Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2369220.2369254acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining the viability of mixed framework for evaluating mobile services impact in rural India

Published: 13 December 2010 Publication History

Abstract

This paper examines the proposed framework for evaluating the impact of the intervention of mobile-based services on socio-economic development of Indian rural areas. Framework suitability has been studied using case study method with pilot test data. Existing literature shows multiple ways of studying mobile impact through different frameworks. The need for uniform framework is the felt need as various user-centric mobile services launched across rural markets. India becomes a field-testing ground for most of the multinational firms who want to test their innovative business models. This framework provides a testing method for socioeconomic development impact on rural areas. This study adopted socio economic criteria (SEC) used by Indian marketers as basis for sample selection. The pilot study clearly shown that field is ready to test the proposed framework.

References

[1]
COI. 2001. "Census data 2001.Number of Literates & Literacy Rate.
[2]
Meitei, L. Santa and Devi, Th. Purnima. 2009. Farmers information needs in rural Manipur: an assessment. Annals of Library and Information Studies, vol. 56, pp. 35--40.
[3]
Warton, IK. 2009. Dial 'M' for 'Mackerel': Can new mobile services promise economic empowerment. India Knowledge Wharton published on 27th August.
[4]
Danielson Anders. 2001. When do the poor benefit from growth, and why. Poverty and Growth workshop, Lidingo.
[5]
Rao, V. Kasina and Sonar. 2009. Farmers Needs and the Use of Mobile Services and Applications: A Study on Indian Pilots. Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital, Institute of Management Technology Ghaziabad, India.
[6]
Donner, J and Escobari, M. 2009. A review of the research on mobile use by micro and small enterprises (MSEs). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Doha, CA: IEEE, pp. 17--26.
[7]
Donner, J. 2008. Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: A review of the literature. The Information Society, vol. 24, pp. 140--159.
[8]
Bhatnagar, G. Subash and Nupur Singh. 2009. Results from a Study of Impact of E-government Projects in India. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (ICTD 2009). Doha, CA: IEEE, pp. 183--191.
[9]
Helen Nierinck. 2008. Mobile proximity payments: Scenario for market development. Analysis Mason, Research Report table 1.1.
[10]
Aditya Dev Sood. 2006. The mobile development report. Research Report, Nokia -- Center for knowledge societies (CKS), Bangalore.
[11]
Banks, K. and Burge R. 2004. Mobile Phones: An appropriate tool for conservation and development. Fauna & Flora International, Cambridge, UK.
[12]
Krishna Reddy, P. 2004. A Framework of Information Technology Based Agriculture Information Dissemination System to Improve Crop Productivity. Proceedings of 22nd Annual Conference of APEA.
[13]
NSN-CTO. 2008. Towards effective e-governance: The delivery of public services through local e-content. Research Report, Nokia Siemens Networks, Nokia and Commonwealth Telecommunications Organization (CTO).
[14]
Prernasri. 2008. Cellphones and (Rural) development. Think Change India, Web Magazine article.
[15]
Richard Duncombe. 2006. Using the livelihoods framework to analyze ICT applications for poverty reduction through micro enterprise. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Information Technologies and International Development, vol. 3.3, pp. 81--100.
[16]
Jensen, R. 2007. The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 122, pp. 879--924.
[17]
Abraham, R. 2006. Mobile phones and economic development: Evidence from the fishing industry in India. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (ICTD 2006). Berkeley, CA: IEEE, pp. 48--56.
[18]
David Souler, Nigel Scott, Christopher Garforth, Rekha Jain, Ophelia Mascarenhas and Kevin McKemey. 2005. The Economic Impact of Telecommunications on Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction: A study of rural communities in India (Gujarat), Mozambique and Tanzania. DFID KAR Project-8347.
[19]
Meera, S. N., Jhamtani, A. and Rao, D. U. M. 2006. Information and communication technology in agricultural development: A comparative analysis of three projects from India. Network Paper no. 135, Overseas Development Institute, London.
[20]
Surabhi Mittal, Sanjay Gandhi and Gaurav Tripathi. 2010. Socio-economic impact of mobile phones on Indian Agriculture. Working Paper no. 246, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi.
