Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2433396.2433440acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robust query rewriting using anchor data

Published: 04 February 2013 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Query rewriting algorithms can be used as a form of query expansion, by combining the user's original query with automatically generated rewrites. Rewriting algorithms bring linguistic datasets to bear without the need for iterative relevance feedback, but most studies of rewriting have used proprietary datasets such as large-scale search logs. By contrast this paper uses readily available data, particularly ClueWeb09 link text with over 1.2 billion anchor phrases, to generate rewrites. To avoid overfitting, our initial analysis is performed using Million Query Track queries, leading us to identify three algorithms which perform well. We then test the algorithms on Web and newswire data. Results show good properties in terms of robustness and early precision.

    References

    [1]
    E. Amitay, A. Darlow, D. Konopnicki, and U. Weiss. Queries as anchors: selection by association. In Proc. of the sixteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, HYPERTEXT'05, pages 193--201, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
    [2]
    J. R. Baron, D. D. Lewis, and D. W. Oard. TREC-2006 legal track overview. In Proc. of TREC 2006, 2006.
    [3]
    L. Barroso, J. Dean, and U. Holzle. Web search for a planet: The Google cluster architecture. Micro, IEEE, 23(2):22--28, March-April 2003.
    [4]
    M. Bendersky, D. Metzler, and W. B. Croft. Parameterized concept weighting in verbose queries. In Proc. of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'11, pages 605--614, 2011.
    [5]
    M. Bendersky, D. Metzler, and W. B. Croft. Effective query formulation with multiple information sources. In Proc. of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM'12, pages 443--452, 2012.
    [6]
    E. Brill and R. C. Moore. An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction. In Proc. of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL'00, pages 286--293, 2000.
    [7]
    J. Brutlag. Speed matters for Google web search. Technical report, Google, 2009.
    [8]
    B. Carterette, V. Pavlu, H. Fang, and E. Kanoulas. Million query track 2009 overview. In Proc. of TREC 2009, 2009.
    [9]
    K. Collins-Thompson. Reducing the risk of query expansion via robust constrained optimization. In Proc. of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'09, pages 837--846, 2009.
    [10]
    N. Craswell and M. Szummer. Random walks on the click graph. In Proc. of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'07, pages 239--246, 2007.
    [11]
    H. Cui, J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and W.-Y. Ma. Probabilistic query expansion using query logs. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW'02, pages 325--332, 2002.
    [12]
    V. Dang and B. W. Croft. Query reformulation using anchor text. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM'10, pages 41--50, 2010.
    [13]
    P. A. Dmitriev, N. Eiron, M. Fontoura, and E. Shekita. Using annotations in enterprise search. In Proc. of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW'06, pages 811--817, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
    [14]
    J. L. Elsas, J. Arguello, J. Callan, and J. G. Carbonell. Retrieval and feedback models for blog feed search. In Proc. of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'08, pages 347--354, 2008.
    [15]
    J. Guo, G. Xu, H. Li, and X. Cheng. A unified and discriminative model for query refinement. In Proc. of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'08, pages 379--386, 2008.
    [16]
    D. Harman and C. Buckley. The NRRC Reliable Information Access (RIA) workshop. In Proc. of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'04, pages 528--529, 2004.
    [17]
    D. Hawking and N. Craswell. The very large collection and web tracks. In E. Voorhees and D. Harman, editors, TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press, 2005.
    [18]
    J. Huang, J. Gao, J. Miao, X. Li, K. Wang, F. Behr, and C. L. Giles. Exploring web scale language models for search query processing. In Proc. of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW'10, pages 451--460, 2010.
    [19]
    A. Jain, U. Ozertem, and E. Velipasaoglu. Synthesizing high utility suggestions for rare web search queries. In Proc. of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'11, pages 805--814, 2011.
    [20]
    R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, and W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In Proc. of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW'06, pages 387--396, 2006.
    [21]
    R. Kraft and J. Zien. Mining anchor text for query refinement. In Proc. of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW'04, pages 666--674, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
    [22]
    V. Lavrenko and W. B. Croft. Relevance based language models. In Proc. of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'01, pages 120--127, 2001.
    [23]
    S. Levy. In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives. Simon & Schuster, 2011.
    [24]
    S. Robertson. On GMAP -- and other transformations. In Proc. of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'06, pages 78--83, 2006.
    [25]
    C. Shannon, N. Petigara, and S. Seshasai. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379--423, 1948.
    [26]
    A. F. Smeaton and C. J. Van Rijsbergen. The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system. The Computer Journal, 26(3):10--18, 1983.
    [27]
    E. M. Voorhees. The TREC robust retrieval track. SIGIR Forum, 39:11--20, June 2005.
    [28]
    Y. Xu, G. J. Jones, and B. Wang. Query dependent pseudo-relevance feedback based on Wikipedia. In Proc. of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR'09, pages 59--66, 2009.
    [29]
    X. Xue, W. B. Croft, and D. A. Smith. Modeling reformulation using passage analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM'10, pages 1497--1500, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
    [30]
    E. Yilmaz and S. Robertson. On the choice of effectiveness measures for learning to rank. Inf. Retr., 13:271--290, June 2010.
    [31]
    S. Yu, D. Cai, J.-R. Wen, and W.-Y. Ma. Improving pseudo-relevance feedback in web information retrieval using web page segmentation. In Proc. of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW'03, pages 11--18, 2003.
    [32]
    W. Zhang and C. Yu. UIC at TREC 2006 blog track: a notebook paper. In Proc. of TREC 2006, 2006.
    [33]
    Y. Zhang and A. Moffat. Some observations on user search behavior. In Proc. of the 11th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, pages 1--8, 2006.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. Robust query rewriting using anchor data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSDM '13: Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
      February 2013
      816 pages
      ISBN:9781450318693
      DOI:10.1145/2433396
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. anchor text
      2. query rewriting

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WSDM 2013

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

      Upcoming Conference

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)The Power of Anchor Text in the Neural Retrieval EraAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_38(567-583)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022
      • (2018)Social SearchSocial Information Access10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_7(213-276)Online publication date: 3-May-2018
      • (2016)Prediction and Predictability for Search Query AccelerationACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/294378410:3(1-28)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2016
      • (2015)Synonym Discovery for Structured Entities on Heterogeneous GraphsProceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2740908.2745396(443-453)Online publication date: 18-May-2015
      • (2015)Web Query Reformulation via Joint Modeling of Latent Topic Dependency and Term ContextACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/269966633:2(1-38)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2015
      • (2014)Predictive parallelizationProceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval10.1145/2600428.2609572(253-262)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2014
      • (2013)Predicting the impact of expansion terms using semantic and user interaction featuresProceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/2505515.2507872(1825-1828)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2013

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media