Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Abstraction and invariance for algebraically indexed types

Published: 23 January 2013 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Reynolds' relational parametricity provides a powerful way to reason about programs in terms of invariance under changes of data representation. A dazzling array of applications of Reynolds' theory exists, exploiting invariance to yield "free theorems", non-inhabitation results, and encodings of algebraic datatypes. Outside computer science, invariance is a common theme running through many areas of mathematics and physics. For example, the area of a triangle is unaltered by rotation or flipping. If we scale a triangle, then we scale its area, maintaining an invariant relationship between the two. The transformations under which properties are invariant are often organised into groups, with the algebraic structure reflecting the composability and invertibility of transformations.
    In this paper, we investigate programming languages whose types are indexed by algebraic structures such as groups of geometric transformations. Other examples include types indexed by principals--for information flow security--and types indexed by distances--for analysis of analytic uniform continuity properties. Following Reynolds, we prove a general Abstraction Theorem that covers all these instances. Consequences of our Abstraction Theorem include free theorems expressing invariance properties of programs, type isomorphisms based on invariance properties, and non-definability results indicating when certain algebraically indexed types are uninhabited or only inhabited by trivial programs. We have fully formalised our framework and most examples in Coq.

    Supplementary Material

    MP4 File (r1d1_talk8.mp4)

    References

    [1]
    M. Abadi, A. Banerjee, N. Heintze, and J. G. Riecke. A Core Calculusof Dependency. Proceedings, POPL, pp.147--160, 1999.
    [2]
    R. Atkey. Syntax for Free: Representing Syntax with Binding UsingParametricity. Proceedings, TLCA,pp. 35--49, 2009.
    [3]
    N. Benton, C.-K. Hur, A. J. Kennedy, C. McBride.Strongly Typed Term Representations in Coq. Journal of Automated Reasoning 49(2), pp. 141--159, 2012.
    [4]
    N. Benton, A. Kennedy, M. Hofmann, L. Beringer.Reading, Writing and Relations.Proceedings, APLAS,pp. 114--130, 2006.
    [5]
    J.-P. Bernardy, P. Jansson, R. Paterson.Proofs for Free: Parametricity for Dependent Types. Journal of Functional Programming 22(2), pp. 107--152, 2012.
    [6]
    L. Cardelli, P. Gardner.Processes in Space. Programs, Proofs, Processes: Proceedings, CiE, pp. 78--87, %LNCS vol. 6158, 2010.
    [7]
    Computational Geometry Algorithms Library (CGAL): User and ReferenceManual. Available at http://www.cgal.org.
    [8]
    S. Chaudhuri, S. Gulwani, and R. Lublinerman. Continuity Analysis ofPrograms. Proceedings, POPL, pp. 57--70, 2010.
    [9]
    J. Gallier. Geometric Methods and Applications For ComputerScience and Engineering. Springer, 2011.
    [10]
    J. Harrison.Without Loss of Generality.Proceedings, TPHOLs,pp. 43--59, 2009.
    [11]
    M. Hofmann. Correctness of Effect-based ProgramTransformations. Formal Logical Methods for System Security andCorrectness, pp. 149--173, 2008.
    [12]
    M. P. Jones. Functional Programming with Overloading and Higher-OrderPolymorphism. Proceedings, AFP,pp. 97--136, 1995.
    [13]
    A. J. Kennedy. Relational Parametricity and Units of Measure.Proceedings, POPL, pp. 442--455, 1997.
    [14]
    A. J. Kennedy. Types for Units-of-Measure: Theory and Practice.Central European Functional Programming school (CEFP), pp. 268--305, LNCS vol. 6299, 2010.
    [15]
    S. Mann, N. Litke, T. DeRose. A Coordinate Free Geometry ADT.Technical Report CS-97--15, University of Waterloo, 1997.
    [16]
    A. M. Pitts. Parametric Polymorphism and Operational Equivalence. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 10(3), pp. 321--359,2000.
    [17]
    J. Reed and B. C. Pierce. Distance Makes the Types Grow Stronger.Proceedings, ICFP, pp. 157--169, 2010.
    [18]
    J. C. Reynolds. Types, Abstraction and Parametric Polymorphism. Information Processing 83, pp. 513--523, 1983.
    [19]
    A. Sabelfeld and D. Sands. A PER Model of Secure Information Flow inSequential Programs. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation 14(1), pp. 59--91, 2001.
    [20]
    N. Shikuma and A.Igarahsi. Proving Noninterference by a FullyComplete Translation to the Simply Typed lambda-calculus. Logical Methods in Computer Science 4(3), 2008.
    [21]
    S. Tse and S. Zdancewic. Translating Dependency into Parametricity.Proceedings, ICFP, pp.115--125, 2004.
    [22]
    P. Wadler. Theorems for Free!. Proceedings, FPCA,pp. 347--359, 1989.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Formula Simplification via Invariance Detection by Algebraically Indexed TypesAutomated Reasoning10.1007/978-3-031-10769-6_24(388-406)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
    • (2018)Can an A.I. win a medal in the mathematical olympiad? – Benchmarking mechanized mathematics on pre-university problems1AI Communications10.3233/AIC-18076231:3(251-266)Online publication date: 17-May-2018
    • (2015)A typechecker plugin for units of measure: domain-specific constraint solving in GHC HaskellACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/2887747.280430550:12(11-22)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2015
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGPLAN Notices
    ACM SIGPLAN Notices  Volume 48, Issue 1
    POPL '13
    January 2013
    561 pages
    ISSN:0362-1340
    EISSN:1558-1160
    DOI:10.1145/2480359
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM Conferences
      POPL '13: Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages
      January 2013
      586 pages
      ISBN:9781450318327
      DOI:10.1145/2429069
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 January 2013
    Published in SIGPLAN Volume 48, Issue 1

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. computational geometry
    2. dimensional analysis
    3. information flow
    4. invariance
    5. metric types
    6. parametricity
    7. uniform continuity
    8. units of measure

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Formula Simplification via Invariance Detection by Algebraically Indexed TypesAutomated Reasoning10.1007/978-3-031-10769-6_24(388-406)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
    • (2018)Can an A.I. win a medal in the mathematical olympiad? – Benchmarking mechanized mathematics on pre-university problems1AI Communications10.3233/AIC-18076231:3(251-266)Online publication date: 17-May-2018
    • (2015)A typechecker plugin for units of measure: domain-specific constraint solving in GHC HaskellACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/2887747.280430550:12(11-22)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2015
    • (2015)A typechecker plugin for units of measure: domain-specific constraint solving in GHC HaskellProceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Haskell10.1145/2804302.2804305(11-22)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2015
    • (2014)From parametricity to conservation laws, via Noether's theoremACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/2578855.253586749:1(491-502)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2014
    • (2014)A relationally parametric model of dependent type theoryACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/2578855.253585249:1(503-515)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2014
    • (2014)From parametricity to conservation laws, via Noether's theoremProceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages10.1145/2535838.2535867(491-502)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2014
    • (2014)A relationally parametric model of dependent type theoryProceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages10.1145/2535838.2535852(503-515)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2014
    • (2014)A Core Quantitative Coeffect CalculusProceedings of the 23rd European Symposium on Programming Languages and Systems - Volume 841010.1007/978-3-642-54833-8_19(351-370)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2014

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media