Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Results on finite wireless sensor networks: Connectivity and coverage

Published: 23 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Many analytic results for the connectivity, coverage, and capacity of wireless networks have been reported for the case where the number of nodes, n, tends to infinity (large-scale networks). The majority of these results have not been extended for small or moderate values of n; whereas in many practical networks, n is not very large. In this article, we consider finite (small-scale) wireless sensor networks. We first show that previous asymptotic results provide poor approximations for such networks. We provide a set of differences between small-scale and large-scale analysis and propose a methodology for analysis of finite sensor networks. Furthermore, we consider two models for such networks: unreliable sensor grids and sensor networks with random node deployment. We provide easily computable expressions for bounds on the coverage and connectivity of these networks. With validation from simulations, we show that the derived analytic expressions give very good estimates of such quantities for finite sensor networks. Our investigation confirms the fact that small-scale networks possess unique characteristics different from their large-scale counterparts, necessitating the development of a new framework for their analysis and design.

References

[1]
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communi. Mag. 102--114.
[2]
Bai, X., Kumar, S., Xuan, D., Yun, Z., and Lai, T. H. 2006. Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 131--142.
[3]
Balakrishan, H., Barrett, C. L., Kumar, V. S. A., Marathe, M. V., and Thite, S. 2004. The distance-2 matching problem and its relationship to MAC-layer capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 22, 1069--1079.
[4]
Balister, P., Bollobas, B., Sarkar, A., and Kumar, S. 2007. Reliable density estimates for coverage and connectivity in thin strips of finite length. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'07). 75--86.
[5]
Balister, P. and Kumar, S. 2009. Random vs. deterministic deployment of sensors in the presence of failures and placement errorss. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. 2896--2900.
[6]
Balister, P., Zheng, Z., Kumar, S., and Sinha, P. 2009. trap coverage: Allowing coverage holes of bounded diameter in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom). 136--144.
[7]
Bollobás, B. 2001. Random Graphs 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
[8]
Booth, L., Bruck, J., Franceschetti, M., and Meester, R. 2003. Covering algorithms, continuum percolation and the geometry of wireless networks. Ann. Appl. Probab. 13, 2.
[9]
Booth, L., Bruck, J., Cook, M., Franceschetti, M., and Meester, R. 2005. Continuum percolation with unreliable and spread out connections. J. Stat. Physics 118, 3--4, 721--734.
[10]
Desai, M. and Manjunath, D. 2002. On the connectivity in finite ad hoc networks. IEEE Communi. Lett. 6, 10, 437--439.
[11]
Dousse, O., Franceschetti, M., and Thiran, P. 2006. On the throughput scaling of wireless relay networks. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52, 6, 2756--2761.
[12]
Dousse, O. and Thiran, P. 2004. Connectivity vs capacity in dense ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).
[13]
Dousse, O., Thiran, P., and Hasler, M. 2002. Connectivity in ad-hoc and hybrid networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).
[14]
Dubhashi, D., Häggström, O., and Panconesi, A. 2003. Connectivity properties of bluetooth wireless networks. http://www.math.chalmers.se/∼olleh/papers.html.
[15]
Eslami, A., Nekoui, M., and Pishro-Nik, H. 2010. Results on finite wireless networks on a line. IEEE Trans. Communi. 58, 8, 2204--2211.
[16]
Fortuin, C. M., Kasteleyn, P. W., and Ginibre, J. 1971. Correlation inequalities on some partially ordered sets. Commun. Math. Physics 22, 2, 89--103.
[17]
Franceschetti, M. and Meester, R. 2008. Random Networks for Communication: From Statistical Physics to Information Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
[18]
Freanceschetti, M. and Meester, R. 2006. Critical node lifetimes in random networks via the Chen-Stein method. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52, 2, 2831--2837.
[19]
Ghasemi, A. and Nader-Esfahani, S. 2006. Exact probability of connectivity in one-dimensional ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 10, 251--253.
[20]
Gore, A. 2006. Comments on the connectivity in finite ad hoc networks. IEEE Communi. Lett. 10, 2, 88--90.
[21]
Grossglauser, M. and Tse, D. 2001. Mobility increases the capacity of ad-hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).
[22]
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P. 1998. Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks. Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications: A Volume in Honor of W.H. Fleming, W. M. McEneaney, G. Yin, and Q. Zhang, Eds. Birkhäuser, Berlin.
[23]
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P. R. 2000. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 46, 2, 388--404.
[24]
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P. R. 2003. Towards an information theory of large networks: an achievable rate region. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 49, 1877--1894.
[25]
Janson, S. 1986. Random coverings in several dimensions. Acta Mathematica 156.
[26]
Karmachandani, N., Manjunath, D., Yogeshwaran, D., and Iyer, S. K. 2006. Evolving random geometric graph models for mobile wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WIOPT'06).
[27]
Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Balogh, J. 2004. On k-coverage in mostly sleeping sensor network. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom).
[28]
Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Balogh, J. 2008. On k-coverage in mostly sleeping sensor network. Wireless Netw. 277--294.
[29]
Li, J., Blake, C., De Couto, D. S. J., Lee, H. I., and Morris, R. 2001. Capacity of ad hoc wireless netw. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 61--69.
[30]
Li, X. Y., Wan, P., Wang, Y., and Yi, C. W. 2003. Fault tolerant deployment and topology control in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'03).
[31]
Liu, B., Liu, Z., and Towsley, D. 2003. On the capacity of hybrid wireless networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).
[32]
Meester, R. and Roy, R. 1996. Continuum Percolation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.
[33]
Penrose, M. 2003. Random Geometric Graphs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
[34]
Penrose, M. D. 1997. The longest edge of the random minimal spanning tree. Ann. Appl. Probab. 7, 2, 340--361.
[35]
Perevalov, E. and Blum, R. 2003. Delay limited capacity of ad hoc networks: Asymptotically optimal transmission and relaying strategy. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).
[36]
Pishro-Nik, H., Chan, K. S., and Fekri, F. 2004. On connectivity properties of large-scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks. 467--472.
[37]
Shakkottai, S., Srikant, R., and Shroff, N. 2003. Unreliable sensor grids: Coverage, connectivity and diameter. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom'03).
[38]
Wan, P. and Yi, C. W. 2004. Asymptotic critical transmission radius and critical neighbor number for k-connectivity in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'04).
[39]
Xue, F. and Kumar, P. R. 2004. The number of neighbors needed for connectivity of wireless networks. Wireless Netw. 10, 2, 169--181.
[40]
Yen, L.-H. and Yu, C. W. 2004. Link probability, network coverage, and related properties of wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS'04).

