering Design10.1007/s00163-022-00384-133:2(191-211)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2022
    • (2022)Competing Logics in an ICT4D Partnership: Case Evidence from IndonesiaFreedom and Social Inclusion in a Connected World10.1007/978-3-031-19429-0_31(515-530)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Processes of frugal social innovation: Creative approaches in underserved South African communitiesTHE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES10.1002/isd2.1222088:3Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media