Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Does Knowledge Management Matter? The Empirical Evidence from Market-Based Valuation

Published: 01 August 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Information technology is inseparable from contemporary knowledge management (KM). Although anecdotal evidence and individual case studies suggest that effective knowledge management initiatives contribute to superior firm performance, other kinds of empirical investigations are scarce, and more to the point, most of them are based on perceptions of survey participants embedded in the firms being studied. Moreover, studies analyzing the question of whether superior KM performance can predict superior market-based valuation appear to be virtually nonexistent. Findings of such studies would be of value to those who champion and direct a firm’s KM efforts, and to the firm’s strategists, planners, and operational managers. Here, we empirically examine the relationship between KM performance and firm valuation; the former is assessed by international panels of independent KM experts and the latter is evaluated in terms of market-based measures. Based on data spanning eight years, the results show that superior KM performance has a statistically significant positive association with firm valuation in terms of Tobin’s q, price-to-book ratio, and price-to-sales ratio. This study contributes to the management literature by using independent expert judges and archival data to substantiate the notion that KM competencies are an important ingredient in a firm’s performance as indicated by market-based valuation.

References

[1]
Althuizen, N., Reichel, A., and Wierenga, B. 2012. Help that is not recognized: Harmful neglect of decision support systems. Dec. Support. Syst. 54, 1, 719--728.
[2]
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strat. Manage. J. 14, 1, 33--46.
[3]
Argote, L. and Ingram, P. 2000. Knowledge transfer in organizations: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Processes 82, 1, 150--169.
[4]
Balakrishnan, R., Linsmeier, T. J., and Venkatachalam, M. 1996. Financial benefits from JIT adoption: Effects of customer concentration and cost structure. Account. Rev. 71, 2, 183--205.
[5]
Baloh, P., Desouza, K. C., and Hackney, R. 2012. Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems: A design science perspective. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 63, 5, 948--966.
[6]
Barber, B. M. and Lyon, J. D. 1996. Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Finance Econom. 41, 3, 359--399.
[7]
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage. 17, 1, 99--120.
[8]
Bennet, A. and Bennet, D. 2003. The rise of the knowledge organization. In Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge Matters, C. W. Holsapple Ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
[9]
Bharadwaj, A. S. 2000. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24, 1, 169--196.
[10]
Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., and Konsynski, B. R. 1999. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Manage. Sci. 45, 6, 1008--1024.
[11]
Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., Marsden, J. R., and Sankaranarayanan R. 2011. Digital goods and markets: Emerging issues and challenges. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 2, 89--105.
[12]
Bogner, W. C. and Bansal, P. 2007. Knowledge management as the basis of sustained high performance. J. Manage. Stud. 44, 1, 165--188.
[13]
Brown, B. and Perry, S. 1994. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s most admired companies. Acad. Manage. J. 37, 5, 1347--1359.
[14]
Castillo, J. 2003. Challenging the knowledge management mystique: An exploratory study on the performance of knowledge managing companies. J. Manage. Res. 3, 3, 152--172.
[15]
Choi, B., Poon, S. K., and Davis, J. G. 2008. Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach. Omega 36, 235--251.
[16]
Choi, J. and Russell, J. S. 2005. Long-term entropy and profitability change of United States public construction firms. J. Manage. Engrg. 21, 1, 17--26.
[17]
Chuang, S., Liao, C., and Lin, S. 2013. Determinants of knowledge management with information technology support impact on firm performance. Inf. Tech. Manage. 14, 1--14.
[18]
Chung, K. H. and Pruitt, S. W. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Finan. Manage. 23, 3, 70--74.
[19]
Conner, K. R. 1991. A historical comparison of the resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics. J. Manage. 17, 1, 121--154.
[20]
Conner, K. R. and Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7, 5, 477--501.
[21]
Darroch, J. 2005. Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. J. Knowl. Manage. 9, 3, 101--115.
[22]
Decarolis, D. M. and Deeds, D. L. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strat. Manage. J. 20, 953--968.
[23]
Degross, J. I. 1992. Directory of Management Information Systems Faculty in the United States and Canada. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[24]
Denis, D. J. and Denis, D. K. 1993. Managerial discretion, organization structure, and corporate performance: A study of leveraged capitalizations. J. Account. Econ. 16, 1--3, 209--236.
[25]
Denrell, J., Arvidsson, N., and Zander, U. 2004. Managing knowledge in the dark: An empirical study of the reliability of capability evaluations. Manage. Sci. 50, 11, 1491--1503.
