Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2488388.2488508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Content-aware click modeling

Published: 13 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Click models aim at extracting intrinsic relevance of documents to queries from biased user clicks. One basic modeling assumption made in existing work is to treat such intrinsic relevance as an atomic query-document-specific parameter, which is solely estimated from historical clicks without using any content information about a document or relationship among the clicked/skipped documents under the same query. Due to this overly simplified assumption, existing click models can neither fully explore the information about a document's relevance quality nor make predictions of relevance for any unseen documents.
In this work, we proposed a novel Bayesian Sequential State model for modeling the user click behaviors, where the document content and dependencies among the sequential click events within a query are characterized by a set of descriptive features via a probabilistic graphical model. By applying the posterior regularized Expectation Maximization algorithm for parameter learning, we tailor the model to meet specific ranking-oriented properties, e.g., pairwise click preferences, so as to exploit richer information buried in the user clicks. Experiment results on a large set of real click logs demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model compared with several state-of-the-art click models.

References

[1]
E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S. Dumais, and R. Ragno. Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 3--10. ACM, 2006.
[2]
R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern information retrieval, volume 463. ACM press New York, 1999.
[3]
D. Bertsekas. Nonlinear programming. Athena Scientific, 1999.
[4]
O. Chapelle and Y. Zhang. A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, pages 1--10. ACM, 2009.
[5]
W. Chen, D. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, A. Singla, and Q. Yang. A noise-aware click model for web search. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 313--322. ACM, 2012.
[6]
C. L. Clarke, M. Kolla, G. V. Cormack, O. Vechtomova, A. Ashkan, S. Büttcher, and I. MacKinnon. Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 659--666, 2008.
[7]
N. Craswell, O. Zoeter, M. Taylor, and B. Ramsey. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining, pages 87--94. ACM, 2008.
[8]
G. E. Dupret and B. Piwowarski. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 331--338. ACM, 2008.
[9]
J. Graça, K. Ganchev, and B. Taskar. Expectation maximization and posterior constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20:569--576, 2007.
[10]
L. A. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. In Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 478--479. ACM, 2004.
[11]
F. Guo, C. Liu, A. Kannan, T. Minka, M. Taylor, Y.-M. Wang, and C. Faloutsos. Click chain model in web search. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, pages 11--20. ACM, 2009.
[12]
K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 20(4):422--446, 2002.
[13]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 133--142. ACM, 2002.
[14]
T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 154--161. ACM, 2005.
[15]
D. Koller and N. Friedman. Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques. The MIT Press, 2009.
[16]
L. Li, W. Chu, J. Langford, and X. Wang. Unbiased offline evaluation of contextual-bandit-based news article recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 297--306. ACM, 2011.
[17]
D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal. On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Mathematical programming, 45(1):503--528, 1989.
[18]
R. Neal and G. Hinton. A view of the em algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. Learning in Graphical Models, 89:355--368, 1998.
[19]
M. Richardson, E. Dominowska, and R. Ragno. Predicting clicks: estimating the click-through rate for new ads. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 521--530. ACM, 2007.
[20]
S. Shen, B. Hu, W. Chen, and Q. Yang. Personalized click model through collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 323--332. ACM, 2012.
[21]
Wikipedia. Standard score. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_score.
[22]
Y. Zhang, D. Wang, G. Wang, W. Chen, Z. Zhang, B. Hu, and L. Zhang. Learning click models via probit bayesian inference. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 439--448. ACM, 2010.
[23]
Z. A. Zhu, W. Chen, T. Minka, C. Zhu, and Z. Chen. A novel click model and its applications to online advertising. In Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 321--330. ACM, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A topic relevance-aware click model for web searchJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems10.3233/JIFS-23689446:4(8961-8974)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Counterfactual Ranking Evaluation with Flexible Click ModelsProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657810(1200-1210)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Probabilistic graph model and neural network perspective of click models for web searchKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-024-02145-z66:10(5829-5873)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '13: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
May 2013
1628 pages
ISBN:9781450320351
DOI:10.1145/2488388

Sponsors

  • NICBR: Nucleo de Informatcao e Coordenacao do Ponto BR
  • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. click modeling
  2. probabilistic graphical model
  3. query log analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WWW '13
Sponsor:
  • NICBR
  • CGIBR
WWW '13: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2013
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

WWW '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 125 of 831 submissions, 15%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A topic relevance-aware click model for web searchJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems10.3233/JIFS-23689446:4(8961-8974)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Counterfactual Ranking Evaluation with Flexible Click ModelsProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657810(1200-1210)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Probabilistic graph model and neural network perspective of click models for web searchKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-024-02145-z66:10(5829-5873)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Model-based Unbiased Learning to RankProceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3539597.3570395(895-903)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
  • (2023)An F-shape Click Model for Information Retrieval on Multi-block Mobile PagesProceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3539597.3570365(1057-1065)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2023
  • (2022)External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-BiasProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498420(252-261)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
  • (2022)ParClick: A Scalable Algorithm for EM-based Click ModelsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202210.1145/3485447.3511967(392-400)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Non-Clicks Mean Irrelevant? Propensity Ratio Scoring As a CorrectionProceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3437963.3441798(481-489)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021
  • (2021)A Graph-Enhanced Click Model for Web SearchProceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3404835.3462895(1259-1268)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2021
  • (2019)A Rank-biased Neural Network Model for Click ModelingProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3295750.3298920(183-191)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media