Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2232817.2232880acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A qualitative analysis of information dissemination through twitter in a digital library

Published: 10 June 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This study examines the use of Twitter in a digital library, the Internet Public Library (ipl2), to understand the content and dissemination patterns of Twitter messages posted by the ipl2. We conducted a content analysis on ipl2's messages on Twitter to develop a categorization of the type of tweets, and examined retweets and the active users who retweeted ipl2 tweets. We present our analysis of four areas related to the tweets: motivation, content, audience, and sources. Active users are categorized into eight groups. The research findings contribute to a further understanding of the actual use of Twitter in a digital library.

    References

    [1]
    Aharony, N. 2011. Twitter use in libraries: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Web Librarianship. 4, 4, 333--350.
    [2]
    Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., and Gummadi, K. P. 2010. Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. (Washington, USA, 2010). AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 10--17.
    [3]
    Dann, S. 2010. Twitter content classification. First Monday, 15 (Dec. 2010).
    [4]
    Honeycutt, C., and Herring, S. C. 2009. Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
    [5]
    Ipl2, The Mission and Vision Statements of ipl2. 2008. Retrieved Jan 10, 2011, from ipl2: http://ipl2.org/div/about/mission_and_vision.html
    [6]
    Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. 2007. Why we Twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA--KDD Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, 56--65.
    [7]
    Levy, M. R., and Windahl, S. 1984. Audience activity and gratifications: a conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research. 11, 1, 51--78.
    [8]
    Milstein, S. 2009. Twitter for libraries (and librarians). Computers in Libraries. 29, 5, 17--18.
    [9]
    Naaman, B., Boase, J., and Lai, C.-H. 2010. Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on CSCW, Feb 6--10, 2010, Savannah, Georgia.
    [10]
    Phillips, N. K. 2011. Academic library use of Facebook: building relationships with students. The journal of Academic Librarianship. 37, 6, 512--522.
    [11]
    Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, London.
    [12]
    Stuart, D. 2010. What are libraries doing on Twitter?. Online, Jan/Feb, 45--47.
    [13]
    Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., and Chi, E. H. 2010. Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In Proceedings of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, Aug 20--22, 2010, Minneapolis, MN. Los Alamitos CA, 177--184.

    Index Terms

    1. A qualitative analysis of information dissemination through twitter in a digital library

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        JCDL '12: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries
        June 2012
        458 pages
        ISBN:9781450311540
        DOI:10.1145/2232817

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 10 June 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. digital library
        2. information dissemination
        3. ipl2
        4. microblogging
        5. retweet
        6. twitter

        Qualifiers

        • Poster

        Conference

        JCDL '12
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 325
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media