Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2452376.2452463acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesedbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

In the Mood4: recommendation by examples

Published: 18 March 2013 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Traditional recommender systems generate personalized recommendations based on a profile that they create for each user. We argue here that such profiles are often too coarse to capture the current user's state of mind and desire. For example, a serious user that usually prefers documentary features may, at the end of a long and tiring conference, be in the mood for a lighter entertaining movie, not captured by her usual profile. As communicating one's state of mind to a system in (key)words may be difficult, we present in this demo Mood4 - a novel plug-in for recommender systems, which allows users to describe their current desire/mood through examples. Mood4 utilizes the user's examples to refine the recommendations generated by a given recommender system, considering several, possibly competing, desired properties of the recommended items set (rating, diversity, coverage). The system uses a novel algorithm, based on a simple geometric representation of the items, which allows for efficient processing and the generation of suitable recommendations even in the absence of semantic information.

    References

    [1]
    Pandora internet radio. http://www.pandora.com/.
    [2]
    S. Amer-Yahia, S. B. Roy, A. Chawla, G. Das, and C. Yu. Group recommendation: Semantics and efficiency. PVLDB, 2009.
    [3]
    J. Bennet and S. Lanning. The netflix prize. KDD Cup, 2007.
    [4]
    R. Boim, H. Kaplan, T. Milo, and R. Rubinfeld. Improved recommendations via (more) collaboration. WebDB, 2010.
    [5]
    R. Boim, T. Milo, and S. Novgorodov. Diversification and refinement in collaborative filtering recommender. CIKM, 2011.
    [6]
    N. Golbandi, Y. Koren, and R. Lempel. Adaptive bootstrapping of recommender systems using decision trees. WSDM, 2011.
    [7]
    J. L. Rodgers and W. A. Nicewander. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 1988.
    [8]
    X. Su and T. Khoshgoftaar. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2009.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EDBT '13: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Extending Database Technology
    March 2013
    793 pages
    ISBN:9781450315975
    DOI:10.1145/2452376

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 March 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Demonstration

    Conference

    EDBT/ICDT '13

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 10 submissions, 70%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 94
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media