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)On the Range Assignment in Wireless Sensor Networks for Minimizing the Coverage-Connectivity CostACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/345740817:4(1-48)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
  • (2019)Hybrid Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Improving the Coverage and Connectivity of Wireless Sensor NetworksWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-019-06492-xOnline publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2017)An energy efficient hole repair node scheduling algorithm for WSNWireless Networks10.1007/s11276-015-1132-823:1(103-116)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Results on finite wireless sensor networks: Connectivity and coverage

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 9, Issue 4
      July 2013
      523 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/2489253
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Journal Family

      Publication History

      Published: 23 July 2013
      Accepted: 01 June 2012
      Revised: 01 February 2012
      Received: 01 February 2011
      Published in TOSN Volume 9, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Wireless sensor networks
      2. connectivity
      3. coverage
      4. data communications
      5. finite networks
      6. random geometric graphs
      7. unreliable grids

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)On the Range Assignment in Wireless Sensor Networks for Minimizing the Coverage-Connectivity CostACM Transactions on Sensor Networks10.1145/345740817:4(1-48)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
      • (2019)Hybrid Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Improving the Coverage and Connectivity of Wireless Sensor NetworksWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-019-06492-xOnline publication date: 2-May-2019
      • (2017)An energy efficient hole repair node scheduling algorithm for WSNWireless Networks10.1007/s11276-015-1132-823:1(103-116)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
      • (2016)BibliographyDeploying Wireless Sensor Networks10.1016/B978-1-78548-099-7.50011-8(121-137)Online publication date: 2016
      • (2014)Border Effect Analysis for Reliability Assurance and Continuous Connectivity of Wireless Sensor Networks in the Presence of Sensor FailuresIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2014.231410213:8(4232-4246)Online publication date: Aug-2014
      • (2014)A Tractable Framework for Exact Probability of Node Isolation and Minimum Node Degree Distribution in Finite Multihop NetworksIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology10.1109/TVT.2013.229358063:6(2836-2847)Online publication date: Jul-2014

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media