Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2481318acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TouchViz: a case study comparing two interfaces for data analytics on tablets

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

As more applications move from the desktop to touch devices like tablets, designers must wrestle with the costs of porting a design with as little revision of the UI as possible from one device to the other, or of optimizing the interaction per device. We consider the tradeoffs between two versions of a UI for working with data on a touch tablet. One interface is based on using the conventional desktop metaphor (WIMP) with a control panel, push buttons, and checkboxes -- where the mouse click is effectively replaced by a finger tap. The other interface (which we call FLUID) eliminates the control panel and focuses touch actions on the data visualization itself. We describe our design process and evaluation of each interface. We discuss the significantly better task performance and preference for the FLUID interface, in particular how touch design may challenge certain assumptions about the performance benefits of WIMP interfaces that do not hold on touch devices, such as the superiority of gestural vs. control panel based interaction.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (chi1241-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Amar, R., Eagan, J., and Stasko, J., Low-Level Components of Analytic Activity in Information Visualization, in Proc. of IEEE InfoVis '05, Minneapolis, MN, October 2005, pp. 111--117.
[2]
Bau, O. and Mackay,W. 2008. OctoPocus: a dynamic guide for learning gesture-based command sets. In Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 37--46.
[3]
Baudel, T. 2006. From information visualization to direct manipulation: extending a generic visualization framework for the interactive editing of large datasets. In Proc. of UIST '06, New York, NY, USA, 67--76.
[4]
Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., Heer, J., D³ Data-Driven Documents, In IEEE Trans. Vis. and Comp. Graph (InfoVis '11), pp.2301--2309, Dec. 2011.
[5]
Browne, J., Lee, B., Carpendale, S., Riche, N, and Sherwood, T. Data analysis on interactive whiteboards through sketch-based interaction. In Proc Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS), November, 2011.
[6]
Forlines, C., Wigdor. D., Shen. C., and Balakrishnan, R. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 647--656.
[7]
Grammel, L., Tory, M., Storey, M., How Information Visualization Novices Construct Visualizations, in Proc IEEE Trans. Vis. and Comp. Graph. (InfoVis, '10), vol.16, no.6, pp.943--952, Nov.-Dec. 2010.
[8]
Guimbretiere, F., Martin, A. and Winograd, T., Benefits of Merging Command Selection and Direct Manipulation. Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 12(3), pp 460--476, 2005.
[9]
Heer, J., Robertson, G.G., Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics, in IEEE Trans. Vis and Comp. Graph. (Infovis '07)., vol.13, no.6, pp.1240--1247, Nov.Dec. 2007.
[10]
Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., and Norman, D.A. 1985. Direct manipulation interfaces. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 4 (December 1985), 311--338.
[11]
Heer, J. and Shneiderman. B. Interactive Dynamics for Visual Analysis. Queue 10, 2, Pages 30 (February 2012), 26 pages.
[12]
Kolb, J., Rudner, B. and Reichert, M, Towards GestureBased Process Modeling on Multi-touch Devices. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 1, Volume 112, Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, Part 3, Chapter 8, Pages 280293. 2012.
[13]
Morris, M.R., Wobbrock, J.O. and Wilson, A.D. (2010). Understanding users' preferences for surface gestures. Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI '10). Ottawa, Ontario (May 31-June 2, 2010). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Info. Proc. Soc., pp. 261--268.
[14]
Nielsen, J. 2012. "Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox: Browser and GUI Chrome." http://www.useit.com/alertbox/uichrome.html
[15]
North, C., Dwyer, T., Lee, B., Fisher, D., Isenberg, P., Robertson, G. and Inkpen, K., Understanding Multitouch Manipulation for Surface Computing, in 12th IFIP TC13 Conf. in Human-Comp. Interaction (INTERACT 2009), Springer Verlag, August 2009.
[16]
Shneiderman, B.1983. Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages. IEEE Computer 16:8 (August 1983).
[17]
Stolte, C., and Hanrahan, P., 2000. Polaris: A System for Query, Analysis and Visualization of MultiDimensional Relational Databases. In Proc. IEEE Infovis, 00. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
[18]
Wigdor, D., and Wixon, D. Brave NUI World. 2012. Morgan-Kauffamn.
[19]
Wickham, H.: {http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/} webcite ggplot2: An implementation of the Grammar of Graphics. 2008. {R package version 0.8}.
[20]
Wobbrock, J.O., Morris, M.R. and Wilson, A.D. (2009). User-defined gestures for surface computing. In Proc. of SIGCHI '09. Boston, Massachusetts (April 4--9, 2009). New York: ACM Press, pp. 1083--1092.
[21]
Yee. W. 2009. Potential Limitations of Multi-touch Gesture Vocabulary: Differentiation, Adoption, Fatigue. Human-Computer Interaction. Novel Interaction Methods and Techniques. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, Volume 5611/2009, 291--300, ACM Press (2001), 9--18.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Mobile Visualisation Interactivity: Insights on a Mixed-fidelity Prototyping ApproachExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650994(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Eliciting Multimodal and Collaborative Interactions for Data Exploration on Large Vertical DisplaysIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332315030:2(1624-1637)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2024)This is the Table I Want! Interactive Data Transformation on Desktop and in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.329960230:8(5635-5650)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. TouchViz: a case study comparing two interfaces for data analytics on tablets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2013
    3550 pages
    ISBN:9781450318990
    DOI:10.1145/2470654
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 April 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. data visualization.
    2. gesture interfaces
    3. touch displays
    4. user studies

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 392 of 1,963 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)54
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Enhancing Mobile Visualisation Interactivity: Insights on a Mixed-fidelity Prototyping ApproachExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650994(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Eliciting Multimodal and Collaborative Interactions for Data Exploration on Large Vertical DisplaysIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332315030:2(1624-1637)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2024)This is the Table I Want! Interactive Data Transformation on Desktop and in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.329960230:8(5635-5650)Online publication date: Aug-2024
    • (2024)Semi-Automatic Layout Adaptation for Responsive Multiple-View Visualization DesignIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.324035630:7(3798-3812)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2024)User-Defined Interactions for Visual Data Exploration With the Combination of Smartwatch and Large DisplayIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340487612(78657-78679)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)Measuring Cognitive Abilities in the Wild: Validating a Population‐Scale Game‐Based Cognitive AssessmentCognitive Science10.1111/cogs.1330847:6Online publication date: 24-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Evaluating the feeling of control in virtual object translation on 2D interfacesArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing10.1017/S089006042300003337Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Composites: A Tangible Interaction Paradigm for Visual Data Analysis in Design PracticeProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3531073.3531091(1-9)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Mobile and Multimodal? A Comparative Evaluation of Interactive Workplaces for Visual Data ExplorationComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1455141:3(417-428)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Learn Spatial! Introducing the MARBLE-App - A Mixed Reality Approach to Enhance Archaeological Higher Education2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00093(435-440)Online publication date: Oct-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media