Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2457317.2457327acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesedbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing linkset quality for complementing third-party datasets

Published: 18 March 2013 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Linked data best practices are getting extremely popular: various companies and public institutions have started taking advantage of linked data principles for exposing their datasets, and for relating their datasets to those served by third parties. Such enthusiasm is due to the linked data promise of evolving into a Global Data Space. Linksets are sets of links relating datasets and they surely play a fundamental role in this promise. However, a stable and well-accepted notion of linkset quality has not been yet defined. This paper contributes to overcome this lack by proposing a linkset quality measure. Among the different quality dimensions that can be addressed, the proposed measure focuses on completeness. The paper formally defines novel scoring functions and proposes an interpretation of these functions when maintaining and complementing third party datasets.

    References

    [1]
    R. Albertoni and M. D. Martino. Semantic similarity and selection of resources published according to linked data best practice. In R. Meersman, T. S. Dillon, and P. Herrero, editors, OTM Workshops, volume 6428 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 378--383. Springer, 2010.
    [2]
    K. Alexander, R. Cyganiak, M. Hausenblas, and J. Zhao. Describing Linked Datasets with the VoID Vocabulary, 2011, http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/.
    [3]
    C. Bizer and R. Cyganiak. Quality-driven information filtering using the WIQA policy framework. J. Web Sem., 7(1):1--10, 2009.
    [4]
    J. Bleiholder and F. Naumann. Data fusion. ACM Comput. Surv., 41(1), 2008.
    [5]
    J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko. Ontology matching. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (DE), 2007.
    [6]
    A. Flemming and O. Hartig. Quality criteria for linked data. 2010, http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/trdf/index.php?title=Quality_Criteria_for_Linked_Data_sources
    [7]
    C. Guéret, P. T. Groth, C. Stadler, and J. Lehmann. Assessing linked data mappings using network measures. In E. Simperl, P. Cimiano, A. Polleres, Ó. Corcho, and V. Presutti, editors, ESWC, volume 7295 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 87--102. Springer, 2012.
    [8]
    T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011.
    [9]
    P. N. Mendes and C. Bizer. Survey report state of the art in mapping, quality assessment and data fusion. Technical report, LOD2- Creating Knowledge out of Interlinked data, Deliverable 4.3.1, 2011, http://static.lod2.eu/Deliverables/Deliverable_4.3.1_FP7_LOD2_20110131.pdf.
    [10]
    P. N. Mendes, C. Bizer, J. H. Young, Z. Miklos, J.-P. Calbimonte, and A. Moraru. Conceptual model and best practices for high-quality metadata publishing. Technical report, PlanetData, Deliverable 2.1, 2012, http://planet-data-wiki.sti2.at/web/File: D2.1.pdf.
    [11]
    P. N. Mendes, H. Mühleisen, and C. Bizer. Sieve: linked data quality assessment and fusion. In D. Srivastava and I. Ari, editors, EDBT/ICDT Workshops, pages 116--123. ACM, 2012.
    [12]
    L. Pipino, Y. W. Lee, and R. Y. Wang. Data quality assessment. Commun. ACM, 45(4):211--218, 2002.
    [13]
    A. Schultz, A. Matteini, R. Isele, C. Bizer, and C. Becker. LDIF - Linked Data Integration Framework. In O. Hartig, A. Harth, and J. Sequeda, editors, COLD, volume 782 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2011.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Linked Open Government Data: Still a Viable Option for Sharing and Integrating Public Data?Future Internet10.3390/fi1603009916:3(99)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
    • (2022)Documenting the Creation, Manipulation and Evaluation of Links for Reuse and ReproducibilityKnowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_6(81-96)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
    • (2021)Knowledge Graph Completeness: A Systematic Literature ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056622(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EDBT '13: Proceedings of the Joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 Workshops
    March 2013
    423 pages
    ISBN:9781450315999
    DOI:10.1145/2457317
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 March 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. linked data
    2. linksets
    3. quality
    4. quality assessment

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    EDBT/ICDT '13

    Acceptance Rates

    EDBT '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 7 of 10 submissions, 70%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 10 submissions, 70%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Linked Open Government Data: Still a Viable Option for Sharing and Integrating Public Data?Future Internet10.3390/fi1603009916:3(99)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
    • (2022)Documenting the Creation, Manipulation and Evaluation of Links for Reuse and ReproducibilityKnowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management10.1007/978-3-031-17105-5_6(81-96)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
    • (2021)Knowledge Graph Completeness: A Systematic Literature ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056622(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
    • (2018)Quality measures for skosData Technologies and Applications10.1108/DTA-05-2017-003752:3(405-423)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
    • (2017)Overall quality assessment of SKOS thesauriJournal of Information Science10.1177/016555151667107943:6(816-834)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
    • (2017)CEDALProceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence10.1145/3106426.3106497(106-113)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2017
    • (2017)Linked Thesauri Quality Assessment and Documentation for Big Data Discovery2017 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS)10.1109/HPCS.2017.16(37-44)Online publication date: Jul-2017
    • (2017)Methods for Intrinsic Evaluation of Links in the Web of DataThe Semantic Web10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_5(68-84)Online publication date: 16-May-2017
    • (2016)Linkset Quality Assessment for the Thesaurus Framework LusTREMetadata and Semantics Research10.1007/978-3-319-49157-8_3(27-39)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2016
    • (2016)Integrated Quality Assessment of Linked Thesauri for the EnvironmentElectronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective10.1007/978-3-319-44159-7_16(221-235)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media