Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2414536.2414559acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A framework for service recipient inclusion in community IT projects

Published: 26 November 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Not-for-profit organizations put considerable effort into community-based Information Technology (IT) projects to bridge the gap between the 'haves and the 'have-nots' of the digital divide. However, the outcomes of these IT projects are often seen as problematic with service recipients failing to gain the intended benefits. It is proposed that this is often because the recipients fail to be engaged as a result of being ascribed with belonging to a community without the perceived power or ability to participate. It is also proposed that this is an area for further study with a bias towards using Participatory Design Techniques in conjunction with the model suggested in this paper. The researchers believe that this could provide an area of investigation for an Action Research project.

References

[1]
Aaltonen, K, & Kujala, J, A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 26, (2010) pp.381--397.
[2]
Anglicare Victoria, About Us, 2008.Last viewed 6 June2011. www.anglicarevic.org.au/index.php?=5704&pageID=5828
[3]
Burt, W & Taylor, J. Information and communication technologies: Reshaping voluntary organizations? Non- profit Management & Leadership. 11(2) (2000), 131--143
[4]
Crump, B. & McIlroy, A. The digital divide: Why the "don't-want-tos" won't compute: Lessons from a New Zealand ICT project. First Monday, 8 (12) (1 December 2003)
[5]
Day, G. Community and Everyday Life. Routledge: Abingdon, UK. (2006)
[6]
DCITA. Information and communications technology transforming the non-profit sector. A discussion paper. Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts, Commonwealth of Australia, www.dcita.gov.au(2005)
[7]
Infoxchange Australia, About Us, Website last viewed 6 June 2011 www.infoxchange.net.org.au(2010)
[8]
Kuhn, S. & Muller, M. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM. 36(4) (1993) 24--28.
[9]
Kvasny, L & Keil, M. The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities. Information Systems Journal. 16, (2006). 23--53.
[10]
Lamb, R & Kling, R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly. 27(2), (2003). 197--235.
[11]
Obata, A. Ohori, K. Kobayashi, N. Hochreuter, H. & Kensing, F. Challenges of participatory design for social innovation: A case study in aging society. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers (2012)
[12]
Our Community. The Community Manifesto -- Valuing Australia's community groups. Our Community Pty Ltd, Melbourne, (2003).
[13]
Warschauer, M. Reconceptualising the digital divide. First Monday, 7, July (2002)
[14]
Warschauer, M. Technology and Social Inclusion. MIT: Cambridge, Mass. (2004)
[15]
Zhang W, Gutierrez, O & Mathieson, K. Information Systems research in the non-profit context: Challenges and opportunities, Communications of the AIS. Art. 1. (2010)

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
OzCHI '12: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference
November 2012
692 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • New Zealand Chapter of ACM SIGCHI
  • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 November 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. IT projects
  2. ascribed membership
  3. not-for-profit
  4. service recipients
  5. stakeholders

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

OzCHI '12
Sponsor:
  • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 78
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media