[26]
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manage. Sci. 35, 11, 1504--1511.
[27]
Dodgson, M. 1993. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organ. Stud. 14, 3, 375--394.
[28]
Edwards, J. S., Handzic, M., Carlssson, S., and Nissen, M. 2003. Knowledge management research & practice: Visions and directions. Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract. 1, 1, 49--60.
[29]
Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., and Steenkamp, J. E. M. 2008. Effect of service transition strategies on firm value. J. Market. 72, 5, 1--14.
[30]
Felin, T. and Hesterly, W. S. 2007. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32, 195--218.
[31]
Feng, K. C., Chen, E. T., and Liou, W. C. 2004. Implementation of knowledge management systems and firm performance: An empirical investigation. J. Computer. Inform. Syst. 45, 2, 92--104.
[32]
Friedlander, F. 1983. Patterns of individual and organizational learning. In The Executive Mind: New Insights on Managerial Thought and Action. S. Srivastva and Associates Eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[33]
Galunic, D. C. and Rodan, S. 1998. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strat. Manage. J. 19, 12, 1193--1201.
[34]
Garby, E. 2002. Alternative measures of performance for e-companies: A comparison of approaches. J. Bus. Strategies 19, 1, 1--17.
[35]
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A. H. 2001. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 18, 1, 185--214.
[36]
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 33, 3, 114--135.
[37]
Greer, B. M. and Theuri, P. 2012. Linking supply chain management superiority to multifaceted firm financial performance. J. Supp. Chain Manage. 48, 3, 97--106.
[38]
Gupta, J. N. D. and Sharma, S. K. 2004. Creating Knowledge Based Organizations. Idea Group Inc. Publishing, Hershey, PA.
[39]
Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N., and Wang, H. 2011. Global equity offerings, corporate valuation, and subsequent international diversification. Strat. Manage. J. 32, 7, 787--796.
[40]
Holsapple, C. W. Ed. 2003. Handbook on Knowledge Management Vol. 1 & 2, Springer, Heidelberg.
[41]
Holsapple, C. W. 2005. The inseparability of modern knowledge management and computer-based technology. J. Knowl. Manage. 9, 1, 42--52.
[42]
Holsapple, C. W. and Jones, K. 2007. Knowledge chain activity classes: Impacts on competitiveness and the importance of technology support. Int. J. Knowl. Manage. 3, 3, 26--45.
[43]
Holsapple, C. W. and Joshi, K. D. 2004. A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 55, 7, 593--612.
[44]
Holsapple, C. W. and Singh, M. 2001. The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness. Expert Syst. Appl. 20, 1, 77--98.
[45]
Holsapple, C. W. and Singh, M. 2005. Performance implications of the knowledge chain. Int. J. Knowl. Manage. 1, 4, 1--22.
[46]
Holsapple, C. W. and Wu, J. 2011. An elusive antecedent of superior firm performance: The knowledge management factor. Dec. Supp. Syst. 52, 1, 271--283.
[47]
Hoskisson, R. E. and Hitt, M. A. 1988. Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms. Strat. Manage. J. 9, 6, 605--621.
[48]
Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2, 1, 88--115.
[49]
Jain, B. A. and Kini, O. 1995. Venture capitalist participation and the post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. Manage. Dec. Econom. 16, 6, 593--606.
[50]
Jayasingam, S., Ansari, M. A., Ramaya, T., and Jantan, M. 2012. Knowledge management practices and performance: Are they truly linked? Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract.
[51]
Kalwani, M. and Narayandas, N. 1995. Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationship relationships: Do they pay off for supplier firms. J. Market. 59, 1, 1--17.
[52]
Kaplan, S. 1989. The effect of management buyout on operating performance and value. J. Finan. Econom. 24, 2, 217--254.
[53]
Kumar, M. V. 2011. Are joint ventures positive sum games? The relative effects of cooperative and noncooperative behavior. Strat. Manage. J. 32, 1, 32--54.
[54]
Lang, L. H. P. and Litzenberger, R. H. 1989. Dividend announcements: Cash flow signaling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? J. Finan. Econom. 24, 1, 181--191.
[55]
Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strat. Manage. J. 28, 1187--1212.
[56]
Lavie, D. and Rosenkopf, L. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Manage. J. 49, 4, 797--818.
[57]
Lee, C. C. and Yang, J. 2000. Knowledge value chain. J. Manage. Develop. 19, 9, 783--793.
[58]
Lee, H. and Choi, B. 2003. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 20, 1, 179--228.
