Article

Free access

Remote evaluation: the network as an extension of the usability laboratory

Authors:

H. Rex Hartson,

José C. Castillo,

John Kelso,

Wayne C. NealeAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '96: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 228 - 235

https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238511

Published: 13 April 1996 Publication History

All formats PDF

References

[1]

Abelow, D. Automating Feedback on Software Product Use. CASE Trends (December 1993), 15-17.

Google Scholar

[2]

del Galdo, E. M., Williges, R. C., Williges, B. H., and Wixon, D. R. An Evaluation of Critical Incidents for Software Documentation Design. In Proceedings of Thirtieth Annual Human Factors Society Conference Human Factors Society, Anaheim, CA, 1986, 19-23.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

Fitts, P. M., and Jones, R. E. "Psychological aspects of instrument display." Selected Papers on Human Factors in the Design and Use of Control Systems. 1: Analysis of 270 "Pilot Error" Experiences in Reading and Interpreting Aircraft Instruments. Sinaiko ed., Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1947.

Google Scholar

[4]

Hix, D., and Hartson, H. R. Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product and Process. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Hix, D., and Hartson, H. R. IDEAL: An Environment for User-Centered Development of User Interfaces. In Proceedings of EWHCI'94: Fourth East-West International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (St. Petersburg, Russia, August 2-6), 1994, 195-211.

Google Scholar

[6]

Nolan, P. R. Welcome to Vertical Research. Vertical Research, Inc., P.O. Box 1214, Brookline, MA 02146, USA. (1995). http://www.nolan.com/~pnolan/vertical.html.

Google Scholar

[7]

Siochi, A. C., and Ehrich, R. W. Computer Analysis of User Interfaces Based on Repetition in Transcripts of User Sessions. ACM TOIS. 9, 4 (October 1991), 309-335.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holtzblatt, K. "Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution." Chapter 36 in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Helander ed., Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, 791-817.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Burova AMäkelä JJyskä IKeskinen TKallioniemi PTurunen M(2024)Challenges of Remote XR Experimentation: Balancing the Trade-Offs for a Successful Remote StudyProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3689451(294-300)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3681716.3689451
Gittens C(2024)Remote HRI: a Methodology for Maintaining COVID-19 Physical Distancing and Human Interaction Requirements in HRI StudiesInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-021-10162-426:1(91-106)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10796-021-10162-4
Drozd OKirrane S(2023)A Conceptual Consent Request Framework for Mobile DevicesInformation10.3390/info1409051514:9(515)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090515
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Remote evaluation: the network as an extension of the usability laboratory
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
2. Information systems
  1. World Wide Web
    1. Web applications
      1. Internet communications tools

Recommendations

Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods

Usability evaluation methods (UEMs) are widely recognised as an essential part of systems development. Assessments of the performance of UEMs, however, have been criticised for low validity and limited reliability. The present study extends this ...
Remote usability evaluation: can users report their own critical incidents?
CHI '98: CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Usability of user interfaces: from monomodal to multimodal
BCS-HCI '07: Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but not as we know it - Volume 2

This workshop is aimed at reviewing and comparing existing Usability Evaluation Methods (UEMs) which are applicable to monomodal and multimodal applications, whether they are web-oriented or not. It addresses the problem on how to assess the usability ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CHI '96: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 1996

524 pages

ISBN:0897917774

DOI:10.1145/238386

Chairmen:
Bonnie Nardi
Apple Computer, Inc.
,
Gerrit C. van der Veer
Vrije Univ. Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Univ. of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands
,
Editor:
Michael J. Tauber
Univ. of Panderborn, Germany

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 1996

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CHI96

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI96: CHI '96 ACM Conference on Human Factors in

April 13 - 18, 1996

British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Acceptance Rates

CHI '96 Paper Acceptance Rate 55 of 256 submissions, 21%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

111
Total Citations
View Citations
3,214
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)178
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Burova AMäkelä JJyskä IKeskinen TKallioniemi PTurunen M(2024)Challenges of Remote XR Experimentation: Balancing the Trade-Offs for a Successful Remote StudyProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3689451(294-300)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3681716.3689451
Gittens C(2024)Remote HRI: a Methodology for Maintaining COVID-19 Physical Distancing and Human Interaction Requirements in HRI StudiesInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-021-10162-426:1(91-106)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10796-021-10162-4
Drozd OKirrane S(2023)A Conceptual Consent Request Framework for Mobile DevicesInformation10.3390/info1409051514:9(515)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090515
Capdevila MRodrigues KPascual AGranollers TMonné È(2023)Whitepaper: Remote usability laboratory to perform user and expert evaluationsProceedings of the XXIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction10.1145/3612783.3612804(1-9)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3612783.3612804
Kretzer FMaedche A(2023)Making Usability Test Data Actionable! A Quantitative Test-Driven Prototyping ApproachExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585659(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585659
Desolda GLanzilotti RCaivano DCostabile MBuono P(2023)Asynchronous Remote Usability Tests Using Web-Based Tools Versus Laboratory Usability Tests: An Experimental StudyIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2023.328222553:4(731-742)Online publication date: Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2023.3282225
Lord CBates OFriday A(2022)Critical Incident Technique and Gig-Economy Work (Deliveroo): Working with and Challenging Assumptions around AlgorithmsExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519865(1-6)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491101.3519865
Siltanen SHeinonen HBurova APalma PTruong POpas VTurunen M(2021)There is Always a Way: Organizing VR User Tests with Remote and Hybrid Setups during a Pandemic—Learnings from Five Case StudiesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti51000625:10(62)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5100062
Mastrianni AKulp LSarcevic A(2021)Transitioning to Remote User-Centered Design Activities in the Emergency Medical Field During a PandemicExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3443444(1-8)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411763.3443444
Alhadreti O(2021)A Comparison of Synchronous and Asynchronous Remote Usability Testing MethodsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.1938391(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1938391
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods

Remote usability evaluation: can users report their own critical incidents?

Usability of user interfaces: from monomodal to multimodal

Comments

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Cited By

PDF

eReader

HTML Format

Login options

Full Access

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods

Remote usability evaluation: can users report their own critical incidents?

Usability of user interfaces: from monomodal to multimodal

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations