research-article

Political blend: an application designed to bring people together based on political differences

Authors:

Abraham Doris-Down,

Eric GilbertAuthors Info & Claims

C&T '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies

Pages 120 - 130

https://doi.org/10.1145/2482991.2483002

Published: 29 June 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Modern social media have increasingly helped people separate themselves by worldview. We watch television shows and follow blogs that agree with our views, and read Twitter streams of people we like. The result is often called the echo chamber. Scholars cite political echo chambers as partly to blame for the divisive and destructive U.S. political climate. In this paper, we introduce a mobile application called Political Blend designed to combat echo chambers: it brings people with different political beliefs together for a cup of coffee. Based on interviews, we discovered that people are open to this kind of application and feel it may help the broader political environment. The primary contribution of this work is evidence that people are open to meeting those different from them, even those who ideologically oppose them. In an environment dominated by applications matching based on similarities, we see that this is an important finding.

References

[1]

Adamic, L., and Glance, N. The Political blogosphere and the 2004 election: Divided they blog. In Proc. LinkKDD, ACM Press (2005), 36--43.

Digital Library

[2]

Baron, R. S.et al. Social corroboration and opinion extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 6 (1996), 537--560.

[3]

Baum, M., and Groeling, T. New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25 (2008), 345--365.

[4]

Bishop, B. The big sort. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2008.

[5]

Garrett, R. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication vol 14, 2 (2009), 265--285.

[6]

Gilbert, E., Bergstorm, T., and Karahalios, K. Blogs are echo chambers: Blogs are echo chambers. In Proc. HICSS 2009, Computer Society Press, 1--10.

Digital Library

[7]

Hoyt, A. Reagan Part II: An American. The American Experience. WGBH, 1998.

[8]

Key, V. O. The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting, 1936--1960. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1966.

[9]

Kim, D., and Johnson, T., Political blog readers: Predictors of motivation for accessing politicalblogs. Telematics and Informatics, 29 (2012), 99--109.

Digital Library

[10]

Lee, E. (2007) Deindividuation effects on group polarization in computer-mediated communication: The role of group identification, public-self-awareness, and perceived argument quality. Journal of Communication, 57 (2007), 385--403.

[11]

Mackie, D. Identification effects in group polarization. journal of personality, and social psychology 50, 4 (1986), 720--728.

[12]

McPherson, M. Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (2001), 415--444.

[13]

Munson, SA, and Resnick, P. Presenting diverse political opinions: How and how much. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 457--466.

Digital Library

[14]

Oldenburg, R. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Da Capo Press, 1999.

[15]

Page, S. The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press, 2007.

Digital Library

[16]

Park, S., Kang, S., Chung, S., and Song, J. NewsCude: Delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. In Proc. CHI 20'09, ACM Press (2009), 443--452.

Digital Library

[17]

Pariser, E. Eli Pariser: Beware online filter bubbles http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles.html

[18]

Price, V., and Cappella. J. Online deliberation and its influence: The electronic dialog project in campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1, 1 (2002), 303--329

[19]

Putnam, R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, 2000.

[20]

Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MIT Press, 1993.

Digital Library

[21]

Schachter, S. Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 46, 2 (1952), 190--207.

[22]

Sechrist, G. B., and Stangor, C. Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 4 (2001), 645--654.

[23]

Shultz, G. Turmoil and Triumph: My Years As Secretary of State. Scribner, 1993.

[24]

Sia, Et Al. Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. INFORMS13, 1 (2002), 70--90.

Digital Library

[25]

Suler, J. The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, 3 (2004), 321--326.

[26]

Sunstein, C. Republic.com. Princeton University Press, 2001.

Digital Library

[27]

Sunstein, C. The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10, 2 (2002), 175--195.

[28]

Sunstien, C. Why societies need dissent. Harvard University Press, 2003.

[29]

Sunstein, C. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Pres, 2007.

Digital Library

[30]

Sunstien, C. Going to extremes: How likeminds unite and divide. NY: Oxford university Press, 2009.