[59]
Levitt, B. and March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14, 3, 319--340.
[60]
Li, M. Z. F., Oum, T. H., and Zhang, Y. 2004. Tobin’s q and airline performances. Public Works Manage. Policy 9, 1, 51--65.
[61]
Liebowitz, J. 2008. ‘Think of others’ in knowledge management: Making culture work for you. Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract. 6, 1, 47--51.
[62]
Lindenberg, E. B. and Ross, S. A. 1981. Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. J. Bus. 54, 1, 1--32.
[63]
Lubatkin, M. and Shrieves, R. E. 1986. Towards reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 11, 3, 497--512.
[64]
Luo, X. and Donthu, N. 2006. Marketing’s credibility: A longitudinal investigation of marketing communication productivity and shareholder value. J. Market. 70, 4, 70--91.
[65]
Malhotra, Y. 2003. Why knowledge management systems fail? Enablers and constraints of knowledge management in human enterprises. In Handbook on Knowledge Management Vol. 1, C. Holsapple Ed., 577--600.
[66]
Marques, D. P. and Simon, F. J. G. 2006. The effect of knowledge management practices on firm performance. J. Knowl. Manage. 10, 3, 143--156.
[67]
Marx, F., Mayer, J. H., and Winter, R. 2011. Six principles for redesigning executive information systems---Findings of a survey and evaluation of a prototype. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 4.
[68]
McConnell, J. J. and Servaes, H. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J. Finan. Econ. 27, 2, 595--612.
[69]
McKinsey & Co., Koller, T., Goedhart, M., and Wessels, D. 2010. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies 5th Ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
[70]
Megginson, W. L. and Weiss, K. A. 1991. Venture capitalist certification in initial offerings. J. Finance 46, 3, 879--903.
[71]
Morley, B. 2009. Tobin’s Q and the location of foreign direct investment in China. Int. J. Bus. Manage. 3, 3, 24--28.
[72]
Nathan, S., Sivakumar, K., and Vijayakumar, J. 2001. Returns to trading strategies based on price-to-earnings and price-to-sales ratios. J. Investing 10, 2, 17--28.
[73]
Nold, H. A. 2012. Linking knowledge processes with firm performance: Organizational culture. J. Intell. Capital 13, 1, 16--38.
[74]
O’Dell, C. and Hubert, C. 2011. The New Edge in Knowledge: How Knowledge Management Is Changing the Way We Do Business. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
[75]
Ofek, E. and Sarvary, M. 2001. Leveraging the customer base: Creating competitive advantage through knowledge management. Manage. Sci. 47, 1441--1456.
[76]
Olson, G. T. and Pagano, M. S. 2005. A new application of sustainable growth: A multi-dimensional framework for evaluating the long run performance of bank mergers. J. Bus. Finance Account. 32, 9&10, 1995--2036.
[77]
Otchere, I. and Abou-Zied, K. 2008. Stock exchange demutualization, self-listing and performance: The case of the Australian Stock Exchange. J. Bank. Finance 32, 512--525.
[78]
Padmanabhan, B., Hevner, A., Cuenco, M., and Shi, C. 2011. From information to operations: Service quality and customer retention. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 4.
[79]
Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York.
[80]
Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., and Wegner, D. M. 2011. Action embellishment: An intention bias in the perception of success. J. Personal. Soc. Psy. 101, 2, 233--244.
[81]
Przasnyski, Z. H. and Tai, L. S. 2002. Stock performance of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award winning companies. Total Quality Manage. 13, 4, 475--488.
[82]
Radhakrishnan, A., Zu, X., and Grover, V. 2008. A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: An empirical investigation. Omega 36, 6, 1105--1125.
[83]
Rao, V. R., Agarwal, M. K., and Dahlhoff, O. 2004. How is manifest branding strategy related to the intangible value of a corporation? J. Market. 68, 4, 126--141.
[84]
Rosenzweig, P. 2007. Misunderstanding the nature of company performance: The halo effect and other business delusions. Calif. Manage. Rev. 49, 4, 6--20.
[85]
Rosner, R. L. 2003. Earnings manipulation in failing firms. Contemp. Account. Res. 20, 2, 361--408.
[86]
Sabherwal, R. and Sabherwal, S. 2007. How do knowledge management announcements affect firm value? A study of firms pursuing different business strategies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 54, 409--422.
[87]
Saeed, K. A., Grover, V., and Hwang, Y. 2005. The relationship of e-commerce competence to customer value and firm performance: an empirical investigation. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 22, 1, 223--256.
