Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187839acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using control theory for stable and efficient recommender systems

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

The aim of a web-based recommender system is to provide highly accurate and up-to-date recommendations to its users; in practice, it will hope to retain its users over time. However, this raises unique challenges. To achieve complex goals such as keeping the recommender model up-to-date over time, we need to consider a number of external requirements. Generally, these requirements arise from the physical nature of the system, for instance the available computational resources. Ideally, we would like to design a system that does not deviate from the required outcome. Modeling such a system over time requires to describe the internal dynamics as a combination of the underlying recommender model and the its users' behavior. We propose to solve this problem by applying the principles of modern control theory - a powerful set of tools to deal with dynamical systems - to construct and maintain a stable and robust recommender system for dynamically evolving environments. In particular, we introduce a design principle by focusing on the dynamic relationship between the recommender system's performance and the number of new training samples the system requires. This enables us to automate the control other external factors such as the system's update frequency. We show that, by using a Proportional-Integral-Derivative controller, a recommender system is able to automatically and accurately estimate the required input to keep the output close to a pre-defined requirements. Our experiments on a standard rating dataset show that, by using a feedback loop between system performance and training, the trade-off between the effectiveness and efficiency of the system can be well maintained. We close by discussing the widespread applicability of our approach to a variety of scenarios that recommender systems face.

References

[1]
E. Adar, J. Teevan, and S. Dumais. Resonance on the Web: Web Dynamics and Revisitation Patterns. In ACM CHI, 2009.
[2]
E. Adar, J. Teevan, S. Dumais, and J. Elsas. The Web Changes Everything: Understanding the Dynamics of Web Content. In ACM WSDM, 2009.
[3]
G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Towards the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE TKDE, 2005.
[4]
H. Ahn. A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Information Sciences, 2008.
[5]
K. H. Ang, G. Chong, S. Member, and Y. Li. Pid control system analysis, design, and technology. In IEEE Control Systems, 2005.
[6]
K. Astrom and T. Hagglund. Advanced PID control. 2006.
[7]
E. Bacry, J. Delour, and J. Muzy. Multifractal random walk. Physical Review E, 2001.
[8]
R. Bell and Y. Koren. Scalable collaborative filtering with jointly derived neighborhood interpolation weights. In ICDM, 2007.
[9]
R. Burke. Evaluating the dynamic properties of recommendation algorithms. In ACM RecSys, 2010.
[10]
DataSet. MovieLens: http://www.grouplens.org/.
[11]
A. Einstein. On the theory of the brownian movement. Annalen der Physik, 1906.
[12]
T. Friesz, J. Luque, R. Tobin, and B. Wie. Dynamic network traffic assignment considered as a continuous time optimal control problem. Operations Research, 1989.
[13]
S. Funk. Netflix update: Try this at home. http://sifter.org/ simon/journal/20061211.html, 2006.
[14]
J. Hamilton. Time series analysis. 1994.
[15]
A. S. Harpale and Y. Yang. Personalized active learning for collaborative filtering. In ACM SIGIR, 2008.
[16]
Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In ICDM, 2008.
[17]
T. Jambor and J. Wang. Optimizing multiple objectives in collaborative filtering. In ACM RecSys, 2010.
[18]
J. Kleinberg. Temporal Dynamics of On-Line Information Streams. Data Stream Management: Processing High Speed Data Streams, 2004.
[19]
Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In ACM SIGKDD, 2009.
[20]
N. Lathia. Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Over Time. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University College London, 2010.
[21]
N. Lathia, S. Hailes, and L. Capra. Temporal Diversity in Recommender Systems. In ACM SIGIR, 2010.
[22]
K. Meng, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, X. C. Xiao, and G. du Zhang. Control theory based rating recommendation for reputation systems. In Proc. of ICNSC, 2006.
[23]
M. Mull. Characteristics of High-Volume Recommender Systems. In Recommenders Workshop, 2006.
[24]
K. Ogata. Discrete-time control systems. 1987.
[25]
K. Ogata. Modern Control Engineering. 2001.
[26]
S. Parekh, N. Gandhi, J. Hellerstein, D. Tilbury, T. Jayram, and J. Bigus. Using Control Theory to Achieve Service Level Objectives In Performance Management. Real Time Systems, 2002.
[27]
S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Online-Updating Regularized Kernel Matrix Factorization Models for Large-Scale Recommender Systems. In ACM RecSys, 2008.
[28]
T. Tsunoda and M. Hoshino. Automatic metadata expansion and indirect collaborative filtering for TV program recommendation system. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2008.
[29]
V. Zanardi and L. Capra. Dynamic updating of online recommender systems via feed-forward controllers. In SEAMS, 2011.
[30]
J. Ziegler and N. Nichols. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control, 1993.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Survey on Trustworthy Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/3652891Online publication date: 13-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Ranking with Long-Term ConstraintsProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635819(47-56)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Scheduling on a budget: Avoiding stale recommendations with timely updatesMachine Learning with Applications10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.10045511(100455)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
April 2012
1078 pages
ISBN:9781450312295
DOI:10.1145/2187836
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 April 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. control theory
  2. recommender systems
  3. temporal analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WWW 2012
Sponsor:
  • Univ. de Lyon
WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
April 16 - 20, 2012
Lyon, France

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Survey on Trustworthy Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/3652891Online publication date: 13-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Ranking with Long-Term ConstraintsProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635819(47-56)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Scheduling on a budget: Avoiding stale recommendations with timely updatesMachine Learning with Applications10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.10045511(100455)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2019)Bid Optimization by Multivariable Control in Display AdvertisingProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3292500.3330681(1966-1974)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
  • (2017)Personalized Multimedia Recommendations for Cloud-Integrated Cyber-Physical SystemsIEEE Systems Journal10.1109/JSYST.2015.244043111:1(106-117)Online publication date: Mar-2017
  • (2017)Self-tuning approach for implementing a multidimensional recommendation system using PID2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT)10.1109/IPACT.2017.8244895(1-4)Online publication date: Apr-2017
  • (2016)Dynamic Information Retrieval ModelingSynthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services10.2200/S00718ED1V01Y201605ICR0498:3(1-144)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2016
  • (2016)Feedback Control of Real-Time Display AdvertisingProceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/2835776.2835843(407-416)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2016
  • (2015)Dynamic Information RetrievalProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/2808194.2809457(61-70)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2015
  • (2015)Personalized online video recommendations by using adaptive feedback control frameworks2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)10.1109/ICC.2015.7248491(1232-1237)Online publication date: Jun-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media