[21]
Nigel Nagarajan and Marc Vanheukelen. 1997. Evaluating EU expenditure programmes: A Guide. Ex post and Intermediate Evaluation, XIX/02-Budgetary overview and evaluation Directorate general-Budgets, European Commission.
[22]
Robin. 1974. Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, No. 5, pp. 688--701.
[23]
Fedes Van Rijn, Kees Burger and Eefje Den Belder. 2008. A Socio-Economic Impact study of the DE Foundation Coffee Project Peru. M.Sc. Thesis, Wageningen University.
[24]
Bryson A., Dorsett R. and Purdon S. 2002. The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies. A study carried out on behalf of the department for work and pensions, Policy Studies Institute and National Centre for Social Research, London.
[25]
Heeks, Richard and Molla, Alemayehu. 2009. Impact assessment of ICT-for-development projects: A compendium of approaches. Working Paper Series, Development Informatics Group, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Manchester.
[26]
Parkinson, S. and Ramirez R. 2006. Using a sustainable livelihoods approach to assessing the impact of ICTs in development. Community Informatics, vol. 2.3, pp. 116--127.
[27]
Molla, A. and Al Jaghoub, S. 2007. Evaluating digital inclusion projects: a livelihood approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, vol. 3.6, pp. 592--611.
[28]
DFID. 1999. Sustainable Livelihood Guidance Sheet Section 2. DFID, London.
[29]
Laura Hosman, Elizabeth Fife and Laura Elizabeth Armey,. 2008. The Case for a Multi-Methodological, Cross-Disciplinary Approach to the Analysis of ICT Investment and Projects in the Developing World. Information technology for Development, Vol. 14(4), pp. 308--327.
[30]
Garson, D. 2005. Case studies. Chass PA765.
[31]
Yin, R. 1984. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.
[32]
Winston, T. 1997. Introduction to Case Study by Winston Tellis. The Qualitative Report, vol. 3.2.
[33]
Winston, T. 1997. Introduction to Case Study {68 paragraphs}. The Qualitative Report {On-line serial}, vol. 3.2.
[34]
Yin, R. 1994. Case study research: design and methods, 2nd Edition, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
[35]
Miles, B. Matthew. 1979. Qualitative data as an Attractive Nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 24 (4), pp. 590--601.
[36]
Izak, Benbasat, David K. Goldstein and Melissa Mead. 1987. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, vol. 11.3, pp. 369--386.
[37]
RetailBiz. 2006. Socio Economic Classes (SEC categories).
[38]
Naukarihub. 2008. Socio-Economic Classification.
[39]
Kotler Philip, Keller Kevin Lane, Koshy Abraham and Jha Mithileshwar. 2009. Marketing Management - A South Asian Perspective, 13th Edition, Pearson education publication.
[40]
MSP. 2005. Socio Economic Classification (SEC), Ministry of Statistics and Planning.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Modeling the barriers of service adoption in rural Indian telecom using integrated ISM-ANPJournal of Modelling in Management10.1108/JM2-09-2013-004111:1(2-25)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2016
  • (2015)ICT Infrastructure Framework for Microfinance Institutions and Banks in PakistanBanking, Finance, and Accounting10.4018/978-1-4666-6268-1.ch028(532-543)Online publication date: 2015
  • (2013)ICT Infrastructure Framework for Microfinance Institutions and Banks in PakistanInternational Journal of Online Marketing10.4018/ijom.20130401053:2(75-86)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICTD '10: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
December 2010
479 pages
ISBN:9781450307871
DOI:10.1145/2369220
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 December 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. mobile services
  2. socio-economic criteria
  3. socio-economic impact
  4. user needs

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICTD '10

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 22 of 116 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Modeling the barriers of service adoption in rural Indian telecom using integrated ISM-ANPJournal of Modelling in Management10.1108/JM2-09-2013-004111:1(2-25)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2016
  • (2015)ICT Infrastructure Framework for Microfinance Institutions and Banks in PakistanBanking, Finance, and Accounting10.4018/978-1-4666-6268-1.ch028(532-543)Online publication date: 2015
  • (2013)ICT Infrastructure Framework for Microfinance Institutions and Banks in PakistanInternational Journal of Online Marketing10.4018/ijom.20130401053:2(75-86)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media