[88]
Senchack, A. J. and Martin, J. D. 1987. The relative performance of the PSR and PER investment strategies. Finan. Anal. J. 43, 2, 46--56.
[89]
Serenko, A. and Bontis, N. 2013. The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline. J. Knowl. Manage. 17, 1.
[90]
Simon, C. J. and Sullivan, M. W. 1993. The measurement and determinants of brand equity: A financial approach. Market. Sci. 12, 1, 28--52.
[91]
Smith, H. A. and Mckeen, J. D. 2005. Developments in practice XVII: A framework for KM evaluation. Comm. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16, 9, 233--246.
[92]
Spanos, Y. E. and Lioukas, S. 2001. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strat. Manage. J. 22, 907--934.
[93]
Sudarsanam, S. and Mahate, A. A. 2003. Glamour acquirers, method of payment and post-acquisition performance: The UK evidence. J. Bus. Finan. Account. 30, 1&2, 299--341.
[94]
Tobin, J. 1978. Monitary policies and the economy: The transmission mechanism. South. Econ. J. 44, 3, 421--431.
[95]
Tuschke, A. and Sanders, W. G. 2003. Antecedents and consequences of corporate governance reform: The case of Germany. Strat. Manage. J. 24, 7, 631--649.
[96]
Tuzhilin, A. 2011. Knowledge management revisited: Old dogs, new tricks. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2, 3, 1--11.
[97]
Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M. A., and Semadeni, M. 2006. Market value effects of acquisitions involving Internet firms: A resource-based analysis. Strat. Manage. J. 27, 899--913.
[98]
Weber, M. and Dudney, D. 2003. A reduced form coefficients analysis of executive ownership, corporate value, and executive compensation. The Financial Rev. 38, 3, 399--413.
[99]
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 5, 2, 171--180.
[100]
Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., and Snell, S. A. 2004. Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. J. Manage. Stud. 41, 2, 335--361.
[101]
Zack, M. H., Mckeen, J. D., and Singh, S. 2009. Knowledge management and organizational performance: An exploratory study. J. Knowl. Manage. 13, 6, 392--409.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gestão do conhecimento e memória organizacional: atualização de pesquisasPalabra Clave (La Plata)10.24215/18539912e22213:2(e222)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2022)The mediating role of customer knowledge management on the innovative work behavior and product innovation relationshipKybernetes10.1108/K-09-2021-081852:11(5353-5384)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
  • (2020)Using Data Sciences in Digital Marketing: Framework, methods, and performance metricsJournal of Innovation & Knowledge10.1016/j.jik.2020.08.001Online publication date: Aug-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Does Knowledge Management Matter? The Empirical Evidence from Market-Based Valuation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
    ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 4, Issue 2
    August 2013
    113 pages
    ISSN:2158-656X
    EISSN:2158-6578
    DOI:10.1145/2499962
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 August 2013
    Accepted: 01 March 2013
    Revised: 01 December 2012
    Received: 01 May 2012
    Published in TMIS Volume 4, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Knowledge management
    2. Tobin’s q
    3. knowledge chain theory
    4. knowledge management performance
    5. market performance
    6. market valuation
    7. organizational learning theory
    8. resource-based view

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Gestão do conhecimento e memória organizacional: atualização de pesquisasPalabra Clave (La Plata)10.24215/18539912e22213:2(e222)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
    • (2022)The mediating role of customer knowledge management on the innovative work behavior and product innovation relationshipKybernetes10.1108/K-09-2021-081852:11(5353-5384)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
    • (2020)Using Data Sciences in Digital Marketing: Framework, methods, and performance metricsJournal of Innovation & Knowledge10.1016/j.jik.2020.08.001Online publication date: Aug-2020
    • (2018)A knowledge management perspective of supplier development: Evidence from supply chain scholars and consultantsKnowledge and Process Management10.1002/kpm.156625:4(247-257)Online publication date: 8-May-2018
    • (2017)Current Issue on Knowledge Management System for future researchProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.011116:C(68-80)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
    • (2016)Instilling affective commitment: insights on what makes knowledge workers want to stayManagement Research Review10.1108/MRR-03-2014-006039:3(266-288)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2016
    • (2016)Parameters of knowledge management successSuccesses and Failures of Knowledge Management10.1016/B978-0-12-805187-0.00001-2(1-12)Online publication date: 2016
    • (2015)Supplier Development: A Knowledge Management PerspectiveKnowledge and Process Management10.1002/kpm.147822:4(250-269)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2015

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media