Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2362499.2362508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graph-based ontology analysis in the linked open data

Published: 05 September 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The Linked Open Data (LOD) includes over 31 billion Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples interlinked by around 504 million SameAs links (as of September 2011). The data sets of the LOD use different ontologies to describe instances, that cause the ontology heterogeneity problem. Dealing with the heterogeneous ontologies is a challenging problem and it is time-consuming to manually learn big ontologies in the LOD. The heterogeneity of ontologies in the LOD can be reduced by automatically integrating related ontology classes and properties, which can be retrieved from interlinked instances. The interlinked instances can be represented as an undirected graph, from which we can discover the characteristics of instances and retrieve related ontology classes and properties that are important for linking instances. In this paper, we retrieve graph patterns from several linked data sets and perform ontology alignment methods on each graph pattern to identify related ontology classes and properties from the data sets. We successfully integrate various ontologies, analyze the characteristics of interlinked instances, and detect mistaken properties in the real data sets. Furthermore, our approach solves the ontology heterogeneity problem and helps Semantic Web application developers easily query on various data sets with the integrated ontology.

    References

    [1]
    T. Berners-Lee. Linked Data - Design Issues, 2006. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
    [2]
    C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data - the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3):1--22, 2009.
    [3]
    D. Brickley and R. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation, 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
    [4]
    N. Choi, I.-Y. Song, and H. Han. A survey on ontology mapping. ACM SIGMOD Record, 35:34--41, 2006.
    [5]
    P. Cimiano. Ontology Learning and Population from Text: Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2006.
    [6]
    L. Ding, J. Shinavier, Z. Shangguan, and D. L. McGuinness. Sameas networks and beyond: Analyzing deployment status and implications of owl: sameas in linked data. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Semantic Web Conference, pages 145--160, 2010.
    [7]
    J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko. Ontology Matching. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2007.
    [8]
    C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.
    [9]
    T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool, 2011.
    [10]
    R. Ichise. An analysis of multiple similarity measures for ontology mapping problem. International Journal of Semantic Computing, 4(1):103--122, 2010.
    [11]
    N.-T. Le, R. Ichise, and H.-B. Le. Detecting hidden relations in geographic data. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing, pages 61--68, 2010.
    [12]
    J. Lin and C. Dyer. Data-Intensive Text Processing with MapReduce. Morgan & Claypool, 2010.
    [13]
    C. Meilicke, J. Völker, and H. Stuckenschmidt. Learning disjointness for debugging mappings between lightweight ontologies. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pages 93--108, 2008.
    [14]
    R. Parundekar, C. A. Knoblock, and J. L. Ambite. Linking and building ontologies of linked data. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Semantic Web Conference, pages 598--614, 2010.
    [15]
    S. Pavel and J. Euzenat. Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 99(PrePrints), 2011.
    [16]
    T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi. Wordnet::similarity: Measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1024--1025, 2004.
    [17]
    M. F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. In Readings in Information Retrieval, pages 313--316. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1997.
    [18]
    P. Shannon, A. Markiel, O. Ozier, N. S. Baliga, J. T. Wang, D. Ramage, N. Amin, B. Schwikowski, and T. Ideker. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 13(11):2498--2504, 2003.
    [19]
    W. E. Winkler. Overview of record linkage and current research directions. Technical report, Statistical Research Division U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2006.
    [20]
    L. Zhao and R. Ichise. Mid-ontology learning from linked data. In Proceedings of the Joint International Semantic Technology Conference, pages 112--127, 2011.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)Alignment and dataset identification of linked data in Semantic WebWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1002/widm.11214:2(139-151)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2018
    • (2016)An unsupervised data-driven method to discover equivalent relations in large Linked DatasetsSemantic Web10.3233/SW-1501938:2(197-223)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2016
    • (2016)Automatic Erroneous Data Detection over Type-Annotated Linked DataIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2015DAP0022E99.D:4(969-978)Online publication date: 2016
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    I-SEMANTICS '12: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems
    September 2012
    215 pages
    ISBN:9781450311120
    DOI:10.1145/2362499
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. graph pattern
    2. linked data
    3. ontology alignment

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    I-SEMANTICS '12

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 182 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)Alignment and dataset identification of linked data in Semantic WebWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1002/widm.11214:2(139-151)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2018
    • (2016)An unsupervised data-driven method to discover equivalent relations in large Linked DatasetsSemantic Web10.3233/SW-1501938:2(197-223)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2016
    • (2016)Automatic Erroneous Data Detection over Type-Annotated Linked DataIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2015DAP0022E99.D:4(969-978)Online publication date: 2016
    • (2015)Detecting Identical Entities in the Semantic Web DataProceedings of the 41st International Conference on SOFSEM 2015: Theory and Practice of Computer Science - Volume 893910.1007/978-3-662-46078-8_43(519-530)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2015
    • (2014)Ontology Integration for Linked DataJournal on Data Semantics10.1007/s13740-014-0041-93:4(237-254)Online publication date: 25-May-2014
    • (2013)Integrating Ontologies Using Ontology Learning ApproachIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.E96.D.40E96.D:1(40-50)Online publication date: 2013
    • (2013)A statistical and schema independent approach to identify equivalent properties on linked dataProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems10.1145/2506182.2506187(33-40)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2013
    • (2013)Instance-Based Ontological Knowledge AcquisitionThe Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_11(155-169)Online publication date: 2013

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media