[31]

Treviranus, J., and Hickema, S. The value of the unpopular: Counteracting the popularity echo-chamber on the Web. In Proc. Science and Technology for HumanityTIC-STH 2009, Computer Society Press (2009), 603--608.

[32]

Turkle, S. Alone Together. Basic Books, 2011.

[33]

Williams, L. E., and J. A. Bargh. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322, 5901 (2008), 606--607

[34]

Wojcieszak, M., and Mutz, D. Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication59, 1 (2009), 40--56.

Cited By

Bhuiyan MBautista Isaza CMitra TLee S(2022)OtherTube: Facilitating Content Discovery and Reflection by Exchanging YouTube Recommendations with StrangersProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502028(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3502028
Kim BXiong ALee DHan K(2021)A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directionsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.026008016:12(e0260080)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260080
Grön KNelimarkka M(2020)Party Politics, Values and the Design of Social Media ServicesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34151754:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3415175
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Political blend: an application designed to bring people together based on political differences
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences
2. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

A System for Monitoring Public Political Groups in WhatsApp
WebMedia '18: Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web

In Brazil, 48% of the population use WhatsApp to share and discuss news. Currently, there are serious concerns that this platform can become a fertile ground for groups interested in disseminating misinformation, especially as part of articulated ...
Direct online political communication effects on civil participation in Spain: an experimental study
TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

This study aims at updating our previous knowledge in reference with direct online political communication on social media. We focused on analyzing social media users' attitudes toward civil participation in national politics in Spain. It is ...
Partisan alignments and political polarization online: a computational approach to understanding the french and US presidential elections
PLEAD '13: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Politics, elections and data

With the advent of Twitter and the ability to collect large datasets from this technology, researchers have the opportunity to analyze political participation in cross-national electoral contexts. This paper capitalizes on this capability to examine ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

C&T '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies

June 2013

165 pages

ISBN:9781450321044

DOI:10.1145/2482991

Program Chairs:
Wolfgang Prinz
Fraunhofer FIT, RWTH Aachen
,
Christine Satchell
QUT, Brisbane; University of Melbourne

Copyright © 2013 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

ITIS: ITIS e.V.
EUSSET: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

C&T '13

Sponsor:

ITIS
EUSSET

C&T '13: International Conference on Communities and Technologies 2013

June 29 - July 2, 2013

Munich, Germany

Acceptance Rates

C&T '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 58 submissions, 29%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
320
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)23
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bhuiyan MBautista Isaza CMitra TLee S(2022)OtherTube: Facilitating Content Discovery and Reflection by Exchanging YouTube Recommendations with StrangersProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502028(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3502028
Kim BXiong ALee DHan K(2021)A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directionsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.026008016:12(e0260080)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260080
Grön KNelimarkka M(2020)Party Politics, Values and the Design of Social Media ServicesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34151754:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3415175
Lu AXu X(2020)"Learning for the Rise of China": Exploring Uses and Gratifications of State-Owned Online PlatformProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33928354:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 29-May-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3392835
Haq EBraud TKwon YHui P(2020)A Survey on Computational PoliticsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30349838(197379-197406)Online publication date: 2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034983
Gorkovenko KTaylor N(2019)Audience and Expert Perspectives on Second Screen Engagement with Political DebatesProceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video10.1145/3317697.3323352(70-82)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3317697.3323352
Nikolov DLalmas MFlammini AMenczer F(2019)Quantifying Biases in Online Information ExposureJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2412170:3(218-229)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/asi.24121
Kou YNardi BMandryk RHancock MPerry MCox A(2018)Complex Mediation in the Formation of Political OpinionsProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174210(1-15)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3174210
Garimella KMorales GGionis AMathioudakis M(2018)Quantifying Controversy on Social MediaACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/31405651:1(1-27)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3140565
Gonawela APal JThawani UVan Der Vlugt EOut WChandra P(2018)Speaking their MindComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-018-9316-227:3-6(293-326)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10606-018-9316-2
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents