Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2361999.2362004acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecsaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An architecture framework for application-managed scaling of cloud-hosted relational databases

Published: 20 August 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Scaling relational database in the cloud is one of the critical factors in the migration of applications to the cloud. It is important that applications can directly monitor fine-grained scaling performance (such as consistency-related replication delays and query-specific response time) and specify application-specific policies for autonomic management of the scaling. However, there is no general mechanism and reusable framework and infrastructures to help this. The current facilities in cloud-hosted relational databases are also very limited in providing fine-grained and consumer-centric monitoring data. The situation is exacerbated by the complexity of the different underlying cloud technologies and the need to separate scaling policy from business logic. This paper presents an architecture framework to facilitate a consumer-centric, application-managed autonomic scaling of relational databases in cloud. The architecture framework includes a new consumer-centric monitoring infrastructure and customisable components for sensing, monitoring, analysing and actuation according to application-level scaling policies without modifying an existing application. We evaluated our framework using a modified Web 2.0 application benchmark. The results demonstrate the framework's ability to provide application-level flexibility in achieving improved throughput, data freshness (different levels of consistency) and monetary saving.

References

[1]
D. J. Abadi. Data Management in the Cloud: Limitations and Opportunities. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 32(1), 2009.
[2]
E. Cecchet and al. Middleware-based Database Replication: The Gaps Between Theory and Practice. In SIGMOD, 2008.
[3]
E. Cecchet and al. Dolly: virtualization-driven database provisioning for the cloud. In VEE, 2011.
[4]
F. Chang, J. Dean, S. Ghemawat, W. C. Hsieh, D. A. Wallach, M. Burrows, T. Chandra, A. Fikes, and R. Gruber. Bigtable: A distributed storage system for structured data. In OSDI, 2006.
[5]
B. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB. In SoCC, 2010.
[6]
G. DeCandia, D. Hastorun, M. Jampani, G. Kakulapati, A. Lakshman, A. Pilchin, S. Sivasubramanian, P. Vosshall, and W. Vogels. Dynamo: amazon's highly available key-value store. In SOSP, 2007.
[7]
A. Elmore and al. Zephyr: live migration in shared nothing databases for elastic cloud platforms. In SIGMOD, 2011.
[8]
D. Florescu and D. Kossmann. Rethinking cost and performance of database systems. SIGMOD Record, 38(1), 2009.
[9]
I. Gorton, Y. Liu, and N. Trivedi. An extensible, lightweight architecture for adaptive j2ee applications. In Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software engineering and middleware, SEM '06, pages 47--54, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[10]
M. C. Huebscher and J. A. McCann. A survey of autonomic computing---degrees, models, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv., 40(3): 7:1--7:28, Aug. 2008.
[11]
K. Keeton, C. B. M. III, C. A. N. Soules, and A. C. Veitch. LazyBase: freshness vs. performance in information management. Operating Systems Review, 44(1), 2010.
[12]
B. Kemme, R. Jiménez-Peris, and M. Patiño-Martínez. Database Replication. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010.
[13]
T. Kraska and al. Consistency Rationing in the Cloud: Pay only when it matters. PVLDB, 2(1), 2009.
[14]
S. Sakr, A. Liu, D. M. Batista, and M. Alomari. A survey of large scale data management approaches in cloud environments. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 13(3): 311--336, 2011.
[15]
S. Sakr, L. Zhao, H. Wada, and A. Liu. CloudDB AutoAdmin: Towards a Truly Elastic Cloud-Based Data Store. In ICWS, 2011.
[16]
J. Schad, J. Dittrich, and J. Quiané-Ruiz. Runtime Measurements in the Cloud: Observing, Analyzing, and Reducing Variance. PVLDB, 3(1), 2010.
[17]
W. Sobel, S. Subramanyam, A. Sucharitakul, J. Nguyen, H. Wong, S. Patil, A. Fox, and D. Patterson. Cloudstone: Multi-platform, multi-language benchmark and measurement tools for web 2.0. In Proc. of Cloud Computing and Its Applications (CCA), 2008.
[18]
A. A. Soror and al. Database Virtualization: A New Frontier for Database Tuning and Physical Design. In ICDE Workshops, 2007.
[19]
A. A. Soror, U. F. Minhas, A. Aboulnaga, K. Salem, P. Kokosielis, and S. Kamath. Automatic virtual machine configuration for database workloads. In SIGMOD, 2008.
[20]
V. T. K. Tran, K. Lee, A. Fekete, A. Liu, and J. Keung. Size Estimation of Cloud Migration Projects with Cloud Migration Point (CMP). In ESEM, 2011.
[21]
W. Vogels. Eventually consistent. Queue, 6: 14--19, October 2008.
[22]
S. wen Cheng, A. cheng Huang, D. Garlan, B. Schmerl, and P. Steenkiste. Rainbow: Architecture-based self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure. IEEE Computer, 37: 46--54, 2004.
[23]
L. Zhao, S. Sakr, A. Fekete, H. Wada, and A. Liu. Application-Managed Database Replication on Virtualized Cloud Environments. In Data Management in the Cloud (DMC), ICDE Workshops, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Perspectives and reflections on cloud computing and internet technologies from NordiCloud 2012Proceedings of the Second Nordic Symposium on Cloud Computing & Internet Technologies10.1145/2513534.2513547(72-79)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2013

Index Terms

  1. An architecture framework for application-managed scaling of cloud-hosted relational databases

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WICSA/ECSA '12: Proceedings of the WICSA/ECSA 2012 Companion Volume
      August 2012
      201 pages
      ISBN:9781450315685
      DOI:10.1145/2361999
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. actuator
      2. amazon EC2
      3. application-managed
      4. cloud
      5. framework
      6. monitor
      7. sensor

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WICSA/ECSA '12

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 48 of 72 submissions, 67%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2013)Perspectives and reflections on cloud computing and internet technologies from NordiCloud 2012Proceedings of the Second Nordic Symposium on Cloud Computing & Internet Technologies10.1145/2513534.2513547(72-79)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2013

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media